Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I thought Cindy was going to take a rest??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:24 AM
Original message
I thought Cindy was going to take a rest??
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 12:25 AM by quinnox
WTF is this, she said she was tired of the politics and her always getting flak and now she inserts herself once again.

She said she was tired around a month ago and now here she is again, popping up. Grabbing the spotlight. She just can't stay away can she?

You know, maybe she should do what she said and leave the politics to the politicians for awhile!

Hell yea, why not take a rest Cindy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cindy Sheehan speaks for me....
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Sad.
Shouldn't you speak for yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
53. I speak for me
It is certainly her right to run for office if she so chooses. But I'd rather she didn't make statements for anyone but herself. In the article about this announcement, she talked about how "Democrats were getting tired..." That never ceases to annoy me, no matter who's making the declaration, when someone speaks for a whole group of people who did not elect that person as their spokesperson.

Meanwhile, I will give Cindy credit for the attention she's raising in the press, bringing up impeachement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. yea you are right
You have made several good points in this thread I agree with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Guess She Is Rested Up
Apparently, she doesn't need as much rest as Bush does. Why does that bother you? GO CINDY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. She is leaving the peace movement and she sold Camp Casey
She never said anything about leaving politics. She is not a politician. But now she is considering becoming one. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. A new direction
good for her. Not sure why this bothers anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Because they are party loyalists
Unfortunately, some are more concerned about the damn party than the country. Being a loyal Democrat is more important than ending the fucking war.

Sad indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #33
48. Some of us believe that getting a Dem elected to president is the best way to end the war
And that these third party tangents help little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #48
60. Um Cindy isn't running for president
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 02:38 AM by proud2Blib
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
42. It doesn't look like she's leaving the peace movement after all
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 09:07 AM by DesertRat
She sold her land in Crawford, but she's still setting up Camp Casey.

8/25/2007 - Kennebunkport
Please join Cindy Sheehan, Melida and Carlos Arredondo, Iraq Veterans and people of conscience on our march to the family estate of George W. Bush. Cindy Sheehan will be setting up a CAMP CASEY & CAMP ALEX at a farm near the Bush estate.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=1281005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Semantics
She is now a part of what she calls the human rights movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. But Maybe, You Should Take Your Own Advice nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Publicity and fame are POWERFUL items.
She is headed for a rude awakening. She was useful when the users wanted a tool. Now she will find her 15 minutes were merely tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. yea you right
Cindy is in for a rude awakening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. She did take a rest.
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 12:36 AM by WilliamPitt
When was the last time you took six weeks off from work? She did, and it is a credit to her integrity that she is unwilling to stay out of the fight. We need every body and every voice if we're going to get anything done, and she has proven her ability to move the pile.

Now...

WTF is this, she said she was tired of the politics and her always getting flak and now she inserts herself once again.

Inserts herself? She's an American with the right of free speech. If more Americans "inserted" themselves into the system with 0.0001% of her energy and dedication, we wouldn't be in this mess.

She said she was tired around a month ago and now here she is again, popping up. Grabbing the spotlight. She just can't stay away can she?

Again, six weeks of sleep and good food and no traveling can work wonders. "Grabbing the spotlight" is what activists do, thank God. No, she can't stay away. Neither can I, and neither can anyone who cares about their country.

By the way, she never said she was quitting. The word was "retooling," to find a more effective means of making change. It seems she has decided that campaigning for office, or considering a run, is the retool.

You know, maybe she should do what she said and leave the politics to the politicians for awhile!

Yeah, cuz that's worked out pretty well, right?

For the record, I am not in favor of her running against Pelosi. I like the threat as a means to push the issues, but an actual run won't do any good for her or anyone else. But a) That's just my opinion, and b) No matter what, I respect Cindy Sheehan to the skies. She does not deserve the kind of rubbish you've written here...and by the way, the phrase you're groping for is "attention whore." The charge is as bullshit now as it was six weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. What are you going to do about it? Call her a 'Attention Whore'?
:sarcasm::eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. "leave the politics to the politicians"
That's really cool how you made it sound like politicians are a whole other species entirely, and not just people who run for office and then get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I like that statement also "leave the politics to the politicians".
wtf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe she just got too pissed off
I know alot of us are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. Why even start this topic if you really believe what you write...
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 01:02 AM by uppityperson
"Cindy is in for a rude awakening.

I think she will just embarrass herself.

I'm not going to call her a whore but it does seem like she can't get enough of the media attention and spotlight.

Let sheehan run she will get her ass kicked. She is no threat at all, it will be a humiliating defeat but I do agree this is perfectly reasonable for anyone to challenge an incumbent if they are unhappy with them. "


What is your problem? Edited to add ah, search shows me you won't go see Sicko because it doesn't present both sides of the story, you missed Live Earth yet watched it and was underwhelmed yet didn't "feel like I missed anything".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Were you here earlier today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. What do you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. why not just ignore her if you really believe what you write?You seem to be in a hot mood today.
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 01:06 AM by uppityperson
"Cindy is in for a rude awakening.

I think she will just embarrass herself.

I'm not going to call her a whore but it does seem like she can't get enough of the media attention and spotlight.

Let sheehan run she will get her ass kicked. She is no threat at all, it will be a humiliating defeat but I do agree this is perfectly reasonable for anyone to challenge an incumbent if they are unhappy with them. "

You obviously think she is no problem, yet have to chime in about her. Why?

Sicko, Live Earth, Cindy Sheehan. What next? You seem to like starting hot topics, speaking of attention seekers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I don't know maybe
just for the hell of it. Sometimes I post on impulse, depends on what the hot topic is, right now it is cindy sheehan.
I guess I don't take this all as deadly serious as some others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. Now I see
why your threads get locked. Maybe you should make a right turn and try posting elsewhere. You're posts would probably last longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Yeah.. Why should Cindy be "deadly serious"? Why should we?
It's just a message board after all. Nobody here but us citizens. There's nothing serious about dead soldiers, after all. I guess everyone should just "lighten up".(:sarcasm:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. I agree
But this seems like an opportunity for me to apologize as well.

This is a site for Democrats and I guess it just really got under my skin seeing Nancy Pelosi getting skewered here for not charging headfirst into impeachment proceedings. In my opinion, it would not be wise or fruitful (and potentially would backfire), but I was wrong to be somewhat (or totally) obnoxious about it.

My position remains the same, but I hope those of you I butted heads with accept my apology for how I went about it.

Peace, hope, and happiness to you all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. She Should Run for Nancy's Seat After Nancy Becomes President
If Bush** and DarthCheney are impeached and removed from office, then Nancy Pelosi becomes President.
That would open up a vacancy in the House. Presumably there would have to be a special election.
She could run in that election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
21. So what? Everyone gets tired, and everyone changes their mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. She can't help herself
She got her 15 minutes of fame via her son's unfortunate death, she knows that that's her only claim to "fame" (sad and sick as it is), she's been riding it ever since quite shamefully but successfully, and she's too fucking stupid to know when to shut the hell up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Vile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
35. Exhibit A as to why we need Cindy
It pisses off the simpletons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
47. Sadly, over 3000 mothers lost offspring to that war. Not all got 15 minutes of fame.
Just MAYBE she got attention because she got up AND DID SOMETHING constructive with her grief?

"... too fucking stupid to know when to shut the hell up." applies to someone much closer to you than Cindy Sheehan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #23
71. Your Perception Is Monumentally Flawed.
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 09:10 AM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
I don't agree with Cindy whatsoever with this and no longer support her actions. There is a big difference in being disenfranchised with her methods/actions and actually personally attacking her in such a brutally ignorant manner.

I don't agree with what she's doing now at all. But I don't question for a second that she believes wholeheartedly that she is doing the right thing in the best ways she can in the sincerest memory of her beloved son. It disgusts me to the highest level to see such ignorant attacks on her character as if she's not being genuine (even if wrong) and doing this all for selfish dishonorable reasons.

The only thing shameful is attacks like yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dEMOK Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
24. Have you lost a son to a needless war...
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 02:09 AM by dEMOK
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #24
49. Would you grant the same courtesy to a freeper mother who'd lost her son in this war?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. Yes. I have and I do.
Mothers are mothers. We all have that in common. Our children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dEMOK Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #49
61. LittleClarkie, my question was directed at the OP, but OK......
...have you lost a son to a needless war?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
27. What's the big deal? She won't win or even be a spoiler
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 04:36 AM by Hippo_Tron
I think Independent candidates are only worth getting worked up over when they have the potential to help a Republican get elected. In this case, there is zero chance of that. She knows that she can't win and she knows that she isn't enabling a Republican to win.
I don't see the need to trash her.

Most people here agree with her message, but some just find the need to complain about the way she delivers it. Her delivery, IMO, isn't doing any harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
30. She's a grieving mother, not an activist or politician
I don't think she would make a good representative - it would take paying attention to other issues, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
34. Apparently she decided she didn't need to check in with you when her rest was over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
36. I liked you better back in the day when all you would do was defend Lieberman
Is there no one around to call "anti-semitic" anymore?

Ahhh,those were the DU days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
37. SHE'S NADER IN DRAG!
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 08:15 AM by Bonobo
What a narcissistic, delusional egomaniacal two-timer!

She probably wanted her son dead so she could split the Democratic party!

She's Ralph Nader with tits! Take a rest, lady! Leave politics to the politicians!

On Edit, for those without a sense of sarcasm:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
38. This thread is loaded with disrupters
Amazing how they pop up whenever Ms. Sheehan is mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. For which side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Anti Sheehan
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 08:44 AM by kingofalldems
Actually I predicted this a few days back. Do a search in GD on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
39. OMG!!!! She CHANGED HER MIND???? how DARE she.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #39
58. Gee. I guess that makes her a flip-flopper!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
43. She was going to but felt sorry that all you had to whine about was Live Earth and Michael Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #43
54. !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. And you two thought my Nader thread was bad....
At least I took my ass-whooping in stride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #59
65. LOL
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 06:01 AM by Forkboy
You were a good sport. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
45. She took a rest, saw the Dems not doing shit, and came back.
Why don't you take a rest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
46. DU is always good for a "shit on Cindy" thread. ALWAYS.
  And that's something to think about. Is it surprising? I would think so. I would think we would all be surprised about those kinds of sentiments here.

From Poll question: How does DU feel about Cindy Sheehan?:
Poll result (453 votes)
"I applaud Cindy's Sheehan's heroic efforts to end the occupation in Iraq." (362 votes, 80%)
"Cindy Sheehan is an "attention whore." Good riddance to her." (91 votes, 20%)


  This place likes to view itself one way but anyone can just simply read the messages and see what the sentiments are. That poll, btw, was much closer to fifty-fifty. And then a huge number of votes came in much later to push the "whore" vote down.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. With shit like this it's not hard to see why we're still in Iraq.
We have plenty of "democrats" that just love to shill for BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
51. Why don't you give it a rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
55. Not A Sheenan Supporters-Do not Get People
When I saw I am not a Sheenan supporter I do not mean I do not think she has a right to protest the war or a right to run for office. I just do not think it is the greatest thing to do. I tend to not be a supporter of a one issue candidate. So far it seems that her one and only issue is the war in Iraq.

I too would like to see the war come to an end, but I do not get some people here at DU and in America in general. I do not see why so many people are upset with Pelosi and the Democrats for not ending the war. I do not mean to be mean, but were people living in a fantasy land. I never thought the Democrats would be able to really end this war without a Democratic president unless Bush decided to end the war. I could understand if Pelosi and the Democrats had not done anything at all or had not tried to do anything at all, but they have actually tried to get Bush to move in a direction to end the war. So far Bush has not wanted to end the war. Democrats do not have that much power in that no matter what bill they push Bush can veto the bill. Furthermore, the Democrats though in the majority do not have a big enough majority to override Bush's veto. Therefore, there is really not way to end the war. I can image some will say all the Democrats have to do is attach the spending requirement to a bill that Bush cannot veto and then you have it. However, we all know Bush loves to use executive orders and signing statements. Even if the Democrats would attach spending requirements which defunded the war Bush probably would just sign the bill and then issue a signing statement saying he does not have to follow the bill. In addition, I can image it is possible for Bush to just take money from some other project and spend that money on the war. So as far as I can see there is really no way to end the Iraq war until after 2008.

For all those angry that Pelosi is not pushing for impeachment you should look at what could happen if Pelosi pushes for impeachment. Democrats of today need to constantly look at the Nixon/Ford period as a guide. Ford was not the Speaker of the House when he became the Vice President. If Pelosi pushes for impeachment the issue could really backfire in the face of the Democrats. I have no doubt that Cheney and the gang would not allow Pelosi to rise to the presidency. I contend that if Pelosi and the Democrats push for impeachment Cheney will resign and either McCain or Rice will be put in his place. I guess the Democrats of today are in a better position than the ones in Nixon's time in that they may have a bigger majority so maybe Pelosi could get vote as the Vice President anyway. However, it is possible that Rice would get the vote. If that happens and the Democrats all of a sudden decided they will not impeach Bush the Republicans will be able to say the Democrats do not want to continue because a black female who happens to be a Republican would fill Bush place. That could cause many problems for the Democrats in the future. Unless it is guaranteed that Pelosi will be Vice President before Bush resigns the Democrats should just leave impeachment off the table.

Finally, the Democrats have done a great deal since they came into office. They were able to do a number of things they had put on the 100 days agenda. One of those things was raising the minimum wage. They have done other things, but I cannot completely remember those things; however, they have not just sat in Congress and done nothing. I see no reason Pelosi should be removed as Speaker of the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. I agree that we need a Dem president. That's what I work for.
And thank you for pointing out that the Dems have done things since getting into office. I'm getting sick of people saying that Pelosi and the Dems have done nothing. It makes me think they've not been paying attention, and makes our job that much harder in 2008 if the myth that the Dems have done nothing gets in the voters heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dEMOK Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
62. quinnox, I'll ask again -- Have you lost a son to a needless war...
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. And why is that relevant? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #63
66. It's relevant because Cindy did. Hello?
And maybe,just maybe,those of you who rag on her might want to try the empathy thing because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #63
67. It's relevant because YOU WERE THE ONE TO CALL HER "ATTENTION WHORE"
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 06:13 AM by Bluebear
Even though she lost a son to this war, you punk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #63
68. because--DUH--her whole mission was founded on the question WHY
her son died, "for what noble cause?"

--but according to you, she is just an "attention whore." Somehow you, like your friend the OP, seem to think the way to fight is to drop out of sight--not even "be seen and not heard," don't even be seen. Kind of like overgrown adolescents who comfortably spend all day in mom's basement playing video games while insulting those who are sacrificing and taking risks to ensure that they can continue to be idiotic boneheads. You need to come upstairs once in a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
64. gee, would you have said that about Martin Luther King Jr?
I mean, look at the way he was always "popping up" and "grabbing the spotlight," risking not only ridicule but also actual death -- and there is no guarantee that some idiot won't come out of nowhere and try to assassinate Cindy as well. I don't even need to google to know she must have received some death threats by now. Yet she pushes on -- for her own self-aggrandizement, according to you.

Apparently your idea of activism is to sit in a closet talking to yourself, keeping it as low-key as possible. Gee, we wouldn't want to "rock the boat" or anything, now, would we?
Your total lack of understanding of her motives, and of the need for "popping up" is pathetic.

"leave the politics to the politicians" -- I don't know whether to laugh or cry at that, it is so ignorant. what part of "government by, for, and of the people" do you not understand? "politicians" are the scum of the earth as far as I'm concerned--with their palms out, in bed with corporate fat-cats, talking out of the sides of their mouths, screwing over the voters. It is way WAY past time for citizens to take their rightful place in the running of their own country, as is supposed to be the case in a democracy.

By the way, what sacrifices have YOU made, WHAT RISKS HAVE YOU TAKEN that make you think you are so lofty and wise?
Since you think activists should keep a low profile, I suspect your answer to that would have to be zilch, nada, nothing. You have not even a particle of understanding of what it means to battle "the establishment."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hideboh Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
69. oh please
how can one possibly blame her for working so hard to stop this nonsense oil grabbing endeavor.
Instead of mocking her, just find more positive things to do for the sake of your country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
70. attention, attention, attention. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
72. Were we using that spotlight for something more meaningful than bringing the troops home? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC