Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards on the Employee Free Choice Act and the Supreme Court:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 01:39 PM
Original message
John Edwards on the Employee Free Choice Act and the Supreme Court:
Edited on Tue Jun-26-07 01:41 PM by Heaven and Earth
On the failure of the Employee Free Choice Act:

"Union membership can be the difference between a poverty-wage job and middle-class security. This was probably the single most important vote on the future of the middle class cast in the Senate this year. Millions of Americans want and deserve what unions provide: health care, a secure retirement and job stability. However, businesses regularly and illegally fight union organizing drives.

"Today, a majority of the Senate stood up to make it easier for workers to join a union. A minority of senators showed which side they are on by blocking the bill today -- but they won't be able to block it forever. When I'm president, we will have strong, fair labor laws. If a Republican can join the Republican Party by signing their name to a card, any worker in America ought to be able to join a union by doing exactly the same thing."

Instead of saying "majority of the senate" he should have said "Democrats," but it's a good statement anyway. As an aside, the Democratic Party needs unions to increase their strength so they can hound even more Republicans out of the congress, and the Republicans know it.

On recent Supreme Court decisions:

"Like President Bush, Chief Justice Roberts sought high office claiming he would be a consensus-builder. But this term's rash of far-reaching 5-4 decisions proves that Roberts, like Bush, is exactly the opposite. With its two newest members, today's Supreme Court is moving the right-wing's agenda faster than we've seen in decades—slamming the courthouse doors in the faces of ordinary people, favoring big businesses over civil rights, and undermining protections for women and the environment. Because the next president will likely nominate at least one Supreme Court justice, which could shape the balance of power on the Court for years to come, the stakes in the 2008 election could not be higher."

I'm not sure why he didn't mention enabling the president to embezzle taxpayer dollars for payoffs to his cronies at the pulpit, but maybe that decision hadn't come out yet when he released the statement.

Clearly, Edwards knows what's up. I trust John Edwards to nominate a Supreme Court justice that will speak for me, and he's been pushing union-building measures for a long time now. I'd bet any amount of money that he'd sign the Employee Free Choice Act, no problem, and that should be one of the top three priorities for the Democratic Party.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I trust him too -
Thanks!

K&R!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. And in reading this you understand why Repubs fear him most as the Dem Nominee....
Edwards would spark a change in this country that would threaten the corporate elites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC