Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CREW: Is Cheney Creating A Fourth Branch Of Government?-If So He Is Subject To These Senate Rules...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 12:05 PM
Original message
CREW: Is Cheney Creating A Fourth Branch Of Government?-If So He Is Subject To These Senate Rules...
Edited on Fri Jun-22-07 12:08 PM by kpete
CREW ASKS “IS THE VICE PRESIDENT CREATING A FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT?”
Contact:
Naomi Seligman Steiner

22 Jun 2007 // Washington, DC –

In light of new revelations that Vice President Cheney is claiming that his office is not subject to an executive order governing the handling of classified information because as president of the Senate he has both legislative and executive duties, CREW asks if Vice President Cheney is attempting to create a fourth branch of the government?

Under his argument, if Mr. Cheney is not subject to executive branch security requirements, surely he must be subject to Senate rules.

To safeguard sensitive information, in 1987 the Senate created the Office of Senate Security, which is part of the Secretary of the Senate. The Security Office’s standards, procedures and requirements are set out in the Senate Security Manual, which is binding on all employees of the Senate.

So, if Mr. Cheney is a member of the Senate, he must adhere to the following:

•a requirement that any of his staff needing access to classified information undergo a security clearance and complete written non-disclosure agreements;

•physical security requirements, that the Security Office is empowered to implement, including any necessary inspections;

•investigations of suspected security violations by employees, such as the security violation committed by Scooter Libby when he unlawfully disclosed the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson, then a covert CIA operative.

In addition, Mr. Cheney and his staff would be subject to investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, which has the responsibility to investigate allegations of improper conduct which may reflect upon the Senate, including violations of law and the rules and regulations of the Senate.

more at:
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29166
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Cheney's crazy lawyer Addington has painted the Veep into a corner
This story has been underground for over a year. They've been hoping it wouldn't bubble to the surface, and Cheney could just keep happily misbehaving with no consequences. Maybe there will be now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They've Long Blurred The Lines
Now wasn't it Executive Privilidge that kept the notes of the '01 Oil meeting secret and the Supreme Court upheld it? Well obviously that ruling was superceded by Crashcart's President of the Senate Authority or maybe he just issued a signing statement of his own that overrules everything.

We also saw in the Libby case of the selective definition of what the OVP was/is. He tried to use his Executive power to selectively leak...or allow Scooter...to leak Valerie Plame's name...making it "declassified" as the wave of his finger.

Yes...hopefully this over-reach will be used by Waxman to nail crashcart and isolate him. If crashcart now claims he's not the executive, then he shouldn't have the same privilidges, no????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree with Cheney, he's not part of the executive branch....
Therefore no executive privilege arguments allowed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't Cheney's view regarding his autonomy
place the VP's office in a position that is greater than the President/WH?

I wonder how Bush/Rove feel about their diminished position?

Do you think Rove will rat Cheney out in order to be King of the Hill?

This can not be going over very well in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cheney can do anything he wants as long as Bush doesn't object.
Heaven knows, Congress won't bother to stand in his way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC