Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think I'm going to throw up... "Rumor Mill: Rupert Murdoch Poised to Purchase Wall Street Journal"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 10:22 PM
Original message
I think I'm going to throw up... "Rumor Mill: Rupert Murdoch Poised to Purchase Wall Street Journal"

Josh Silver| BIO
RSS

Rumor Mill: Rupert Murdoch Poised to Purchase Wall Street Journal

Posted July 10, 2007 | 02:03 PM (EST)

Rupert Murdoch's move to acquire the Wall Street Journal is sending shock waves across the media industry, as well-documented reports fill the pages of our most credible newspapers and magazines detailing the media tycoon's consistent practice of using his media properties to advance his political ideology and business agenda: from Fox News to the New York Post to The Times of London. The latest rumors are that a deal is imminent, as a UK business news site recently reported an unconfirmed agreement.


But the debate over News Corp.'s $5 billion acquisition of the Wall Street Journal and its parent company Dow Jones goes far beyond Rupert Murdoch's quest for power. To a broken media system brought by rampant consolidation and the commoditization of news, this potential acquisition is another major blow to hard-hitting journalism. It means one less national outlet watchdogging our government and big business -- and one more chasing after "infotainment" stories about Paris Hilton and Anna Nicole Smith.

During the first three months of 2007, according the Project for Excellence in Journalism, Murdoch-owned Fox News' coverage of Anna Nicole Smith's death "trailed just barely the airtime spent on the Iraq policy debate. Fox also stood out for its lack of coverage on the firings of the U.S. attorneys, compared with the other (cable news) channels."

Murdoch's defenders emphatically argue that he is hands-off with his editorial staff, but history shows that he backs away only after he has replaced senior editorial staff with those in line with his personal ideology. In 1976, Murdoch bought the liberal New York Post and pledged to "maintain its present policies and traditions." It is now a right-wing tabloid with nary a pre-1976 policy or tradition intact.<snip>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-silver/rumor-mill-rupert-murdoc_b_55618.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC