Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dingell Playing Troublemaker?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 08:39 AM
Original message
Dingell Playing Troublemaker?
http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/dingell_playing_troublemaker?tx=3

Dingell Playing Troublemaker?

Submitted by Bill Scher on July 9, 2007 - 7:28pm.

As I've reported twice before, Rep. John Dingell, chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and longtime ally of automakers, has been sending mixed messages about his intentions on global warming. It's been unclear if that's because his views were evolving in a positive direction, or he's trying to keep enviromental critics off-balance.

His latest gambit indicates the latter.

Dingell raised eyebrows last month when he indicated support for a tax on carbon emissions, an idea backed fervently by some environmentalists but generally rejected by Democrats in Congress as politically impractical.

But in a C-SPAN interview aired yesterday, Dingell said he'll introduce carbon tax legislation with the intention to show it's a political loser: "I sincerely doubt that the American people will be willing to pay what this is really going to cost them."

John Laumer of Treehugger sees Dingell's move as a way to derail attempts to raise automobile fuel-efficiency standards (aka CAFE). Blue Climate also speculates on the possibility.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. as our planet dies, US congresscritters play
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. As I understand it...
The argument from the MI Congressional delegation is that we should move beyond CAFE and invest in alterative fuels, but they never seem to answer the obvious response: why not do both? Do both in exchange for help for the auto industry during the transition so we stop the bleeding in SE Michigan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC