NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-10-07 08:04 PM
Original message |
Mentioned on Countdown: How did ABC happen to miss that Republican Senator in the madams book? |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 08:07 PM by NNN0LHI
Didn't ABC give the all clear on that book that was in their possession? They said there was nothing else to report? Or did I get that wrong?
Don
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-10-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. maybe they were not looking for Repugs? |
rusty charly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-10-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message |
2. repukes cheating on their wives with |
|
hookers isn't news to ABC. that's "dog bites man"!
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-10-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Here's my completely UNINFORMED speculation--they found an ABC exec or ten on the list |
|
And did the "Move along...nothing to see here!!!" routine.
Brian Ross has got some 'splainin' to do, hasn't he? He should be ashamed of himself, I'm thinking...and applying for a job at Faux News, seeing as his journalistic credentials are about at their standards, apparently....!
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-10-07 08:13 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Miss? I don't think they missed it at all. |
|
Ignored it, obfuscated, whatever you call it, ABC was too chickenshit to run with it.
|
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-10-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It is my observation, that often MSM do as little reporting |
|
possible if a Republican is involved in Sex Scandal.
ABC did state and Fox News repeated ABC Report. No one in Congress or Wh involved.
|
rec_report
(783 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-10-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Keith and Dana Milbank told folks to get the docs from our site! |
|
'legitgov.org' I was happy w. that! :) --Lori
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |