Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Bush’s Iraq Obsession: America Held Hostage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:17 PM
Original message
George Bush’s Iraq Obsession: America Held Hostage
July 10, 2007

George Bush’s Iraq Obsession: America Held Hostage

As you read these words George W. Bush is poised to humiliate Senate Republicans yet again — and Senate Republicans, with only a few exceptions, are poised to accept this new humiliation and say, yet again: Yes, boss.

From the minute George Bush planned to let Osama bin Laden escape from Tora Bora by diverting our military to his obsessive hunger for the Iraq war, the conduct of Republicans in the Senate has been one of the most morally shameful abdications of conscience and duty in the history of the American Congress.

On Iraq, George Bush is trapped in his own private Guantanamo, a detainee of his personal and uncontrollable obsession about this war, no matter what the truth, no matter what the cost, no matter what the consequences.

At every single step of the way towards this catastrophe, the Senate Republicans marched in lockstep, at first blinded by their power in controlling the Senate, and then blinded by their fear of standing up to the man most of them know is deadly wrong, about this deadly war.

On Iraq, George Bush’s vision is that America should be held hostage to whatever darkness governs his spirit on this war that should never have been fought.

Democrats never mattered in the war world of George W. Bush. He is the only American president in our history who used war itself as a partisan political weapon rather than an effort behind which our country could rally.

In George Bush’s world of war, he was never the president of the United States, he was the decider, the commander guy, the child who said bring ‘em on.

George Bush was the little man in search of total power, treating war not as a higher purpose to win with unity, but as a lower political art form to demean Americans he treats as enemies.

No American President, not even Nixon at his worst, has ever demeaned, defamed and dishonored the office once held by George Washington in this manner.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great piece!
And, don't forget to vote in the poll asking how many seats Republicans will lose (or gain, ha ha) in the next election.

Currently 76% say they'll lose 4 or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great article. Brent Budowsky really puts it in the true light here.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great article with a small quibble:
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 03:56 PM by Phredicles
"He is the only American president in our history who used war itself as a partisan political weapon rather than an effort behind which our country could rally."

What about the Mexican War (1846-48)? Its purpose wasn't strictly partisan in the modern sense, but wasn't the basic idea to acquire more territory that would become slave states?

I once read a comparison between James K Polk and Caesar Disgustus (in the LA Times): http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/20084.html (for what it's worth)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting, there's another use of the "hostage" idea out there today.
mcjoan on dKos refers to "the hostage crisis our troops are in in Iraq."

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/7/10/153539/027
(The topic is Joe Lieberman's latest attack on Harry Reid.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC