Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Polygamy: the Red State Answer to Family Values. AZ and UT Attorney Generals Won’t Prosecute It.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:53 PM
Original message
Polygamy: the Red State Answer to Family Values. AZ and UT Attorney Generals Won’t Prosecute It.
Edited on Fri Jun-15-07 12:54 PM by demobabe
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL

Polygamy: the Red State Answer to Family Values. Arizona and Utah Attorney Generals Won’t Prosecute Males with Multiple Wives. Orrin Hatch Counts Polygamists as Good Buddies and Fine Men.

When doing a high school term paper on Mormonism, we recalled that Utah was admitted as a state in the 1890s only after it prohibited the practice of polygamy.

Then, a couple of years back, we reported on BuzzFlash that in a town meeting in Utah, Orrin Hatch rebuffed complaints about polygamists who married underage girls and abused their wives. As much as Hatch has left little room to astonish us with his unctuous hypocrisy, we were indeed taken aback when Hatch was quoted as responding something like, "Show me the evidence. All the polygamists I know are good people." (No, we are not making this up.)

So maybe we should have been prepared for a Reuters story on June 12th that indicated that polygamists will not be prosecuted in the states of Utah and Arizona.

"We are not going to go out there and persecute people for their beliefs," said Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard.

Adds Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff: "We determined six or seven years ago that there was no way we could prosecute 10,000 polygamists and put the kids into foster care. There's no way that we have the money or the resources to do that."

Okay, Utah became a state under the condition it prohibit men from marrying multiple wives – and now the Republican Attorney General of Utah says that polygamy is de facto legalized. In a bi-partisan nod to an odd interpretation of the law and family values, the Democratic Attorney General of neighboring Arizona regards the practice as a religious belief, not subject to prosecution.

More here: http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/editorials/141
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. As long as underage girls are not being used, I have no problem with polygamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Apparently many of the girls feel that they are being used
You may wish to read this article:

http://www.janabommersbach.com/pm-fea-may04.htm


It seems that these polygamists are impregnating their "spiritual wives" who are legally single mothers and eligible for welfare. Many of them are married off at 14 so that they can start having children quickly--18 children per mother is not uncommon. If polygamy is winked at because of religious reasons, then perhaps AZ and UT need to reconsider their welfare laws.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And by used i mean being married off at all, not in used as somebody using somebody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. They are being used.
They are being married off to old men against their will. They are nothing more than breeding stock to a bunch of sick, twisted men. The children are brainwashed and kept away from the rest of the world as much as possible. As the boys grow up a lot of them are driven off by the older men. Those boys are actually the lucky ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. That's exactly it
In addition to the women being used, the boys are seen as threats by the older guys with the young wives, so they get run off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Well, whoop-de-doo. I'm gay and can't get married at all.
I happen to think polygamists should be prosecuted to the fullest possible extent of the law and have their kids placed into foster care- out of state, if necessary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sigh. I wish this editorial wasn't so broadbrush.
Not all red states condone polygamy. In fact, more red states don't than do. That's like saying all blue states tax you to death when, in fact, it's just a handful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I didn't read it as a broad brush against red states
Just AZ and UT because they have a record of doing nothing about the polygamists. In the article cited below, it appears that AZ CPS has sent girls back to their families even when the girls have told of abuse.

http://www.janabommersbach.com/pm-fea-may04.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. There is widespread opposition, hell, FEAR, of the cutlists in Arizona
especially rural northern Arizona.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ken Doll Mitt Romney's one and only joke
when someone asked him his opinion on gay marriage, he replied, "I believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman... and a woman... and a woman..." Hardy har har.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. So they prosecute a high profile case like Warren Jeffs to placate
those who know that abuse goes on all the time.  It seems like
groups such as the FLDS throw away their boys as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Prosecute them for child abuse, welfare fraud, kidnapping, child abandonment etc


...but not for polygamy (or bygamy). Let adults live as they wish and raise they kids as they wish (except for the narrowly defined crimes).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. They've been trying. There is enormous opposition to them doing so
and numerous logistical hurdles to overcome.

They've worked together for years trying to find ways to effectively prosecute. After all the tremendous work they've put through, only to face the opposition of even Arizona's Democratic governor (Goddard is a Democrat as well--and an acquaintennce of mine).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mark Shurtleff, most assuredly, has ambitions beyond his current station...
Edited on Fri Jun-15-07 03:49 PM by ToeBot
If he were to make polygamy the center piece of a crusade, it would rub many in the state the wrong way. It's a commonly held opinion (in Utah) that the denunciation of polygamy was only an acquiescence to man's law and not the will of god. Shrutleff is not about to offend those sympathies.

I'd heard the Mormons were gaining allot of power in Arizona politics, looks as though that's the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. In northern AZ, the cultists are deep into politics and law enforcement.
And very, very well-armed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I was referring to Arizona's legislature, but I have no doubt what you say is true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Actaully, one of our highest profile opponents of the cult is
a Mormon out of the Mesa area, a very, very Mormon area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. In both states' defense--there are untold blowbacks to aggressive prosecution.
First off, making all those childrens wards of the state would completely break the system.

All these children are already receiving AFDC.

There is TREMENDOUS support for these people in far northern AZ and the cultists are deeply embedded in the law enforcement in that region.

Go ahead, hang good people out to dry when they are facing a freaking brick wall.

Buzzflash just lost a reader. Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Uh, so what? We keep to the "status quo?"
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 12:13 AM by demobabe
So since all of those children are already receiving AFDC, we should turn a blind eye so abused children can grow up to abuse their children and create more harems with children on AFDC? Nobody in our country should have to grow up in a severely closed off society that promotes serious abuse.

Tell it to President Romney. I'm sure he'll agree with you.

We might as well get used to it now, since we can't do anything about voter fraud, we might as well just let the Republicans steal the elections yet again. It's status quo, after all. We've got lots of good people in Congress, but gee golly, they're just facing a brick wall.

Also tell me: if all of the children are already on AFDC, how is it going to "break the system" when they're already IN the system? They'd already be "breaking the system" being on AFDC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Many Mormons are duplicitous on polygamy
publicly decrying the practice while steadfastly refusing to help rid their states of polygamy. Jon Krakauer wrote of this in his enthralling "Under the Banner of Heaven". Polygamy is not endorsed...but not prosecuted. In Utah, where many of the police and government officials are Mormon, the polygamous Mormons are given a pass.
The result? Many under-age girls are sexually assaulted and the welfare rolls are burdened by the number of women and children receiving state funds while "Dad" collects the moola for all his "families". Dad doesn't have a job.
Read Krakauer's book: it will give you chills.
(He also wrote "Into Thin Air").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why isn't the US prosecuting them? Nice that Buzzflash ignores that--it involves
two states. These cultists are embedded in the area political realm--and DEEPLY into law enforcement in both states.

They are also enormously well-armed.

For a less-wacky view of the situation, for those who really want to understand it, try this: http://www.janabommersbach.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC