Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Secret Ballot Compromised - Methodology Exposed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 02:10 PM
Original message
Ohio Secret Ballot Compromised - Methodology Exposed
June 28th, 2007

Press Release with Diagram (PDF)

Privacy expert James Moyer and data analyst Jim Cropcho have discovered a critical flaw in Ohio’s election system that represents a severe threat to the privacy rights of Ohio voters. Using public records, Moyer and Cropcho can demonstrate how to retrieve an individual’s cast ballot in several affected Ohio counties.

“The existence of this vulnerability represents a betrayal of Ohioans, who deserve to vote in security and confidence, free from concerns that secret ballots can become public knowledge,” Moyer said.

The technique takes advantage of the time stamps found on voting machine paper tapes in conjunction with the serial numbers assigned to the voters, which are recorded by the poll workers in the poll books.

“For all practical purposes, we can accurately decode ballots and match them to the voters in the affected counties, at a high level of accuracy, for 2006 voters and all future elections unless substantial changes are made,” Moyer says. As proof of concept, Moyer and Cropcho have decoded a precinct in Delaware County using public records, for an election held in March 2006. A chart, located in the accompanying press release PDF, is provided to explain the method graphically.

http://www.thepublicballot.org/2007/6/28/ohio-secret-ballot-compromised-methodology-exposed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. With punch card ballots, there are fingerprints on the ballot, a useful forensic tool
to determine what percentage of ballots were switched from one precinct to the other to alter who the vote counted for. And, by court order, the 2004 ballots are preserved and in the hands of the Ohio Secretary of State now. The trick, from a forensic point of view, is to make the determination w/o violating the right to a private vote. The determination has to be what percentage of the ballots were switched where, not how each ballot voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe someone should post this in the election forum
thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC