Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just a quick time out to review the energy policy of a Dem president 30 years ago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 01:00 PM
Original message
Just a quick time out to review the energy policy of a Dem president 30 years ago
Edited on Sun Jul-08-07 01:01 PM by burythehatchet
The first principle is that we can have an effective and comprehensive energy policy only if the government takes responsibility for it and if the people understand the seriousness of the challenge and are willing to make sacrifices.

The second principle is that healthy economic growth must continue. Only by saving energy can we maintain our standard of living and keep our people at work. An effective conservation program will create hundreds of thousands of new jobs.

The third principle is that we must protect the environment. Our energy problems have the same cause as our environmental problems -- wasteful use of resources. Conservation helps us solve both at once.

The fourth principle is that we must reduce our vulnerability to potentially devastating embargoes. We can protect ourselves from uncertain supplies by reducing our demand for oil, making the most of our abundant resources such as coal, and developing a strategic petroleum reserve.

The fifth principle is that we must be fair. Our solutions must ask equal sacrifices from every region, every class of people, every interest group. Industry will have to do its part to conserve, just as the consumers will. The energy producers deserve fair treatment, but we will not let the oil companies profiteer.

The sixth principle, and the cornerstone of our policy, is to reduce the demand through conservation. Our emphasis on conservation is a clear difference between this plan and others which merely encouraged crash production efforts. Conservation is the quickest, cheapest, most practical source of energy. Conservation is the only way we can buy a barrel of oil for a few dollars. It costs about $13 to waste it.

The seventh principle is that prices should generally reflect the true replacement costs of energy. We are only cheating ourselves if we make energy artificially cheap and use more than we can really afford.

The eighth principle is that government policies must be predictable and certain. Both consumers and producers need policies they can count on so they can plan ahead. This is one reason I am working with the Congress to create a new Department of Energy, to replace more than 50 different agencies that now have some control over energy.

The ninth principle is that we must conserve the fuels that are scarcest and make the most of those that are more plentiful. We can't continue to use oil and gas for 75 percent of our consumption when they make up seven percent of our domestic reserves. We need to shift to plentiful coal while taking care to protect the environment, and to apply stricter safety standards to nuclear energy.

The tenth principle is that we must start now to develop the new, unconventional sources of energy we will rely on in the next century.


http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carter/filmmore/ps_energy.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was only in 4th grade at the time,
Edited on Sun Jul-08-07 01:06 PM by Maestro
but I bet he was brutally attacked and completely blamed for the energy crisis. I consider him one of our better presidents before and after his presidency. I would sure like to hear the congress critters talk like this more often, but most are too beholden to "Big Oil" especially my critter, Joe Barton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. across the board, or so it seemed, he was attacked and vilified
he was compeletely ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jimmy Carter's speech was very prescient ...
He understood where we would be today if we ignored his proposals ... sadly very few listened.

:loveya:Jimmy Carter:loveya:, as close to hero to worship as I get
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommended!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was just graduating HS at that time and busy making plans
Plans for drinking a lot of beer that summer and what college to party at in the fall.
Times have changed so much since then, but Jimmy's 5th principle killed the whole thing, there wasn't any way for the rich to get richer and they wouldn't let that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I graduated HS the following year and all I can remember about this are
the SNL skits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Carter was a victim in the formation of OPEC.
That change shocked the oil market and spiked pricing. We were far more dependent on our industrial economic sector, so this affected everything. He understand the issue and laid out a strategy that called for some sacrifice and new alternative/renewable energy strategies, independent on foreign oil.

As soon as Bush-Reagan came into office, they pretty much dismantled Carter's DOE. They negotiated cheap oil with SA....great short-term strategy and profitable to the Bush family and their friends in Houston. But that just delayed the day of reckoning. Their actions set the table for the Iraqi oil grab in 2003. We've squandered 30 years, trillions of dollars, and we are more dependent then ever on ME oil. Had enough of Republican/Big Oil energy policy yet, America?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Carter was the victim of "America Held Hostage" and the Reagan campaign took full advantage of it
Edited on Sun Jul-08-07 08:21 PM by struggle4progress
Carter had decided his objective was to bring all the hostages home alive, and in fact all did return. But they were not freed while Carter held office:

Iran Hostage Anniversary
Saturday Is 20 Years Since Americans Held In Iran Were Released
WASHINGTON, Jan. 18, 2001

Jimmy Carter spent his last minutes in office trying to end the 444-day Iran hostage crisis that many say cost him the presidency. He even took a telephone with him to Ronald Reagan's swearing in and was engaged in last-minute talks as the two drove up to the Capitol. But it was the newly inaugurated President Reagan who made the announcement that afternoon - that the 52 American hostages had been released from Tehran and were coming home. ~snip~

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/01/18/iran/main265244.shtml


The facts that emerged in Reagan's second term, as part of the Iran-contra scandal, were somewhat odd:

FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES, APR. 15, 1991
The Election Story of the Decade
BY GARY SICK

Suspicions about a deal between the Reagan campaign and Iran over the hostages have circulated since the day of President Reagan's inaugural, when Iran agreed to release the 52 American hostages exactly five minutes after Mr. Reagan took the oath of office. Later, as it became known that arms started to flow to Iran via Israel only a few days after the inauguration, suspicions deepened that a secret arms-for-hostages deal had been concluded. ~snip~

I was a member of the Carter Administration and on the staff of the National Security Council from August 1976 to April 1981, with responsibility for monitoring Iran policy. I first heard these rumors in 1981 and I dismissed them as fanciful. I again heard them during the 1988 election campaign, and I again refused to believe them. I had worked in and around the Middle East long enough to be skeptical of the conspiracy theories that abound in the region.

Then two years ago, I began collecting documentation for a book on the Reagan Administration's policies toward Iran. That effort grew into a massive computerized data base, the equivalent of many thousands of pages. As I sifted through this mass of material, I began to recognize a curious pattern in the events surrounding the 1980 election. Increasingly, I began to focus on that period, and interviewed a wide range of sources. I benefited greatly from the help of many interested, talented investigative journalists.

In the course of hundreds of interviews, in the U.S., Europe and the Middle East, I have been told repeatedly that individuals associated with the Reagan-Bush campaign of 1980 met secretly with Iranian officials to delay the release of the American hostages until after the Presidential election. For this favor, Iran was rewarded with a substantial supply of arms from Israel. ~snip~

http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_cr/h920205-october-clips.htm




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yes, another amazing coincidence...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Brilliant.
Conservation is a very important and powerful concept we've completely lost sight of. Flagrant is the word that comes to mind when describing the people whom I live amongst in this country.

Wow, have we come a long ways, backwards, since then. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Carter Was a Visionary
An uncompromisingly ethical (his downfall) and surprisingly freethinking - given the fundamentalism - President in the proverbial pit of snakes looking for paybacks after the Watergate debacle. He either didn't know how to play the game or refused to do so. History will vindicate him.

I told him this myself via e-mail a number of years ago. And what really floored me was that he personally replied and thanked me, signing himself "Jimmy." He really IS the homespun, direct and reliable guy people laughed at, folks; and I never understood why the derision. We lost a great chance to maintain continuity with our environmental imperatives AND middle-East diplomacy by not re-electing him.

Our stupidity, IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Welcome aboard!
He truly was a great and ethical President. Too bad he was undermined by the Republican Party whose only allegiance seems to be service to the Top 50 corporations. I cannot fathom how the American people have tolerated Republican governance in the 30 years since they stole Carter's re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kick for Jimmy Carter, a great American patriot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. But the news media whined and complained
They thought Carter was "too serious", expecting Americans to make too many sacrifices. :sarcasm:

This proves its not rocket science to come up with a new energy policy, just dust off the old ones, update them a little and get it done.

Carter also proposed using the "excess profits" tax, a special tax on energy profits that resulted from price gouging. He took the money from the tax and used it to invest in alternative energy and conservations programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC