|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 02:54 PM Original message |
How about "prick flicks" for a change? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taterguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Great article, really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Bret Easton Ellis movies would be 'sick flicks'. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. SPAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. Fine by me. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. BBM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
entanglement (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. JMHO - but I'd only use such a pithy phrase to describe Adam Sandler movies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. No defense of prick lit... but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 02:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Austen was 18th century and the Brontes 19th century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Actually Steinem cites sources from the 16th/17th (Shakespeare) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnieworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
10. Dick flicks would be nicer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 06:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. IMO "chick" is sort of intermediate between "dick" and "prick" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
12. No. Since prick is slang for penis, the term suggests it is a counterpart to "beaver flicks" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
13. Like the psycho therapist in the Geico-Caveman commercials... "that doesn't make sense to me" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. For a change? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elspeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 09:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Yeah, but this way it would have a marginalizing label too instead of being considered mainstream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I already have a marginalizing label for both "chick" and "prick" flicks: STUPID |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnieworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. and highly sucessful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
18. Its not calling a certain music genre 'cock rock' dissuaded anyone from listening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC