Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At NOON TODAY, Richard Cohen wants to hear from you about Scooter!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 10:41 AM
Original message
At NOON TODAY, Richard Cohen wants to hear from you about Scooter!
I kid you not--picked this up from Atrios:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/06/19/DI2007061901259.html



Cohen: Why Scooter Shouldn't Do Time

Richard Cohen
Washington Post Columnist
Wednesday, June 20, 2007; 12:00 PM

Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen will be online to discuss how an overblown case born of a political vendetta netted I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby 30 months in jail, and to explain his stance that Libby should be pardoned.

Submit your questions and comments before or during the discussion.



Well? beyond "Why do you still have a job?", can anyone think of some good ones for our "liberal" editorialist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. shameless self-kick
wouldn't normally do this, but there is a deadline approaching, hope anyone who wants to contribute to Cohen's discomfort level knows about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. asshat
Now I'm torn btw who's worse, him or David "Teeny Little Girly Hands" Brooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Brooks is EXPECTED to be a wanker
Cohen is expected to be "liberal."

Given the expectations vs. the execution, Cohen is worse, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. but Brooks gets all that face-time on the "liberal" outlets
He's the liberals' conservative: NPR, PBS, NYT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I hear you. and on a certain level, I don't mind Brooks
He's not entirely unreasonable (important qualifier here) as Republican apologists go.

On another level, he is the kind of conservative that allows liberals to think that the neocon brain trust isn't bat-shit crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. He's been called on his "should be done with the lights out" comment
He thinks it's funny.

Phoenix: Hi. You mentioned "politics, like sex and real estate, should be done with the lights off." I get the Clinton references but would argue that your later reference to a Stalin-style trial done by the left undermines that idea. Politics should be done with the lights on because I, for one, would like to know my candidate's bedfellows.

Richard Cohen: (Laughs.) I don't want to beat this sexual analogy to death. What I meant is that there are unsavory aspects to politics -- as there are to almost anything else -- and you just have to accept it. It was clear from the get go that the administrration wanted to destroy Joe Wilson. I thought Joe Wilson was right. I thought the administration's tactic was underhanded, a smear, and meant to undermine anyone else who might speak out. I condemned it at the time, but that's the way the game is played. I may not like, but there are basic principles involved. Back when I was a reporter I often relied on anonymous and confidential sources. And without them, some stories would never see the light of day.

Ok, Richard. We trust you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Appropos of that, I asked
Edited on Wed Jun-20-07 11:46 AM by BurtWorm
Was the fact that Valerie Plame Wilson worked for the CIA a story that *needed* to see the light of the day? Why would reporters find that newsworthy anyway, unless its newsworthiness was being spoonfed to them by all the VP's men?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I called him a devotee of the Blanche DuBois school of journalism.
"Keep the lights down low so I don't have to report anything unpleasant." I notice that my submission, like yours, was not posted. What a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. oh really?
is he choosing the questions he'll answer himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes, if you scroll down and read the fine print ...
it says that the guest may select which questions they wish to answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Blanche DuBois school of journalism! That's excellent!
:toast:

I asked several questions. I wish he would have asnwered the one about whether or not he'd read Greenwald. Or even just this one:

"Libby (and Cheney) were using the apparatus of the state (and a compliant media) to go after a private citizen who criticized the government through his wife. That's nothing?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Mr. Cohen, some of us are old fashioned
and don't support acts of treason against the US by the executive branch. Why do you? And why are Americans uninformed and dumb as bricks these days? Good day shithead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ha, only one question favoring Cohen view
the rest all saying Cohen is full of shit. I don't even trust that one question, it seems like a plant.

The questioning period didn't change anything. Cohen still feels Libby should be pardoned because there "is no underlying crime". No story here, move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's what my newspaper spouts too.
No underlying crime. And they ran Broder's column expressing the same lie. I really wonder, are America's reporters really that dumb or are they a willing party to the propaganda bubble?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I just think that media latches on to what is the easiest
Right wing Memes are pushed on corporate media. The RNC/Government pushes these memes and punishes any outlet which does not fall in line with their agenda.

Dems are not co-ordinated. Plus, Dems don't have the entire government to use as an extra arm of their party like the RNC does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC