Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Best Commencement Speech of the season

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 05:03 PM
Original message
Best Commencement Speech of the season
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. "my gratitude to you for training yourself to see"
Wow. It would be appropriate if the students -- specialists in communication -- were left speechless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I do disagree, however, with his characterization of Foucault
He calls Bush a fanatical follwer of Foucault (tongue in cheek, of course) because the Bushies feel they can "create reality." This belief is actually 180 degrees apart from Foucault's arguments about truth and power. If you suggested to Foucault that a small cabal of schemers can transform the complex web of words and things through deliberate action, he would have rolled his eyes at you, and provided a very succinct "Non." That's not what Foucault was saying at all. The opposite, even.

Indeed, Danner has an extremely naive understanding of the relationship between what he calls "rhetoric" and "reality." But it's a nice polemic anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. but it would be just like Bush to misinterpret those fundamental ideas ...
Kind of like if he seized upon, say, Swift's "A Modest Proposal", and did the exact thing that the author was criticizing.

Come to think of it, I don't recall seeing any Western philosophy courses on Bush's Yale transcript, so it someone said "Foucault" to him, he would probably think it was an insult! (As in, "you don't know Foucault".)

I do like Danner's idea of explaining why rhetoric is especially relevant these days, even though (as you say) he undoubtedly did simplify things quite a bit, for a public address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC