Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators Ready Iraq Amendments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 12:34 PM
Original message
Senators Ready Iraq Amendments
http://public.cq.com/docs/cqt/news110-000002546463.html

Senators Ready Iraq Amendments
By Josh Rogin, CQ Staff

The debate over the Iraq War resumes in the Senate on Monday, when Democrats will use the defense authorization bill to spotlight their demands to bring U.S. troops home.

snip//

According to Senate aides, the first amendment lawmakers will debate, by freshman and former Navy Secretary Jim Webb, D-Va., would mandate an amount of time for active duty soldiers to rest at home that is equal to the length of their deployments. Currently, Army soldiers deploy for fifteen months after twelve months at home.

“This is the bottom line that we owe to people who have been sent into harm’s way.” Webb said.

Another key amendment to be offered would sunset Congress’ 2002 authorization for the use of force in Iraq (PL 107–243). This language, to be introduced by Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., and Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., would amend the law so it expires Oct. 11, 2007, the fifth anniversary of its enactment.

The Clinton-Byrd amendment also would require the president to seek a new authorization for the Iraq War, forcing him to spell out the mission, strategy, and goals of the U.S. presence there, according to a draft version.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. the problem with the Clinton-Byrd approach is the residual force
they envision remaining to fight those identified as 'al-Qaeda'. The same 'al-Qaeda' that the U.S. troop presence has inspired and fueled. But, the call for a new authorization is overdue.

The Webb effort is interesting in that it could restrict the way Bush deploys the troops making it almost impossible to conduct the occupation as he has so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC