|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:28 AM Original message |
WHITE HOUSE ASSERTS EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE-Will NOT Turn Over Docs! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. Well, what a surprise. But Cheney's not part of that branch? Make up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. you beat me to it, I was thinking... that's not a real surprise. They |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:33 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. He IS a part of the branch...until he isn't--until he is...until he isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. And thus... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. Can't do; bush & cheney are ot part of the executive branch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
4. into your corners folks and lets get this fight started |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
6. There's no such thing as executive privilege. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
groovedaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
7. 5-4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Yeah...this is bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #11 |
34. that really is the only option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ioo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:24 AM Response to Reply #7 |
26. I am not so sure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. "They have no loyalty anymore". ARE YOU SERIES1!!11!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Have you been following the cases brought before the supremes? They are worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
9. Nixon tried that argument-with the same lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:05 AM Response to Reply #9 |
19. It will work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #19 |
33. Exactly. These are grim days indeed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:57 AM Response to Reply #19 |
49. That's why Impeachment is their ONLY choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:17 AM Response to Reply #9 |
23. The courts are a lot farther to the right than they were then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #9 |
41. Yes it will. It's not the same judges and justices as it was with Nixon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
12. Has an executive privilege dispute ever been ruled in a Presidents' favor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
13. But , we knew this was coming.. What matters is how it's handled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Annces (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
14. I wonder if Cheney wanted this confrontation all along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
15. Politicizing the DoJ is reprehensible and a criminal offense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #15 |
37. Love to, but HOW? If you've got some ideas, out with 'em. PLEASE. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #37 |
45. Well all else fails, use the sledgehammer in the toolbox. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
16. shoot!! hold them for contempt, shit how many more crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deminks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
17. Contempt of Congress, and therefore in contempt of the American people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
18. Next move from our illustrious DINO "leadership:" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firefox_fan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
38. Way to go! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:57 AM Response to Reply #18 |
39. what is that saying, the pen is mightier than the sword, but in this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
20. Stall, Stall, Stall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
21. then arrest them!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
22. Did anyone see Jonathon Turley on Count Down? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ioo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
24. Republicans Must Be Wishing They did not Go After Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. You forget the NIYAR defense....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
40. I hope its haunts them quickly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
25. It appears the new Dem House & Senate are meaningless without a Dem president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
27. How come the republican court wouldn't let President Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
28. I'm sure Republicans attack the "Executive Privilege" ploy as vigorously as they did when Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
29. "Mutual accommodation" = I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judaspriestess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
35. no one does the double standard dance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
36. Time for some actions, Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:04 AM Response to Reply #36 |
43. dems need to smack these guys down, but it is going to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
42. No surprises from the WH. Will there be any from the Congress? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
44. If you have nothing to hide, you hide nothing, if you have crimes to hide, you hide all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
46. Make up your minds! God, NOTHING surprises me anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
47. The Dems knew this would happen --> so where is plan B - they pretend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
48. IMPEACH! NOW! How many excuses do the Dems need to Impeach? This is INSANE! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC