Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court liberals dismay: "It's not often in law that so few have changed so much so quickly."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:33 PM
Original message
Supreme Court liberals dismay: "It's not often in law that so few have changed so much so quickly."
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 11:34 PM by DeepModem Mom
WP: ANALYSIS
Narrow Victories Move Roberts Court to Right
Decisions Ignore Precedent, Liberal Justices Contend
By Charles Lane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 29, 2007; Page A04

....The liberal justices -- Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer -- have taken turns reading their dissenting opinions from the bench in a show of dismay with the court's direction.

"Someone like Ginsburg, who used to be a cautious liberal, is now an angry liberal," said Neil S. Siegel, a professor of law at Duke University and a former law clerk of Ginsburg's....

***

As Roberts read his opinion in the schools cases yesterday, Breyer shifted in his chair, rubbed his temples and occasionally shook his head. When his turn came to read his dissent, Breyer spoke heatedly for almost a half-hour, much longer than the chief justice himself had taken to read his opinion.

The 77-page opinion, twice as long as any other dissent Breyer has written, clearly occupied much of Breyer's time and energy during the term.

As his liberal colleagues have done in their dissents, Breyer accused Roberts and the conservatives of violating stare decisis, the legal principle that decisions should generally be left undisturbed.

"The majority is wrong," Breyer said. "It's not often in law that so few have changed so much so quickly."...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/28/AR2007062802389.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Roberts lied and is a Federalist neocon plant and should now have his Justiceship
...revocked by congress. Better still, send over federal police to arrest and drag his ass out of the SCOTUS for lying to congress. That too must be impeachable. GODDAMN, who the fu*k do these people think they are kidding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh get off of it! Everyone knows Supreme Court justices don't matter!
Nader was right. Republicans are Tweedledee and Democrats are Tweedledum, and Gore would have nominated the same justices that Bush* did.

NOTE: This post is sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "I'm voting my conscience! Who cares who gets hurt in reality-land?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh I'm sorry, did you miss out when the Repukes suspended
HC? Just snoozin through the whole thing? :(

Stupid people should never run the gummit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC