Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How about "prick flicks" for a change?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 02:54 PM
Original message
How about "prick flicks" for a change?
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/56219/

That's also why you're left with only half a guide. As usual, bias punishes everyone. Therefore I propose, as the opposite of "chick flick" and an adjective of your very own, "prick flick." Not only will it serve film critics well, but its variants will add to the literary lexicon. For example, "prick lit" could characterize a lot of fiction, from Philip Roth to Bret Easton Ellis and beyond. "True prick" could guide readers to their preferred non-fiction, from the classics of Freud to the populist works of socio-biologists and even Rush Limbaugh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great article, really
It sustained my short attention span, but maybe because there aren't any decent war movies on the tube right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bret Easton Ellis movies would be 'sick flicks'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. SPAR
TA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fine by me. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. BBM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. JMHO - but I'd only use such a pithy phrase to describe Adam Sandler movies
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-07-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. No defense of prick lit... but....
Edited on Sat Jul-07-07 04:35 PM by Jed Dilligan
Is any of the "chick lit" of today actually as good as the books Steinem re-genders? And weren't Jane Austen and the Brontes from roughly the same time? And don't we remember them because they were good, just as we don't remember Flaubert, Tolstoy, et al. because they had pricks?

We are in a literary and artistic slump and it has nothing to do with gender.

on edit: I got frustrated reading the article because I thought she would give at least one example of good lit that's been suppressed due to female authorship. Because, dammit, I'm looking for something to read!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Austen was 18th century and the Brontes 19th century
Austen has often been put down as trivial. I think she's so readable today because her habit of showing characters interacting instead of having so much author-omniscient parenthetical explaining anticipates modern practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Actually Steinem cites sources from the 16th/17th (Shakespeare)
to the 20th century (Williams). There were not as many female authors as male, but those who were great survived--just as bad male authors went down in oblivion. The reason for the gender gap was sexism in social structure--women were not given the opportunity to write and publish, just as poor men generally were not.

I don't approve of Steinem's vision of the genders as two giant personalities engaged in an eternal struggle. It seems like just another formula for shutting people out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dick flicks would be nicer
Prick has such a negative connotation. You can have a Dick without being a Dick but generally Prick means you are a Prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. IMO "chick" is sort of intermediate between "dick" and "prick" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. No. Since prick is slang for penis, the term suggests it is a counterpart to "beaver flicks"
Guy/ Dude movies or flicks would work, but prick flicks is too suggestive of porno
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Like the psycho therapist in the Geico-Caveman commercials... "that doesn't make sense to me"

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. For a change?
As if macho bullshit hasn't dominated the film industry for the past 30 years?

:spray: Yeah, right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah, but this way it would have a marginalizing label too instead of being considered mainstream
I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I already have a marginalizing label for both "chick" and "prick" flicks: STUPID
However, stupidity is pretty mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. and highly sucessful
I was flipping past one of those Julia Roberts monstrosities last night, I think My Best Fried's wedding. I couldn't believe it but there was a musical number in it. But not in a Broadway way but an odd, everyone is singing the same thing enthusiastically and in reality. It looked like a rehearsal dinner and everyone was singing a known song which escapes me. It went on and on and I watched like I was rubbernecking a horrible accident. Why is this passing for entertainment? I recall this being a big hit too. I'll sooner understand quantum physics before I get Julia Roberts appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. Its not calling a certain music genre 'cock rock' dissuaded anyone from listening



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC