Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Snow Responds To Potentially Illegal Use Of RNC Accounts: Clinton Did It Too

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:56 PM
Original message
Snow Responds To Potentially Illegal Use Of RNC Accounts: Clinton Did It Too
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 12:58 PM by Hissyspit
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/19/snow-clinton-records

Snow Responds To Potentially Illegal Use Of RNC Accounts: Clinton Did It Too

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee yesterday released a report documenting how White House officials have regularly used RNC and Bush-Cheney ‘04 e-mail accounts for official government business, in apparent violation of the Hatch Act. The report also found that the RNC has overseen “extensive destruction” of these e-mails, which would likely violate the Presidential Records Act.

During yesterday’s press briefing, White House spokesman Tony Snow brushed aside this direct evidence of potential illegality. His response: Clinton did it too. “Those email accounts were set up on a model based on the prior administration, which had done it the same way, in order to try to avoid Hatch Act violations.” Watch it:

VIDEO AT LINK

Snow’s statement is false. In 1993, President Clinton’s then-Assistant to the President John Podesta issued a staff memo clearly stating that all administration e-mails dealing with official business had to be “incorporated into an official recordkeeping system,” stressing that no “e-mail document that is a Presidential record should be deleted.”



Transcript:

Q Waxman’s committee has put out an interim report on the issue of the RNC emails showing, they say, that there was more use of those emails than the White House suggested, indicating possibly widespread violation of the Presidential Records Act. It’s, like, 140,000 emails of Rove’s, so the White House Counsel’s Office is aware that official business was being conducted through this party (inaudible) system? Can you respond to all that and what –

MR. SNOW: Look, I can’t respond specifically to things that the committee may have put out. But those email accounts were set up, A, on a model based on the prior administration, which had done it the same way, in order to try to avoid Hatch Act violations. And we’ll just — we’ll leave it at that. I mean, these were designed precisely to avoid Hatch Act violations that prohibit the use of government assets for certain political activities.

MORE


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Riiight. With a republican Congress that never uttered a word about it. Riiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. it would be cheaper and just as useful to hire this guy as press secretary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Minus the bode hair
they look amazingly similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:59 PM
Original message
yep
Tony made that excuse up out of whole cloth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, Clinton used RNC e-mail accounts? Weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That's what I thought as well!
What a scandal! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Please don't get the anti-DLC crowd started
If this turns into a rumor, I'm blaming you. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtanarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I guess that explains NAFTA
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ahh, you just have to love it when "The adults" are using the same argument..
a 5 year old would use.

"But, but, but Billy did it too!" :eyes:

These guys all need to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. When will someone tell them this is getting old and worn out
They have continually blamed Clinton for their failures for nearly 7 years.

Enough already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey, Tony? PATHOLOGICAL LYING is not a side effect of chemo.
This isn't gonna fly. And you don't get to plead "My disease and medications made me do it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Didn't the repubs have a thousand or so investigations of Clinton
going on during his terms? If they couldn't find it then, then I guess it didn't happen.

MORANS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Of course, email was still in its infancy then.
Perhaps they just didn't understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton also got a BJ in the OO. Bush gonna do that too?
Let's hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. If that trend gets started, then the first thing every president
will do from now on after taking the oath will be to have the Oval Office carpets changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hey Tony at some point our government must start telling
the truth. I don't care who else did it, if it's illegal let's address it now! And by the way I don't believe a word that you say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe true, Tony. But so what?
Clinton didn't get caught at it. You guys did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. not even true
check Podesta's "do not do this" email vs. the Rove Depts "do this for all sensitive matters" email on the subject.

The only person who caught Clinton doing this was Tony Snow when he made it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Whatever the truth of the matter, the fact remains that anyone
who puts sensitive info in an email is an idiot, and gets what they deserve. Email is not secure. Probably never will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thank goodness--we can go find their emails anyway!
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 01:43 PM by librechik


idiots.

and it serves them right for going through our personal emails without warrants.

But next time, they'll be more careful, and harder to defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Was Podesta's policy continued by his successors?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. They were supposed to, yes. But there was a specific email from somebody on Rove's staff
he/she told the receiver "use the other mail system" for a discussion on the fired USAs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. It wouldn't surprise me. As long as the behavior is not caught and punished,
then it will continue. This goes for both parties. D.C. is a swamp, both figuratively and literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. HEY TONY...saint Peter is watching you Very Closely...
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 01:29 PM by Hubert Flottz
He sees you when you're sleepin'...he knows when you're awake...he knows if you've been bad or good...so don't lie for goodness sake!

Edit...I think that thing has metastasized to Tony's department of good sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Nah. That ship sailed a loooong time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. Of COURSE he did, but he's not in office. What's your excuse? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. 'et tu' is a logical fallacy
Repugs were looking for something, anything that would bring down the Clinton administration. I'm sure they'd have found a second email system pretty quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. Alrighty then! We can Impeach him under the same reasoning!
If Clinton was Impeached, then Bush can be as well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC