Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The unbeatable ticket would be

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:11 PM
Original message
The unbeatable ticket would be
Gore / Clark

Face it, we are at war. Having Clark immunizes the ticket from "lack of military experience at a time of war" spin, which you KNOW is coming from the right wing media machine.

Clark actually becomes a plus to the ticket for all those independents out there who are concerned about the country's safety.

And Gore, well, he is the ultimate satisfier for Dems of all flavors. Progressives will not abandon the party if Gore runs.

There is no Republican ticket that could come close to a Gore / Clark ticket. It would be one of the biggest landslides ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fightthegoodfightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Forget It
The forces of war are always life sucking our country into the abyss. We don't need Clark to validate them. They already have too much power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Clark is not pro war
he does not validate this war at all. He is one of the biggest critics of the war. Check out his stand on the issues, I think you'll be impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightthegoodfightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yea....Clark Opposes the War
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 10:01 PM by fightthegoodfightnow
..........but why is it that folks always think we would be more 'winnable' if we were more like them.......

The same strategy was used to nominate Kerry and look what happened. Kerry was far superior to Bush on war experience and yet he was Swift Boated.

Nah...........I'm tired of trying to appease the right thumping our chests to remind them that we have noble soldiers and veterans on our side.

Sure we do, but why should it matter!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Because Clark's military gravitas would garner Heartland white
male voters.

Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightthegoodfightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And God Knows We Need their Sheltered Voices Heard Louder
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. I don't think Clark is "beling like them"
i think you should read more about his stand on issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. He is pro Pentagon
and the Pentagon is the one institution in this country that needs to experience the cold hand of civilian oversight on its budget.

We can't afford to use it as a welfare office for out of work arms contractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightthegoodfightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Well Said
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Just out of curiosity, where did you first get your information
on the neocon's plans to attack Iraq and then go after Iran and Syria?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Don't know about the poster you're responding to, but I first heard about it from
WESLEY CLARK on CNN.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Right On!
Exactly my point!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like the ticket, although your reasoning is really strange, seeing as Al Gore enlisted during
Vietnam. And then went to Vietnam.

Gore did not go AWOL from TANG.

So, military creds aren't a huge issue.

Clark is a great VP candidate for a number of reasons, of which his military service is one.

And, I've been facing the fact that we are "at war" since we illegally invaded Iraq.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. military credentials
yes Al enlisted, but he has never been anything close to a General. My point is that Clark has far more experience than any of the Repubs will have so they won't even be able to bring it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rene Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sick of Gore's waffling, kanoodling and being coy.
He OBVIOUSLY does not have the good of the country in mind or he'd be red hot with passion about this mess we're in. Time for him to his environmental-thing and get out of the way.
We need a Clark/Edwards ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You have obviously never heard him speak..
He's red hot.

He has shredded the fascist assholes on numerous occasions (with extreme passion and clarity).

How is he in the way? That makes no sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. uh, yeah......
really......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. I call BS.
The time of announcement is a key part of the strategy. It is not a negative. He has to play his cards right. There are others who have not announced yet. He might look like he's waffling to you but he just hasn't made an official announcement at this point.

Al Gore has more passion than just about everyone else in the race.

Al Gore is doing all he is about the environment, and all the other speeches he's making, out of passion alone. It is no longer his job to do any of this. He's doing it out of passion.

So give it up if you're going to say he's lacking passion and is waffling. Not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Self delete.
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 11:49 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. LOL - THIS IS TOO FUNNY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. My prediction for a while now has been Edwards / Clark.

nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm There - Clarkwould make an Excellent choice for anyone
who needs to end the war and doesn't know how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Gore / Gravel
Clark can be Sec of Defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC