Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cohen: Are Media Out to Get John Edwards?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 11:54 AM
Original message
Cohen: Are Media Out to Get John Edwards?
Great pi8ece, as always, from Jeff
-----

Give me a break about John Edwards’ pricey haircut, mansion, lecture fees and the rest. The focus on these topics tells us two things about corporate media. One we’ve long known – that they elevate personal stuff above issues. The other is now becoming clear – that they have a special animosity toward Edwards.

Is it hypocritical for the former Senator to base a presidential campaign on alleviating poverty while building himself a sprawling mansion? Perhaps. But isn’t that preferable to all the millionaire candidates who neither talk about nor care about the poor? Elite media seem more comfortable with millionaire politicians who identify with their class – and half of all U.S. senators are millionaires.

Trust me when I say I don’t know many millionaires. Of course I don’t know many presidential candidates either (except my friend Dennis Kucinich, whose net worth in 2004 was reported to be below $32,000.)

But I’m growing quite suspicious about the media barrage against Edwards, who got his wealth as a trial lawyer suing hospitals and corporations. Among “top-tier” presidential candidates, Edwards is alone in convincingly criticizing corporate-drafted trade treaties and talking about workers’ rights and the poor and higher taxes on the rich. He’s the candidate who set up a university research center on poverty. Of the front-runners in presidential polls, he’s pushing the hardest to withdraw from Iraq, and pushing the hardest on Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to follow suit.
more:
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=12981

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just like they were out to get Clark in 2k4...the fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. And that's why I'm voting for him in the primary.
That wealth they're bitching about was EARNED beating up corporations that beat up on us. Seems like the good fight to me.

And if a stingy, patient-murdering HMO paid for that $400 haircut, I couldn't be more pleased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, they are out to ignore him.
Without constant media attention neither he nor any other candidate has a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. M$M wants a Hilary vs. Rudy dustup. Period.
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 12:07 PM by EVDebs
They won't mention the healthcare fiasco brought to us by the Insurance/Pharma industries for fear single-payer will win out. If Ahnold vetoes it this time around his political future sails into the sunset...and it looks like that's what's gonna happen.

Right now I'm for Edwards or Dennis K. In fact that would make a great combo ticket for progressives either way (Dennis/Edwards, too).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. They just need a scape-goat every election cycle
It's his turn :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yes2truth Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. They're not out to "get" Edwards. It's just that their ...

major advertisers (large corporations) detest trial lawyers that represent plaintiffs, and so what might appear to be an attack on John Edwards is better seen as tossing a bone to corporate medias best customers. Only Kucinich and Ron Paul are totally unacceptable to America's (sophisticated) elites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC