Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senior WH Official: When you count up the votes that we’ve lost (over Iraq) it looks pretty grim

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:26 PM
Original message
Senior WH Official: When you count up the votes that we’ve lost (over Iraq) it looks pretty grim
White House now planning for a “Post-Surge Redeployment.”


from the NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/09/washington/09prexy.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&ref=todayspaper%E2%80%9D&pagewanted=print


White House Debate Rises on Iraq Pullback

By DAVID E. SANGER
July 9, 2007

“When you count up the votes that we’ve lost and the votes we’re likely to lose over the next few weeks, it looks pretty grim,” said one senior official, who, like others involved in the discussions, would not speak on the record about internal White House deliberations.

That conclusion was echoed in interviews over the past few days by administration officials in the Pentagon, State Department and White House, as well as by outsiders who have been consulted about what the administration should do next. “Sept. 15 now looks like an end point for the debate, not a starting point,” the official said. “Lots of people are concluding that the president has got to get out ahead of this train.”

In a sign of the concern, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates canceled plans for a four-nation tour of Latin America this week and will stay home to attend meetings on Iraq, the Pentagon announced yesterday.

Last week, Mr. Bush’s national security adviser, Stephen J. Hadley, called in from a brief vacation to join intense discussions in sessions that included Karl Rove, Mr. Bush’s longtime strategist, and Joshua B. Bolten, the White House chief of staff.

Officials describe the meetings as more of a running discussion than an argument. They say that no one is clinging to a stay-the-course position but that instead aides are trying to game out what might happen if the president becomes more specific about the start and the shape of what the White House is calling a “post-surge redeployment.”

article: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/09/washington/09prexy.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&ref=todayspaper%E2%80%9D&pagewanted=print


http://journals.democraticunderground.com/bigtree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. All they care about is the lost votes, not the lost and ruined lives
of Americans and Iraqis alike that resulted from their lies and disastrous incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. that's what makes our democratic system work
sometimes.

The upcoming elections look like they're shaping up to be a pretty brilliant motivator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. BS come Aug 1 Bush will be on his one month vacation
Nothing stand in way of that :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. with any luck the doors will be barred when he returns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. it makes my blood boil every time I see rove's name -
a completely unprincipled political hack, never elected to anything, never confirmed by the Senate, participating in "strategy" discussions affecting the most crucial of national policy issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. playing politics
with our soldiers' lives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought these were the guys that created reality. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. WH is afraid that the oil law won't be passed before they are forced out of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It looks more and more like
the Iraqi's are becoming aware that they are being raped and pillaged

the "oil law" is a dead duck, I hope

That it was set up as the primary "benchmark" is as transparent as guarding only the refineries and oilfields right after the invasion

If our Congress had refused to include the part about giving 78% to Big Oil I'd have found them a lot more credible when they passed the spending bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalkydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. that's the first
honest thing they have admitted in years. There's hope for them yet.....NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC