The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-29-07 01:31 PM
Original message |
Ann Coulter reads DU. Here's proof: |
|
Okay, I get points taken off for spellling, but, this is scorched earth. Take a look at this thread which was posted a year ago, and, especially, look at post #10. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=1400146#1400244
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-29-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The word for today is VIRAGO |
|
from Wiki: '"Virago" was a strong, brave, or warlike woman (from Latin "vir", "a man," compare Tomboy). The term was later used to refer to a noisy, bossy, and scolding woman."
It so aptly fits her because she obviously sees herself as the old definition while the world sees only the new.
Let's test it out, anyway.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-29-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I might spell it as "vertigo" or "Viagra."
|
Bitwit1234
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-29-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I know coulter has to because.......... |
|
I explained to the group about a picture of coulter promoting underwear. I explained about the breast implants and how you could see that coulter was definetly not of the female ilk because of the chest above the implants. How the shape of the frame was not female because the belly button was not in the position woman have theirs and several other observations..guess what within two days the picture was taken off the net.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-29-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. They are reading, and milking the material. |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-29-07 02:26 PM by The Backlash Cometh
Months before I found DU, I was on another message board which had a great deal of Republicans and Libertarians participating on it. I made my observation way back then that my beef with the ACLU was that they picked the most extraordinary cases, like pornography, to represent in their belief that those cases protected everybody's freedom of speech. At that time I was very angry because I couldn't risk telling people in my community about some illegal things I suspected were going on for fear I'd be sue. But, it was impossible to find a pro-bono attorney who would be willing to watch my back, so I knew I was gagged because there was no freedom of speech for me. There still isn't.
I didn't go into that much detail, but basically, the general beef I had that my freedom of speech was not ensured just because the ACLU wins pornographic cases was brought up in a right-wing article. I think it was Goldberg, the son.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message |