Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY seeks Moves To Ban Public Filming And Photography

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:22 PM
Original message
NY seeks Moves To Ban Public Filming And Photography
Some tourists, amateur photographers, even would-be filmmakers hoping to make it big on YouTube could soon be forced to obtain a city permit and $1 million in liability insurance before taking pictures or filming on city property, including sidewalks.

New rules being considered by the Mayor’s Office of Film, Theater and Broadcasting would require any group of two or more people who want to use a camera in a single public location for more than a half hour to get a city permit and insurance.

The same requirements would apply to any group of five or more people who plan to use a tripod in a public location for more than 10 minutes, including the time it takes to set up the equipment.

Julianne Cho, assistant commissioner of the film office, said the rules were not intended to apply to families on vacation or amateur filmmakers or photographers.

Nevertheless, the New York Civil Liberties Union says the proposed rules, as strictly interpreted, could have that effect. The group also warns that the rules set the stage for selective and perhaps discriminatory enforcement by police.

“These rules will apply to a huge range of casual photography and filming, including tourists taking snapshots and people making short videos for YouTube,” said Christopher Dunn, the group’s associate legal director.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/nyregion/29camera.html?ei=5090&en=71135caff6fefe6a&ex=1340769600&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's just crazy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Even an amateur
photographer might sit around long than an hour for the light to get right for a shot.

Hopefully, they'll rethink this.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. "In a Single Public Location for More Than Half an Hour"
was this language meant to exclude Google Earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh give me a fucking break please!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tired of all the evidence against the police corruption, huh? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is a gimme to well funded filmmakers...
and intented to screw those who are not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They have admitted they will selectively enforce this law
So it will be directed against people of color and those of us who might wear a DU or Buck Fush t-shirt!!! Fascists!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyrone Slothrop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fuck you, Bloomberg, you piece of shit
The NYT, of course, omits the real reason for this law.

They mention Rakesh Sharma, but they neglect the actual reason he was detained. He was a brown person taking snapshots of the city.

http://www.rakeshfilm.com/NYPD/index.htm

'I was physically and verbally assaulted by an NYPD detective even after I had clearly identified myself, produced my passport and offered to put him in touch with my hosts - Professors at Columbia University as well as the New School. I felt his entire tone and tenor to be racist in nature and found him to be intimidatory. It was my impression that the officer's hostility towards me was driven at least in part by the fact that I am brown-skinned and have a beard. To quote him - “We know how to deal with you guys, asshole”. Though later he did offer me a conditional apology "if I was all clear", the question that begs to be asked is - even if I weren't "all clear", does the officer have a right to abuse me physically and verbally, intimidate me and violate my rights?'

One step closer to a police state...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatyaR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's official--we've lost our freaking minds.
Edited on Fri Jun-29-07 06:34 PM by fifthgendem
Is it just me, or does the news make you want to escape the madness even more than the day before? There are some days I can't STAND civilization--if this is civilization.

Or maybe it's just the nonstop rain we've been having that's causing me to feel this way . . . .

ON EDIT:

AAAAAAAAHHHHH--I'm in the 700 Club--HELP!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. When they came for the smokers I said nothing, when they came the photographers...
drip, drip, drip...and before you know it, we ain't got jack and we can't do shit but exist to feed the governmental beast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. As a photographer...
I say this is bullshit. There should be no rules against engaging in photography in public places. Jee-zus, what's this country coming to???!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC