Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scorched-Earth Subpoena Strategy: "obsessive to the point of criminal in expanding Executive power"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 10:48 AM
Original message
Scorched-Earth Subpoena Strategy: "obsessive to the point of criminal in expanding Executive power"
WP, "Bench Conference," by Andrew Cohen
The Scorched-Earth Subpoena Strategy

The decision by White House officials to take an extreme position on executive privilege -- we won't even offer to Congress the log of privileged communications, never mind the actual substance of those communications -- is simply and clearly designed to delay a court fight on the merits of the dispute. It could take months to resolve the matter of the log before the fight is ripe for a substantive ruling. Thus we have the spectacle of veteran White House lawyers acting like first-year litigation associates told by their senior partners and clients to scorch the earth in order to delay a case.

It's not hard to understand why the White House doesn't want to turn over the contents of the emails or allow its personnel, current or former, to testify. The Bush administration has been obsessive to the point of criminal in protecting and expanding the power and authority of the executive branch, and this fight happens to give it yet another reason to push for more. But surely the bright lawyers in the White House understand that their privilege claim here isn't bulletproof -- which is why they have come up with a bush-league (no pun intended) maneuver like refusing to turn over a privilege log. The move mocks Congress, the legal system and the integrity of the White House counsel's office.

It is routine practice in litigation involving claims of privilege -- attorney/client, doctor/patient, whatever -- for the party asserting the privilege to turn over a "log" that includes the names of the people, the date of the communication, the "Bates" stamped numbers on the documents in question, etc.

Yet White House counsel Fred F. Fielding says that Congress' request for a privilege log is "unreasonable" because the legislators asked for too much information. But there can't be a fair fight about a privilege if only one side knows what is being fought about. The first thing a judge will do in this case is order the White House to share with Congress some sort of viable log. And the White House probably figures that by the time that happens, a month or two or more from now, we'll all be that much closer to the end of the Bush administration. Tick tock. The clock is ticking....

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/benchconference/2007/07/the_scorchedearth_subpoena_str.html#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. That certainly seems to be what's happening.
Some "contempt of congress" prison time might loosen up some of the legal poker game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC