Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Doctors' beliefs hinder patient care

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
qdemn7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:15 PM
Original message
Doctors' beliefs hinder patient care
From MSNBC Now this is going just too fucking far!!!!:grr: This sounds like some horrible joke, but it isn't:

Woman gets raped goes in for her exam at the ER, asks for emergency contraception and the Doctor tells her "No,"I can't do that. It's against my religion,"

And this isn't an isolated incident, this is just one woman.

Doctors refusing to perform abortions. (Yeah that's old news)
Doctors refusing EC.
Doctors refusing to prescribe ANY contraception.
Doctors refusing single women who want to adopt.
Doctors refusing single women infertility treatment.
Doctors refusing lesbians.
Doctors refusing women........

Wow, what do all these have in common? Uh.... let me think.... I know it'S WOMEN REFUSED TREATMENT!!!

In theory, the laws aren't aimed solely at women's health — a bill in New Jersey lists eye doctors and prosthetics technicians as examples of providers who'd be allowed to refuse care based on their beliefs. But Morrison warns women not to be fooled. "I ask you, what belief would keep someone from fitting a patient with a prosthetic limb?" she asks. "What they're really after is limiting access to women's health care. Reproductive health is seen as something other than regular health care" — not a straightforward matter of treating and healing, but something laden with morality — "and if you treat it that way, it becomes something providers can say yes or no to." Men, for the most part, escape such scrutiny: It's pretty hard to imagine someone being made to feel he's going straight to hell for choosing to take Viagra or get a vasectomy.

"Doctor, I want to get my dick hard. I won't go to hell will I?"

In a survey published this year in The New England Journal of Medicine, 63 percent of doctors said it is acceptable to tell patients they have moral objections to treatments, and 18 percent felt no obligation to refer patients elsewhere.

Please take time and read the entire article, it's lengthy I'm not going to post it here. Needless to say I'm so mad right now I know my blood pressure is gone way up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Would such refusals be a violation of the hypocratic oath?
Freedom isn't free right? If ya wanna enjoy your constitutional liberties stick your fucking religious beliefs where your tax exemption does not shine. I long for the headline. Woman refused treatment because doctor disapproves of christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Possibly a violation of the Hippocratic Oath
but perfectly in keeping with the hypocratic oath. ;-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. From the classical version of the Hippocratic Oath
Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. And the doctor's lobby, promulgating the myth of "frivolous malpractice suits"....
Edited on Fri Jun-22-07 02:21 PM by BlooInBloo
... When in fact there are 300,000+ preventable medical errors per year. They just care about covering their own asses.

EDIT: Subject typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well in fairness they are such huge asses, there's a lot to cover
I mean, they have huge asses . . . . i guess . . .

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. If sex is for marriage and children, single men should be refused viagra.
Give these physicians only limited licenses to practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sure. And maybe I'll open a restaurant and put a sign in the window: 'No Christians Served'.
See how far that goes.

Strip those doctors of their right to practice. That'll put an end to this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Outstanding Idea
Its against the chefs beliefs to cook for haters. Those sumbitches sure do like THEIR constitutional liberties don't they
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. I searched for months for the right OBGYN to deliver my 2nd baby.
After the 1st delivery was such a NIGHTMARE.

Imagine my dismay when she told me that she couldn't
"tie my tubes" after a scheduled C-section (if it came
to that, which it didn't) because she practiced in
a Catholic HOSPITAL. She wasn't on staff any where else.

If I wanted to have my tubes tied, I'd have to find some one else.
She wasn't against it, the hospital would have to make that
determination.

I never OCCURRED to me, in this day and age, that I couldn't
have the procedure if I wanted it, that some "board" had to
decide if it was in my best interest.

By the way, I was 37 at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Under Model Rules, attorneys are not allowed to refuse representation
if they find the client to be personally offensive according to their belief system.

(OTOH, would you want an attorney whom you weren't 100 percent sure was working hard for your case?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. things haven't improved in 40 years, they have just come full circle
we have become the laughing stock of the world.
Yesterday on the radio a guy calling from Madrid, Spain that bastion of catholic morality has recognized gay marriage. When I lived in spain they were terribly puritanical. If our husbands weren't at hand we would flash our wedding rings a lot, spanish women did not go shopping without their husbands!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mushroom Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Diabolical n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just another form of religious extremism
In this country, for some unaccountable reason religion is a "sacred cow" (no pun intended), so they get away with whatever they want!

Wish I had the money to satisfy Canada's immmigration requirements.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC