Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tony Snowjobs the Deleted RNC Email Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:44 PM
Original message
Tony Snowjobs the Deleted RNC Email Scandal
From today's WH Press conference with Tony Snow:

Q Waxman's committee has put out an interim report on the issue of the RNC emails showing, they say, that there was more use of those emails than the White House suggested, indicating possibly widespread violation of the Presidential Records Act. It's, like, 140,000 emails of Rove's, so the White House Counsel's Office is aware that official business was being conducted through this party (inaudible) system? Can you respond to all that and what --

MR. SNOW: Look, I can't respond specifically to things that the committee may have put out. But those email accounts were set up, A, on a model based on the prior administration, which had done it the same way, in order to try to avoid Hatch Act violations. And we'll just -- we'll leave it at that. I mean, these were designed precisely to avoid Hatch Act violations that prohibit the use of government assets for certain political activities.

Q What have you all found in looking at these emails and emails related to the U.S. attorneys --

MR. SNOW: I don't have any comment.

Q Tony, thank you; two questions. Channel 6 in --

MR. SNOW: I'll tell you what, let me back up -- a couple of things. Number one, again, I'm still trying to -- Hutch, I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to get at here. I want to make sure I give you a satisfactory answer. What you're talking about is?

Q Well, you all are going back and saying, remember, how many you could save that might be relevant to that inquiry.

MR. SNOW: Right.

Q I'm wondering where that stands. And are you prepared to give up whatever you found at --

MR. SNOW: Well, number one, I'm not going to get into any conversations we may be having with Senator Waxman's committee about what they may be requesting. But, again, the way the system works, any email sent to or received from White House emails are automatically archived. And the RNC has had an email preservation policy for White House staffers, as well. We've sort of been through this -- I'm not sure exactly what the start date was -- we'll just have to see how Counsel's Office responds to Representative Waxman's request.

Q We have been through this, but you were saying at the time there were, like, 50 staffers -- Waxman is saying, no, it's more like 88, and there are indications -- I mean, 140,000 emails is a lot of emails.

MR. SNOW: That is a whole lot of email.

Q And that's just Rove, that's not all the other folks.

MR. SNOW: That's a whole lot of email, absolutely right.

Oh boy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did I hear him correct??? Clinton did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes. The evil "previous administration."
Code words for the right wing hate and disinformation machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. "A previous Admin" probably means GWHB's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:47 PM
Original message
Even Snow couldn't spin out of that one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. WOOOOOHOOOOO!!!! We Have A Majority In The Senate Now Without Lieberman! Waxman's Been Promoted!
Senator Waxman? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oooh, blame Clinton! Ten points for Tony!
Yeah, the system the White House used was designed to "avoid" violations of the Hatch Act, you know, just like the Clinton administration. What a load of hooey. The parallel system was set up to avoid the Presidential Records Act, and everyone in the room knew it. Of course, the guardians of our public discourse in the press would never have the bad taste to mention it.

But of course, Tony can't comment (once he's put out his version of the "truth") on anything the Waxman Committee might be asking about. No real reason for that self-imposed restriction, but the good stenographers just copy it down as if it were true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. as long as billy did it too
forget that billy was scum to them at the time of his administration and that they proceeded to undo all the good things he had done. fuc tony snow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. moar
Q Tony, on the question of the emails, one of the things that the committee found was that a significant portion, I think close to half of the emails had gone between email addresses with a .gov address. How, then, if you say that this was set up to avoid Hatch Act violations, is that avoiding Hatch Act violations if these emails --

MR. SNOW: Again, I will let the lawyers work that out. I'm not going to try to pretend to be the legal --

Q Can the lawyers come talk to us about that?

MR. SNOW: Well, first, let's wait and see what Representative Waxman has to offer. I'm sure at the appropriate point we will have a response.

Q Following on that, the Chairman says that Alberto Gonzales, then White House Counsel, that there's evidence to suggest he was aware that Karl Rove and others were using RNC-related email for government business.

MR. SNOW: Again, that's an allegation and we'll respond to it in due course.

Q Is this being viewed as a serious concern in the White House now?

MR. SNOW: I have not had a conversation with Fred about it, so I don't know. I mean, obviously -- let me put it this way, we've seen a number of times right now where people have been putting together investigations to see what sticks. They have had very little success so far. This is an administration that is very careful about obeying the law. We take it seriously. The White House legal Counsel's Office takes it seriously. And we will look at whatever requests for information people on the Hill may have to offer. We have also made it clear that we are willing to cooperate on a number of fronts, but beyond that, I cannot and shall not go.

link: http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20070618006209&newsLang=en
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. According to Susan Ralston the White House Counsel's Office
has been aware SINCE 2001 that Rove was using RNC-related e-mail for government business:

Q Were other White House officials aware that Mr. Rove in 2001 was providing e-mails from his political accounts to investigators who were looking at Enron?

A I believe so, because all of the documents collected were turned over to the White House Counsel's Office.

Q Similarly, with respect to the six or seven subpoenas from Mr. Fitzgerald, or whatever the number was from Mr. Fitzgerald, were White House officials aware that you and Mr. Rove were providing e-mails sent and received on his political accounts to Mr. Fitzgerald?

A All the documents that we collected in those investigations or for those requests as well were turned over to the White House Counsel's Office to then submit.

http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20070618105351.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Two scandals, WHITEHOUSE.GOV emails and RNC domains
Apparently the Bush administration knew since 2005 of ~5 million missing emails from the WHITEHOUSE.GOV domain and, in violation of the Presidential Records Act, abandoned a plan to recover them back then. Communication using the RNC domains are a separate issue/scandal.

I wonder if Waxman is following up on BOTH these PRA violations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theNotoriousP.I.G. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. When you say "missing"
what does that mean exactly? I was under the impression that they still exist on servers somewhere and can still be recovered and the only way they could truly have "disappeared" is if the servers were destroyed or purposefully scrubbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not sure if they can be retrieved
CREW spells out the difference between the two separate scandals (RNC domain emails and WHITEHOUSE.GOV emails) in this fact sheet they posted about their "Without a Trace" report. They don't mention whether email from any of the servers can still be retrieved or not.
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27675

But whether or not the emails can be retrieved, according to CREW, the Bush administration has already committed 3 violations of the Presidential Records Act - see the "Without a Trace" executive summary:
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27604
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton.
Damn since everytime they get caught in a bind they blame Clinton. They say they are following Clinton's lead.

Well why in the hell aren't the following Clinton's lead in all the good things he did for this country...And besides, when complaints were made about Clinton, the Christmas card list was too long, he had too many over the week end visitors. etc etc why didn't the Clinton administration just say...well why can't we do it, bush did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, Tony, the Clinton administration did set up two different lines of communication
after the Republicans made such a hullabaloo out of VP Gore making some fund-raising calls from the White House. If the political assets were used only for political activities, that would be OK. But it's NOT OK to use RNC assets to make policy decisions and to circumvent open-records laws. Understand the difference? (I know you do, but you'll never admit it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. if BIll Clinton jumped off a bridge
would Tony advise Bush jump off too? Huh, Tony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC