Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our president is bad but Farenheit 9/11 is misleading and presents no alternatives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:23 AM
Original message
Our president is bad but Farenheit 9/11 is misleading and presents no alternatives
Edited on Sat Jun-30-07 10:28 AM by proud2Blib
Three years after his movie came out, we still have the worst president ever. He still plays golf, goes fishing and spends way too much time on vacation. He still walks around holding hands with Arabs. And in spite of the ice cream truck stunt, Congress STILL fails to read the bills they pass.

Curse you, Michael Moore. How dare you make a movie and do NOTHING to solve the problem you point out!!

Why do you hate America, Michael?





I figured we may as well start another Michael Moore bashing thread.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think you forgot the sarcasm icon.
MM speaks for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sorry I thought it was pretty obvious
but I added it. Thanks for the suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Thanks! You had me scared there for a minute!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Did we need one?



I must have slept through something big...I think I'll give the "bash Moore" threads a pass.

I like his work and the messages he brings

Cheers :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Just in case you feel the need to look this one hits all teh TPs we expected:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yes I saw that
Sad indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hear you.
It didn't take long for the bashing to begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's like they expect perfection
Some of these critics today remind me of the folks who criticized F 9/11 but refused to see it. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. I actually met one of those people!
She bashed both Bowling for Columbine AND F 9/11 but never saw either of them!

She actually tried debating the scene in Bowling for Columbine where MM gets an account at a bank for the free gun. She said that the process took place over several days but that MM wore the same clothes to make it appear that it all happened in one day. I guess she read this on a blog or something. Anyway, I had to inform her that the scene also included him filling out a background check and a discussion about how long the %*&@! process would take. Then I told her that if she would take two hours and just watch the damn movie, then she would know what the hell she was talking about. She didn't have anything to say in response to that.

I never watched Passion of the Christ. From the hype and the previews, it just didn't look like anything I would want to see but I don't bash it and pretend to know everything about it in defense for not liking it. It would never occur to me to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, what a knee-jerk assumption ... any criticism of Moore is bashing?
You think only a wingnut could find something to criticize? That borders on idolatry.

Michael doesn't "hate America". Michael is a human being with faults, like all film
makers. I don't agree with anyone 100% of the time, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Pretty much
I think he is usually right. This latest film is his best, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Well, then let me know when the statues are in place so I can stop criticizing him
Don't want to be shot on sight or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. LOL Paranoid?
No need to worry. I don't even own a gun. Bowling for Columbine convinced me I didn't need one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Absolutists always become tyrants
Fundamentalism is the life's blood of a tyrant. I wouldn't be afraid of you, I'd be afraid
of Moore's henchmen. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. The "MM presents no alternatives" was always the funniest argument to me
I never understood how people who watched Faux news could get on MM's case about presenting both sides. It's not like they're use to that sort of thing, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. THANK YOU. We have to have propagandists on the Left because nearly the
entire MSM is RW propaganda and they won't even acknowledge it (which MM has done).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Anyone who says that clearly hasn't seen any of his work.
The alternative is "let's stop allowing the shit I've just been showing you for 2 hours".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Very true. What kind of alternatives were they expecting other than "end the damn war"?
Did they want MM to suggest actual military strategy? Perhaps do the job of our Congress critters and propose a timeline? Had MM presented a detailed plan to end the war in Iraq the same people who now claim to want an alternative would have bashed the man even more for giving them one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Shhh... Don't You Know ??? - MM Made Hillary Look Bad In His Film...
Therefore, the attack of the Bashistas.

Weinstein wanted the scene about Hillary cut, but Moore refused.

Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/21/AR2007062102150.html

And I say... Good for Michael Moore.

:toast:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. That was one of my favorite parts
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. Film says post 93 reform attempt Hillary did not push reform-and running for Senate did not refuse $
from insurance company related doners.

A pretty weak hit in my opinion - indeed I do not see why anyone from Hillary's camp would bother to ask to have it removed - oh wait - they didn't, did they.

It was Harvey Weinstein, whose company provided financing for the film, who wanted it removed who felt that it was not on point and did not move the film along as smoothly as he wanted. And he let Moore have his way despite being a friend of Hillary.

Amazing how some in the media have jumped on this one point and ignored the film's call for single payer national health - hmmmm - maybe the Harvey was correct that the scene screwed up the message and perhaps should have focused not on contributions to politicians, but on the real source of insurance company power - the agents currently working and the former agents that are now in politics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
20. Never mind the troubling content of the movies. Focus on MM instead.
As long as Moore remains the focus, the MSM can avoid confronting the troubling circumstances surrounding 9/11, the questionable ascension of the Bush regime, our horrible health care system, and the greedy, cold-blooded insurance companies who control it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yea, it's Michaels fault for exposing him, then failing to remove him.
damn you moore.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
23. Don't forget to include Cindy Sheehan
DLC detests both of them. Progressives are anathema to their agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Oops
How could I forget Cindy? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellbound-liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
26. I always wonder who the Moore-bashers are trying to protect
I mean, why would anybody in their right mind, unless they are paid, jump to the defense of the US Health Care System? I've spent many times in emergency rooms in the US and the visit has NEVER been less than 4 hours. Things obviously aren't right in this country and yet people insist on defending the status quo by attacking someone who points out its faults. I just don't understand why anyone would defend the current system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
27. That twit David Denby trashes "Sicko" in his "New Yorker" review this week
Edited on Sat Jun-30-07 11:24 AM by mitchum
takes issue with Moore's approach and tone.
Screw him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC