Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cordesman: President's Strategy Not Working

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 04:04 PM
Original message
Cordesman: President's Strategy Not Working
http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/3273/Cordesman_Presidents_Strategy_Not_Working

Cordesman: President's Strategy Not Working
CSIS Draft Report Charges US Trying to Fight "Wrong War" in Iraq
Posted 1 hr. 8 min. ago

"The latest Department of Defense report on “Measuring Stability in Iraq” attempts to put a bad situation in a favorable light. It does not disguise many of the problems involved, but it does attempt to defend the strategy presented by President Bush in January 2007 in ways that sometimes present serious problems. More broadly, it reveals that the President’s strategy is not working in any critical dimension," senior CSIS Strategic Analyst Anthony Cordesman writes in the draft of his forthcoming report Still Losing? The June 2007 Edition of "Measuring Stability in Iraq"

Posted by Steve Clemons of the Washington Note, Cordesman's report posits that "Part of the problem is that the US is trying to fight the wrong 'war.' The US does need to fight a serious counterinsurgency campaign, but this seems to be focused far too narrowly on both Al Qa’ida, which is only one Sunni Islamist extremist movement, and on the most radical elements of the Sadr militia. The US does not have an effective strategy or the operational capability to deal with the broader problem of armed nation- building, or with a widening pattern of civil conflicts."

Cordesman says that the US is losing ground in Iraq, but argues that all is not lost. "The June 2007 report may 'spin' a level of success that does not exist, and understate many problems and challenges, but a detailed reading also highlights many efforts that can have considerable impact over time if Iraqi political conciliation takes place, if the US is more realistic about the time-scale and resources needed for effective action, and if the Congress and American people are given more reason to trust the reporting, strategy, plans, and program execution required from the US government."

Finally, Cordesman projects that the plan to stabilize Iraq requires a long-term commitment that will outlive current the Administration: "The US cannot bring security and stability within the life of the Bush Administration. It can only create a hollow and crumbling façade or withdraw. One key message that emerges from both the content and flaws in the June 2007 report is that success will be limited, uncertain, and take time. When it comes to effective US action in each of the major areas listed above, the time-scale is 2010-2015 and not 2008."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. You want to hear something REALLY scary?
This will actually come as a surprise to some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 2015?!?! TWENTYFIFTEEN?!?! They said SIX months!
And that was four $^%@#ing months ago!

(I'm channeling.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. yeah by 2015 we will have depopulated Iraq.
So sure, of course killing Iraqis and wrecking their nation will eventually succeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sure at some point they will be sufficiently brutalized
in Iraq that the hydrocarbon law will be signed and the troops that won't be stationed at our permanent bases there will be allowed to come home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Stupid Assumption From The "pundits"
These "military geniuses" only see things in x's and o's...forgetting about the variables that made this invasion a disaster from the outset.

The Iraqis didn't want us to "liberate" them. They don't want us to determine when things are "pacified" or to do anything else but get out. They live there, we don't. They've been invaded by many other great powers over the years and have persevered, they will do so again. Stability is only achieved when the people who inhabit the region establish or want it...not when it's imposed by an alien power that has shown little real interest in the culture of those they're killing.

If this country were to suffer a similar plight, would we sit still and agree to the demands or play the games of the occupier? I think not. Be it passive or active resistance, I suspect many here would put aside partisan divides to expell the invader and it wouldn't matter how long it takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC