Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rolling Stone Blows CHENY/BUSH Secret Campaign (Enforced By Rove)To Deny Global Warming Wide Open...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:26 AM
Original message
Rolling Stone Blows CHENY/BUSH Secret Campaign (Enforced By Rove)To Deny Global Warming Wide Open...
Edited on Sat Jun-23-07 08:58 AM by kpete
The Secret Campaign of President Bush's Administration To Deny Global Warming
TIM DICKINSONPosted Jun 20, 2007 12:49 PM

The Secret Campaign of President Bush's Administration To Deny Global Warming Cheney's statements were the latest move in the Bush administration's ongoing strategy to block federal action on global warming. It is no secret that industry-connected appointees within the White House have worked actively to distort the findings of federal climate scientists, playing down the threat of climate change. But a new investigation by Rolling Stone reveals that those distortions were sanctioned at the highest levels of our government, in a policy formulated by the vice president, implemented by the White House Council on Environmental Quality and enforced by none other than Karl Rove. An examination of thousands of pages of internal documents that the White House has been forced to relinquish under the Freedom of Information Act - as well as interviews with more than a dozen current and former administration scientists and climate-policy officials - confirms that the White House has implemented an industry-formulated disinformation campaign designed to actively mislead the American public on global warming and to forestall limits on climate polluters.



Cheney took full advantage of the president's cluelessness, bringing the CEQ into his own portfolio. "The environment and energy issues were really turned over to him from the beginning," Whitman says. The CEQ became Cheney's shadow EPA, with industry calling the shots. To head up the council, Cheney installed James Connaughton, a former lobbyist for industrial polluters, who once worked to help General Electric and ARCO skirt responsibility for their Superfund waste sites.


Cooney was put in charge of damage control and was apparently instructed to craft a letter to the Times denying that the president had changed course on climate change. But this time, Cooney's editor was not just Connaughton, but Bush's chief political adviser, Karl Rove. The collaboration with Rove raises questions about Cooney's congressional testimony last March, in which he insisted, under oath, that he had not discussed with Rove his work at the CEQ.

The letter drafted by Cooney - and vetted by Rove - insists that the Climate Action Report "reinforces" the "significant scientific uncertainties" emphasized in the president's climate policy. Edits to the rough drafts of the letter were blacked out by White House censors, but Rove's pithy endorsement of the final draft survived. "Great," he wrote in praise of Cooney's spin. "Defends the report rather than staying focused on the policy."


8 pages, read the whole article at:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/15148655/the_secret_campaign_of_president_bushs_administration_to_deny_global_warming/1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why is our Congress permitting this abuse
I don't understand how he gets a "free pass" on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why? I don't know but maybe we better take a closer look at where they
get their campaign money from. Especially in light of the fact that they are now the 'majority'.

There's some reason that they're selling us all down the river. And they sure ain't taking the boat trip with us, are they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. No, and none of this is what America is supposed to be about
Do they just assume that torture, GITMO, domestic spying are just going to go away if they ignore them long enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I think so, I have an idea that they think they won't be tarred with the same
brush if they ignore it. They just pretend they don't have a responsibility to do something about it. We the people, the truly intended rulers of this country, want it halted. They look around and whistle happy tunes into the air, and pretend they're not part of the problem. They're wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. that is the saddest thing of all
If they don't want to do their job, fine, resign, but don't pretend to be a congressman and sit back and let torture, fraud, corruption, discrimination, cronyism, illegal occupations go on until the next election cycle. They are accountable as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. actually 60 is a majority, the veto pen will now be seen more as they reassert their brand
of tax cutting super heroes bravely doing battle against "tax & spend" Ds.

Reality is most of the electorate doesn't know or doesn't remember the majority R spending of the last 6 years.

tax & spend is a phrase any fifth grader will recognize
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
41. borrow and spend
these guys have borrowed four trillion dollars in order to give the rich folks three trillion in tax cuts..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. yes they have but Ds don't use catch phrases like robots & most of the
electorate does not have the time or will to keep up with current events. DUers are not reflective of the general knowledge of the population. We know because DUers sift through publications and post all news that reflects poorly on Rs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. saw an interesting thing on Bill Moyers
there are now 25 lobbyists for every congress critter, constantly spewing out the ideas of big business vs the common good of
the constituents back home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Yea, but just think how many that 25 will look like when a...........
mob of a hundred thousand show up and have much different ideas for how things should be going :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #38
46. or the state governments will roar past them
Edited on Sun Jun-24-07 11:51 AM by MissWaverly
The "Arnold" coming out against gerrymandering, says there was more chance for change in the Hapsburg
monarchy than our government. Change will happen in the environment, election reform, health care
and immigration and accountability. People are moving, they better get up front and "lead" them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. How much of our Congress does the OIL industry own?
THAT's the question . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. "Permitting" how?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. they are supposed to provide oversight
Edited on Sat Jun-23-07 09:26 PM by MissWaverly
since they refuse to bring impeachment proceedings, since they continue to fund things like "abstinence based" programs to
prevent pregnancy that have been proven to not work, they are enablers and Sen. Lieberman is the biggest Bush enabler
in congress, and they do not read him the riot act. If he had been in the same party as DeLay and acted like he
does in the House, bad mouthing the GOP, do you for 1 minute think that DeLay would not have made sure that he
saw the error of his ways. This country does not need two Republican parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
47. Impeachment isn't possible at the present. I hate to have that one
undoable "thing" loom over every thing that happens? As for Lieberman, unfortunately we need the jerk in order to maintain a majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. It isn't possible becuz the dems argue it will make Bush popular
Yep, believe it or not that's the official beltway reason that the Congress is not moving on this. If
Bush stays unpopular then the Dems will do well in 08. Tell that to the 500,000 people whose homes
are still wrecked from Katrina, you have to suffer two more winters w/o decent housing becuz we want
to be popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. No it's because we'd need about 20 Republicans to join us in order to impeach.
Edited on Sun Jun-24-07 12:52 PM by mzmolly
That's the unfortunate reality and until we can present evidence that would convince the overwhelming majority of "the people" that Bush should be impeached for something, it wont happen. It's not about being popular or not. Democrats suffer politically with that ass in office as well because we appear "weak" and "permissive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. don't worry once Gordon Brown takes over at Brit PM
the truth will comes out regarding Bushco, remember the uproar over the Dubai ports, I have felt all along
that it would be the Republicans who would initiate the unraveling of Team Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. That would be interesting.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. yes, indeed, I can't wait for Wednesday
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Dems -- indeed, the entire country -- react...
... (or fail to react) to this stuff as if it's either a) "politics as usual", or b) some sort of justifiable "counterweight" to the Clinton years or to the many decades of Democratic congressional control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I think we owe it to the world to impeach these people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainGlutton Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Well, like many things this Admin does, it's abuse but it isn't illegal.
Yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. well, I don't know about that
Edited on Sat Jun-23-07 09:37 PM by MissWaverly
there's been a lot of damage to the world due to global warming in the last 6 years, we have lost a lot of the ice at both poles
and in Greenland, that's going to have an impact, it has to. I just heard a lecture the other day which said that normal human DNA
has not changed that much in 1 million years, but that cancers cause such rapid mutations to DNA that they are hard to treat,
very little change for 1 million years and then rapid, uncontrollable change, oh, nothing to see here, please, move along
and fill up your tank on the way out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sent to greatest (#5) BUT......
This needs to go to Keith and be made public knowledge. (Fat chance).

These monsters are dooming their own offspring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
40. well
Rolling Stone does have a pretty large worldwide circulation...

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. It`s becoming very clear that bush is the president
in name only. Take cheney away and you have a first class clueless dumb ass. Even when bush had to testify, he wouldn`t go without cheney. cheney probably pumps him full of praise just to keep the idiot in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Bush has evidently done nothing at all, good or bad.
It has become obvious in recent weeks that every action that the "president" has taken has been Cheney's doing, and that those actions have been uniformly bad, if not evil. It will eventually be revealed that Cheney lies behind every single scandalous, un-American act of the entire administration. He's like some kind of super-criminal mind controller that everyone obeys mindlessly and that can't be stopped by any available means.

He'll laugh at us from Hell through all eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. WTF?
And it ordered a former intern from the Bush-Cheney campaign in the NASA press office to prevent Dr. James Hansen, the godfather of global-warming science, from talking to the media.
-------

There is a pattern with these young Rethug punks enjoying dissing experts in their fields. These young punks posing as christians are about to learn the lessons of their lives. The first thing they'll learn is that they were not hired because they are intelligent. They were hired becasue they take orders well.
-------------

Cheney is going down. I wonder if he won't croak during the heart surgery. That would be convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. There were hired because they take orders well and are DISPOSABLE.
Proud to be the pawns of the campaign, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. and if he DID croak during heart surgery
i'm afraid i must INSIST on a dna match with the cremated remains, from a reputable and trusted crematorium....

i'm just sayin'...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Oh man, WHAT heart surgery? And isn't that an oxymoron of sorts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. the battery of his pace maker needs replaced
and they have to remove it to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldtimeralso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. The Wizard of Oz team
One needs a heart, the other needs a brain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat 333 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
36.  lol
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #36
45. HEY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for the link, much appreciated! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mantis49 Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. egads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. knew it all along
read Molly Ivins' (RIP) book "Shrub"...and Gore Vidal's "Dreaming War"...Bush is mere puppet...Cheney and Rove are the puppetmasters

climate change evidence is "inconvenient" for the oil companies...therefore it must not allowed to be publicized...

...and the mess in the ME is all about controlling the oil resources, nothing more...if their major export were sugar beets, there wouldn't be US troops there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. Rolling Stone "Rocks." No pun intended.
So do you KP, thanks for the info! :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Cooney, "Well it depends on your definition of discuss is."
Seeing this played out in Cooney's perjury trial...

Cooney, "See I'm a good ol' boy at heart and I don't think of emails on the RNC account or having Rove writin' on my 'essays' as being 'discussion'. I think of discussion as a face to face conversation. Man had an opinion and I knew what it was, but we never had to 'discuss' it."

RE:
The collaboration with Rove raises questions about Cooney's congressional testimony last March, in which he insisted, under oath, that he had not discussed with Rove his work at the CEQ.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The Bush Admin equivalent of "what is is" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Perhaps they should've asked him...
... if any aspect of his (Cooney's) work at the CEQ had ever been or had ever been understood to be the grammatical subject or object of any sentence or sentence fragments, coded or uncoded, communicated in either a unidirectional or bidirectional manner between him (Cooney) and Rove at any time with or without any number of intermediary people or devices and by any method over any distance involving written word, spoken word, sign language, smoke signals, radio waves, electronic data transfer, ESP, sign language, semaphores, lights, morse code, crop circles......................... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
55. Do you think he would have blown up on the stand right there?
Like an android with a non-logical looping algorithm?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. These folks are about to make me pro-death penalty after all
This type of betrayal of the whole damn planet warrants ---- well, not much less it seems to me. My GOD, what have they wrought? And we're (rightfully) worried about the deaths of mere thousands in Iraq, and (rightfully) the deaths of thousands in NOLA? Terrible, all, but just wait til we get to the globally warmed up future, which is just around the corner now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Screwed by this cabal at every opportunity...
"despise" is lacking in intensity the revulsion I feel towards these criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
33. We knew this at the time, why so long to report?
why did it take so long for news magazines to begin investigating it?

Rolling Stone, where were you during the Energy Task Force meetings? Still blaming everything on Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
37. "Cheney took full advantage of the president's cluelessness..."==> Bullshit.
Cluelessness is Bush's teflon and it's worn thin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. I agree.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
39. And nothing will be done about this- again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
42. republicons = dishonor and lies
k and r

Why do republicons HATE America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. Not only America, they hate the planet earth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
43. Well at least Rolling Stone has
some journalists that still do investigative work. So we know that skill set has not been lost entirely. Good to know.

Waiting to see what Congress will do with this info.

Maybe write Dingle and Waxman this morning and ask them what they intend to do?

John Dingle, Chair
Committee on Energy and Commerce
2125 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515

(202) 225-2927
(or email via this site: http://energycommerce.house.gov/membios/contact_form.shtml)

******

Henry Waxman, Chair
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
U.S. House of Representatives
2157 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-5051
(or email the committee via this site: http://oversight.house.gov/contact.asp )







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC