Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tricky Ricky: Staying the Course

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 07:20 AM
Original message
Tricky Ricky: Staying the Course
Staying the Course

Former GOP senator Rick Santorum believes his staunch defense of the Iraq War helped lead to his defeat. But he still believes U.S. troops need to continue the fight.



WEB EXCLUSIVE
By Sam Stein
Newsweek
Updated: 8:03 p.m. ET July 6, 2007

July 6, 2007 - On Thursday, GOP Sen. Pete Domenici became the third prominent member of his party in the past two weeks to part ways with President Bush on the Iraq War. The 34-year Senate veteran from New Mexico joined Republican colleagues Richard Lugar of Indiana and George Voinovich of Ohio in calling for a “new strategy” that would move the troops out of combat operations.

With growing unease on the right about prolonged U.S. engagement in Iraq, the White House is finding it more difficult to find defenders of its policies. But in an interview with NEWSWEEK’s Sam Stein, former GOP senator Rick Santorum criticized his former colleagues who have broken with their commander in chief. After losing his seat last fall, Santorum became a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, a Washington think tank dedicated to applying “Judeo-Christian moral tradition to critical issues of public policy.” He’s also writing a book on radical Islam and global terrorism. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: What are your thoughts on the GOP senators who have recently spoken out against Bush on the war?

Rich Santorum: I’m very disappointed that my colleagues are, I think, bowing clearly to the political pressure of the moment that is out there across America. Americans are frustrated with the prosecution of this war. They don’t understand why we’re in it. They don’t see any reason to continue the fight and instead of going out there and arguing more clearly than the administration has to this point, and putting this in the proper perspective for the American public, have decided to join the other side and abandon ship. I think that’s absolutely irresponsible and will come back to haunt us as a party.

But aren’t they merely listening to their constituents, who by and large want a change in America’s Iraq policy?

Constituency always plays a role. The question is how much of a role? From my perspective, I listened very intently to the folks of my state but ultimately I did what I believed was of the best interest for my state and country. And I lost because of it. I’m sure all of these members are hearing it. People are not happy with the war, period … There are lots of reasons for frustration, but that does not excuse poor policy.



Looks like man-on-dog santorum is still insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. So Rethugs need to "argue more clearly than the Admin." ? What makes
Ricky think there are any more arguments that haven't been used in five years already. Hell, the * Admin. went through at least ten arguments within a year and a half of getting into Iraq.

"Constituency always plays a role" - gee, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC