Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$1000 fine for bumper sticker...my car is 100% powered by vegetable oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:24 PM
Original message
$1000 fine for bumper sticker...my car is 100% powered by vegetable oil
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 10:24 PM by IChing
BRUCE HENDERSON
Bob Teixeira decided it was time to take a stand against U.S. dependence on foreign oil.So last fall the Charlotte musician and guitar instructor spent $1,200 to convert his 1981 diesel Mercedes to run on vegetable oil. He bought soybean oil in 5-gallon jugs at Costco, spending about 30 percent more than diesel would cost.

His reward, from a state that heavily promotes alternative fuels: a $1,000 fine last month for not paying motor fuel taxes.

He’s been told to expect another $1,000 fine from the federal government.

And to legally use veggie oil, state officials told him, he would have to first post a $2,500 bond.

Teixeira is one of a growing number of fuel-it-yourselfers — backyard brewers who recycle restaurant grease or make moonshine for their car tanks. They do it to save money, reduce pollution or thumb their noses at oil sheiks.

They’re also caught in a web of little-known state laws that can stifle energy independence.

State Sen. Stan Bingham, R-Davidson, is known around Raleigh for his diesel Volkswagen fueled by used soybean oil. The car sports a “Goodbye, OPEC” sign.

“If somebody was going to go to this much trouble to drive around in a car that uses soybean oil, they ought to be exempt” from state taxes, he said.

The N.C. Department of Revenue, which fined Teixeira, has asked legislators to waive the $2,500 bond for small fuel users. The department also told Teixeira, after the Observer asked about his case this week, that it will compromise on his fine.

But officials say they’ll keep pursuing taxes on all fuels used in highway vehicles. With its 29.9-cent a gallon gas tax, the state collects $1.2 billion each year to pay for road construction.

“With the high cost of fuel right now, the department does recognize that a lot of people are looking for relief,” said Reggie Little, assistant director of the motor fuel taxes division. “We’re not here to hurt the small guy, we’re just trying to make sure that the playing field is level.”


http://www.tondan.com/2007/06/13/1000-fine-triggered-by-bumper-sticker-powered-by-100-vegetable-oil/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is BS for this guy on so many levels
I don't even know where to start,

Hope he wins out in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. My reaction exactly
Complete BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. "level" my ass. Moral of story: Do not put a bumper sticker on your car
advertising your non-slave status viz. the oil companies! The overseers are watching!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexia Wheaton Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Correct. The government is out for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. There is even a story along these lines in the northeast
I can't find the story right now, but he was fined mega bucks also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. Illinois Man Fined Thousands And Threatened With Felony Prosecution For Using Untaxed Biodiesel
Ref: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/03/illinois_man_fi.php



Herald & Review/Kelly J. Huff
Decatur resident Dave Wetzel may be in hot cooking oil with the
Illinois Department of Revenue, who claim he needs to pay $244
in back taxes for the gallons of vegetable oil he has been
running his Volkswagon car on for the past 5 years.

State makes big fuss over local couple's vegetable oil car fuel
By HUEY FREEMAN - H&R Staff Writer

DECATUR - David and Eileen Wetzel don't get going in the morning quite
as early as they used to.

So David Wetzel, 79, was surprised to hear a knock on the door at their
eastside home while he was still getting dressed.

Two men in suits were standing on his porch.

"They showed me their badges and said they were from the Illinois Department
of Revenue," Wetzel said. "I said, 'Come in.' Maybe I shouldn't have."

Gary May introduced himself as a special agent. The other man, John Egan,
was introduced as his colleague. May gave the Wetzels his card, stating that
he is the senior agent in the bureau of criminal investigations.

...
More: http://www.herald-review.com/articles/2007/03/01/news/local_news/1021491.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm speechless, really I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexia Wheaton Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hate when the government interferes with creativity!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. that's their essential job. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. The government will always derail and subvert progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Government would be an instrument of progress
if only people were committed to making it work, instead of electing morons to office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can't even type the words that describe this kind of shit!!!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Where are the freaking recs?
This is outrageous!

Is it fascism YET? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wow!
I am sure this person had to pay sales tax on the oil he purchased at the Costco. (Winston Salem Newspaper). That shows he paid some taxes, just not the 'highway use tax' on gas that the Feds get. What is next? A tax for bus and taxi rides since they use the roads?
This is why we cannot get away from oil, the government has not figured out how to get rich off of the alternative fuels. Solar power gets virtually no promotion beccause they cannot tax the sun.
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
29. You also have to wonder...
if someone is buying gas for an offroad vehicle, or a lawn mower, or a portable power generator, or an air compressor, or a chainsaw, or any number of things that can use gas but don't go on the road... does that mean they should be EXEMPT from the gas taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. You can get a refund on the gas you use for off-road, but you have to file...
...with the Dept. of Revenue/Motor Fuels Divison and they will refund your 29.9 cents/gallon. I just called my SO who works for this department in NC and read this article to them. They told me that they have been trying to get the legistlature to waive the bond for small use drivers. The legistlature doesn't want to give up the tax revenue. I was told it was also a national law, so you get taxed twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
52. Hmm. In that case, it might just be easier to invent myself
a Jetsons-style hovercar...
hey at least it's easier than going through red tape... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sl8 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Untaxed (and dyed) diesel/fuel oil/kerosene is readily available.
I don't know if untaxed gasoline is available.

Just don't get caught with the dyed fuel in the wrong vehicle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. Belated welcome to DU, sl8!
:hi: Good to have you here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sl8 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. Grazie, grazie.
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 09:38 PM by sl8
Pleased to be here.

I didn't notice it at first - I like your avatar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
51. Yeah, a friend of mine who drives an old diesel car told me about that
After one of the hurricanes here in Florida, they were so desperate to get diesel in that they ended up using the dyed diesel for a week or so in the regular gas pumps. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sl8 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. I seem to recall
an exemption on the fuel tax in Florida after one of the hurricanes. I don't remember any details, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. I would say exempt the tax right now, but it pretty much is a road use tax
I think there should be a lower tax for homemade fuels but it should only be enforced after there are enough people doing it for it to actually make a difference in the revenues.

Best thing that can come of it would be if I'm making fuel for my car and paying a tax per gallon, I'd start finding people to sell some of the fuel to in order to lower if not eliminate what I am having to pay out of pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Uh oh . . .
Maybe I should buy a couple of gallons of gas each week I bicycle to work. You know, just so that Big Oil can get its cut, and I won't be some subversive anti-societal terrorist lover or something.

Nahhhhhhhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You shouldn't be able to ride your bike on the public streets
because you don't buy fuel to support highway funds.

If you put a bumper sticker on your bicycle, I wonder if they would fine you too?

It is ridiculous I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I'm not paying that tax on the food I eat to power my bicycle!
Nobody tell the State on me, OK?

This whole case is fricking ridiculous.
Any SANE government would be SUBSIDIZING this,
not punishing it. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spangle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh my GOSH!
Doesn't he get credit for recycling the oil??? What about cutting down on pollution, some places are getting hit hard by that.

I understand the need to generate money for roads. But does all that money really go to the road system in question? Some places the money is just put into the general fund. That makes the point mute. And if the general fund is also having to pay for pollution and dealing with the excess oil, etc.. He should get credit for doing his part. Not punished for it.

I could understand if this was such a major issue and there were tons of people doing this so much it was cutting into funds. But it isn't. By the time it does, there will be someone out there taking that oil, recycling it and selling it. Such persons would out bid to get the contract for the oil. Such 'single buyers' would be stuck getting theirs at the pump.

Right now... the point should be to encourage it as a test run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. That would be common sense. But remember, tobacco is legal and cannibis not.
There is little common sense going around any more.

I just have a sense of a new Boston Harbor tea party. Something along that line.

He who has the gold, rules. But I say- he who has the black gold rules all.

This totally sucks. And it's indicative of how badly in need this country is of a fresh start. We need a revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wasn't there a story like this out of Illinois a few months ago?
Ridiculous. But enough attention could get the rules changed, I think that's what happened with the other story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Shouldn't electric cars be subject to this fine also?
They use the road and pay no fuel taxes..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
37. do you suppose that this is one of the causes for the disappearance of the electric car?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. You can bet good money the states are working on contingency plans to collect road use tax...
People will have to re-think how we fund our road system IF and when we drastically reduce oil/gasoline consumption.

The fact of the mater is, the states have always had mechanisms in place to exact their pound of flesh from "scofflaws" that aren't paying their road tax. Up until now, the mechanism to beat the tax was to use diesel fuel sold for construction vehicles, farm vehicles and other off-road vehicles. As someone mentioned up-thread, don't get caught on the road with the wrong color diesel fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why can't they just add $100 to his licensing fee
for his license plates next time he has to register? It's more than a fair trade and most of us would pay it if it helps out in the long run.

He doesn't purchase gas. Why not add a small fee on with his state taxes at tax time? But he should also get a card of some sort showing that he's tax exempt during the year-on vegetable oil only. It's not like it's that hard to do-Dept of Revenue can get the forms from another dept (education, social services, etc) and have him fill it out with the exemption stated that it's only on veg oil (or soybean-whatever._ Then, at tax time, he can pay a bit extra in to the state for taxes or he can pay when it's time to renew his tags for his vehicle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. This totally sucks.
It sounds like something that a Texas legislator would do.

It's like, what do we want? To be slaves to the Arab countries?

-Boy are they in league with each other....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. This needs to be deregulated now....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. I gotta disagree with the premise of his argument
Gasoline taxes are this country's purest example of a government fee for services, at least in theory. Taxes on motor fuels are in almost all states used exclusively for the construction and maintenance of roads used by those who buy fuels.

Have you ever been behiind one of those trucks with a sign saying "this vehicle pays $10,000 in road taxes"? That truck probably does $20,000 of damage to the roads it uses in one year. Who makes up the difference? You and I. One heavy truck is equivvalent to thousands of cars in the damage it causes to road surfaces and base. But the fuel taxes paid by millions of drivers of cars and light trucks pay many times the fuel taxes that the truckers do. We are subsidizing the trucking industry. So Mr. Teixeira is not screwing the trucking companies, or the oil companies, he is screwing all of us who have to pay a slight bit more to repair the (admittedly slight) damage his vehicle causes.

Now you may want to applaud his giving the finger to big oil and I agree, they are deserving of it. But it isn't them who are paying for Mr. Teixeira's rebelliousness. You are and you should be aware of it before you encourage it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReverendDeuce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I agree 100%! I was thinking the same thing...
Does this clown think the roads build themselves? There will (and SHOULD BE) taxes that cover maintenance of basic infrastructure. Roads ARE a part of modern basic infrastructure as the public uses them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
36. ***cough***
***tax nazi*** ***cough***
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. the state senator had a bone-headed statement too:
"If somebody was going to go to this much trouble to drive around in a car that uses soybean oil, they ought to be exempt from state taxes," ...

my question to him would be "why?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. Because it is in the public interest to promote alternative fuels...
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 09:50 AM by originalpckelly
if we cut or eliminate taxes on fuels that are alternatives to foreign oil, it won't result in that much of a reduction in revenue because the number of people who will not pay the tax is relatively small. When the number of people using the exemption gets larger, thus signifying an increased use of alternative fuels, then the taxes can be re-applied in proportion to the number of people using the alternative fuels.

It's like a store putting something on sale to encourage its customers to buy, only in this case it's the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
56. but the roads still have to be paid for...
otherwise- what will the alternative-fuel vehicles travel on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. You have it completely backwards
The Federal Road Use and State Fuel taxes that I pay each year are used to maintain not only the public roads, but bike paths, light rail, and public transport in many states that I'm apportioned to drive in. If anything, trucks pay a higher percentage per mile driven in any jurisdiction in this country than automobiles. Our share of the tax burden is out of proportion to miles driven in any state.

I have paid over $18K in road use and fuel taxes some years. My taxes paid in many states makes up for the shortfall charged local citizens. It is always easier for a state legislature to tag out-of-state truckers with the majority of a fuel tax increase, instead of the taxpayers of that state. Truckers have always been seen as an easy mark by states that want to generate revenue without making their own constituents pay for it.

In New York State, for example, it costs me close to .40 a mile to drive in that state.

Just for taxes.

State fuel taxes are RARELY used only for repair; it is a scandal in some states that use the tax money for their pet projects, and not for road maintenance. Kansas recently had a dust-up when Gov. Sibelius wanted to use road and fuel taxes for community colleges. Those are not slush funds for pet projects; they are funds that should be used for road building and repair.

And 'one heavy truck' does not damage the road surface like a thousand cars would. Legally acceptable ground pressure per square inch formulas are engineering principals adhered to in road construction practices throughout the U.S. and Canada. There is a reason for the 80K weight limit and bridge laws, as that is the standard to which these roads are built. If the road does not stand up to these limits, then somebody either goofed on the math or scrimped on materials.

Shoddily built and maintained roads, however, always seem to be built by a contractor with close ties to the Statehouse, for some odd reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. This case brings to mind the old bumper sticker, which I'm guessing freeper-types like:
"Don't steal...the government hates competition!"

Although I totally believe that this isn't anything that could be remotely compared to stealing! This is just pathetic...they did this to an elderly couple in Illinois as well - it was discussed here a few months back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
28. This calls for an "I'm Spartacus" defense
Everyone who's environmentally concerned should put on a bumper sticker claiming they use biodiesel. Or maybe just something like "Biodiesel: The Way of the Future" that suggests they use it without explicitly stating it. Then when the government slaps them with fines, all people with stickers who didn't really use biodiesel can strike back with a massive class action lawsuit. That should get them to cool their jets for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. now that's an idea
start a thread on it, find the support. I'll get a sticker.

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sl8 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
47. "I'm Spartacus" defense - I like it
But, I'm not sure that it's appropriate in this case.

There may be occasions when your conscience demands that you disobey the law, but I don't think that avoiding the road tax is such an occasion (I'd guess that the gentleman in question had no such "nefarious" motives, but only overlooked the applicable laws).

I think that working to change the law so that it would encourage experimentation with alternative fuels would be a better alternative.

Still, the concept of an "I'm Spartacus" defense is wonderful. It reminds me of the stories of King Christian and his fellow Danes donning the yellow star. I just think that that defense is better reserved for more lofty goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
31. Why isn't the government going after the oil corps. for failing to pay their taxes?
Oh, maybe it's because Congress keeps finding a way to cutback their taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Anyone making $$$ hand-over-fist is exempt from taxation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. I wonder if theoretically he could use a double taxation argument?
taxes have been paid on the grease twice already, including the fuel used to transport it. seems to me that now it's being burned and it's a zero carbon addition it's more than done it's duty and paid it's way. But a double taxation argument is something the bureaucrats might be able to wrap their heads around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
40. I don't understand why he doesn't just pay the tax?
At 29 cents a gallon he still gets very cheap fuel and avoids the 1000 fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. he is not using off road diesel``
A habit many farmers pick up. He should be left alone. He could use a 90 10 mix of oil and #2 diesel and bypass this.

Lesson is to leave off the sticker and just bootleg it.

NC's tax is double sc's tax for fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
41. Oil companies make $100,000,000 / day and pay no taxes on it.
So why do we? And this guy got screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
46. He should pay
I use biodiesel, and when I fill up on it, I know I'm paying a fuel tax, eventhough it's all soybean going in. "shrug: And I should, I use the road ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. are you serious? he makes his own fuel!!
tax him for that why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. He uses the roads
That's what the tax is for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
48. How can you be taxed for a product you don't use?
I think I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
50. There's a guy here with a bumper sticker that says
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC