Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo's Murray: "YAAWWN. That's my view of the Libby flap. What did people expect Bush to do?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 10:49 AM
Original message
WaPo's Murray: "YAAWWN. That's my view of the Libby flap. What did people expect Bush to do?"
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 10:56 AM by BurtWorm
Glenn Greenwald on "Our broken political discourse":


http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/07/10/libby/index.html

Washington Post National Political Reporter Shailagh Murray opined on Monday:

Washington: What can possibly be gained by congressional hearings into the Libby commutation? Clearly Bush had the authority to do this, and he did it. Q.E.D. I'm old enough to remember when President Ford appeared before a congressional committee to explain his pardon of Richard Nixon. But Bush is no Ford, and unlike the Ford pardon, I don't think this action is going to look better over time.

Shailagh Murray: YAAWWN. That's my view of the Libby flap. What on earth did people expect Bush to do?


YAAWWN. What could possibly be more boring or irrelevant than the President of the United States protecting one of his most powerful aides, now a convicted felon, from going to prison, thereby ensuring that that aide has no incentive to disclose what he knows? Can we get back to what really matters to Americans, like John Edwards' haircut and probing investigations of his stylist?

From the latest USA Today/Gallup Poll:

5. From what you have heard or read, do you think President Bush was right to commute Libby's sentence, do you think he should have gone further and granted him a full pardon, or do you think he should not have intervened at all on Libby's behalf?

    Right to commute sentence - 13%

    Should have granted full pardon - 6%

    Should not have intervened at all - 66%

    No opinion - 15%


As usual, the true "fringe" in our country are Bush followers and their establishment media allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. My expectation was that he should have upheld the law
And abide by the decision of the court.
But then the other side of my brain kicked me in the head and said this is the bu$h regime we are talking about and the law doesn't mean anything to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nor to the Beltway media.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. mr. murray's opinion.....YAAWWN....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Washington Post = YAAWWWN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Now that's quite a jaded opinion
this opinion-giver has clearly lost sight of right and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. If that was the writer's true opinion, there would be no article about it
It's impossible to justify Libby's obvious guilt or Bush's commutation of his deserved sentence, so the object is to instruct the masses, "Nothing to see here. Move along." :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. I expected everyone in government to uphold the law and protect the Constitution
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 11:14 AM by rocknation
no matter who gets hurt--even themselves.

But on the other hand, could we really expect Bush to risk Libby deciding to tell the truth if he went to jail?

:eyes:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC