Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did the Right Bloc of SCOTUS just overturn school integration?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:42 PM
Original message
Did the Right Bloc of SCOTUS just overturn school integration?
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 05:56 PM by usregimechange
:wow:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. They'll call it choice.
So now it's easier for rich white parents to choose not to have their offspring rub elbows with dark, or poor children.

I call it resegregation- and so the Two Americas grow farther apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What the hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes they did!
After the rulings of the past few days, there should be no doubt that Bush's legacy will be his moving the SC to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does Clarence Thomas think he is on the court by merit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
24.  If Thomas were a man of principle and conviction, he would go back to square one...
and start over. But, then again, if Thomas were a man of principle and conviction...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. They overturned antitrust price setting
and 'stare decisis' at the same time, in my opinion.

Bad bad day for the American people. Too bad nobody is going to bother to tell them, because, well, it doesn't fit on a bumper sticker. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackHawk706867 Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. They didn't just try, they did it... This is one of the most disgusting days...
in the history of the SCOTUS IMO.... They just wiped out 40 some years with what can only be called a right wing decission...

ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I haven't got to Kennedy's opinion as of yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. And I edited my title because I trust you more than CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. No--they reinforced "school choice." In answer to the question, yes, indeed they did,
but you won't hear it presented that way on the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I thought NBC and Brian Williams did an excellent report on just what this means.
Stressed how Kennedy read his dissent from the bench for 20 minutes, a highly unusual move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'll watch for that; thank you. I'm terrified this won't be treated with the
gravity it needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes.
This decision just guaranteed the destruction of public education.
It's what they always wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes. As with a woman's right to choose, they are chipping at the precedents.
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 06:09 PM by pinto
Apparently Justice Breyer was uncharacteristically pointed (in that venue) in his oral dissent:

"This is a decision the nation will come to regret."

"Rarely in the history of the law have so few undone so much for so many."


(from - CNN cable news reports)

And Justice Stevens had this to say:

In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens said the majority "reverses course and reaches the wrong conclusion. In doing so, it distorts precedent, it misapplies the relevant constitutional principles, it announces legal rules that will obstruct efforts by state and local governments to deal effectively with the growing resegregation of public schools, it threatens to substitute for present calm a disruptive round of race-related litigation."


(from)

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/06/28/scotus.race/index.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackHawk706867 Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. My serious fear here is that Justice Breyer will resign over this ruling! eom. ww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I think he will stay on because of it and others - stevens will resign
when he turns to dust, but not until then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Exactly. These people are smart enough to know what Bush would do if another opening came up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Insanity still rules.
I understand that Roberts .. ermm.. rewrote history
in his assessment of Brown v. Board of Education
and why it's obsolete.

It's so sad to have such idiots taking places that
should be so full of honor, truth, and gravitas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. They weren't chosen for honor, truth or gravitas
They were chosen to sling through the Bush agenda.
And they are. Right on schedule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackHawk706867 Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. But the real truth is that Roberts (no mater how you slice it) is a Republican...
And that behooves me as to why they put themselves before right vs wrong... That has to be anyone's guess.... There can be no logic in this decission...

ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Not entirely, the children of wealthy sucessful black parents can
continue to go to school with white kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. Overturned school integration and struck a blow against affirmative action
The right has been feverishly attempting to abolish the latter for quite some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Is anyone else a tad POed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramblin_dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. This court is illegitimate anyway
Two of its members were appointed by a person illegitimately exercising the powers of the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. yeah - so: that and $.50 gets you:
jack shit.

Have fun arguing the illegitimacy of the Court at your next trial date. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC