Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Taylor up now on C-SPAN3

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:06 AM
Original message
Sarah Taylor up now on C-SPAN3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks...watching now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Leahy " What is the WH hiding?"
Love it, love Leahy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks watching
Anyone have the Senate link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hope we see some fireworks. It would be nice to
see some truth for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, but if Taylor doesn't testify, then I doubt it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. i'm on it--for awhile.
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 09:12 AM by orleans
what is it that the wh is so intent on hiding they cannot even identify the documents
edit: apparent this wh is contemptuous of congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. thanks and
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. Please summarize for us cuberats
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good opening speech, Senator Leahy!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. cnn has reported a few minutes ago ...
that Taylor will not testify -- That she will refuse.

glc

ps - what is the White House hiding?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. Leahy. the WH is contemptous of Congress. I hope Ms. Taylor will answer questions
and not be contemptuous of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. And no, I presume,
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 09:16 AM by Drum
Spector will start dribbling water on the campfire. Mr. Short-circuit. :( He seems pretty averse to open sessions and testimony under oath. What a chickenshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. We don't need an oath, we can have a closed session as long as there's a transcript, says
Specter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. Specter up
and doing comedy act. He would like Taylor to not have to testify under oath.
Oh, and it would be nice if this could be behind closed doors.

glc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. arlen's yapping now. talked to other senators about taking up
wh offer--"we can do without the oath"

(FUCK YOU ARLEN!)

"do with a closed session, tho i would prefer to see it open" but he wants a transcript

but he would be prepared to take this without a transcript

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #15
40. oh geez, Spector is still kissing these thugs asses, and telling
the committee that she does not have to take the oath?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. Specter talking now. Wants them to take up WH offer to meet informally..without oath
(although Specter wants them under oath) and without a transcript, but he would like a transcript. He would be willing to not have a transcript. He is such a fucking whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. I think you may have misunderstood him
I believe he said he didn't care about it being under oath because there are laws against an official lieing to Congress anyway. I can agree with that myself to be honest with you. An oath isn't necessary to lock up someone who lies to Congress. He did say that a transcript was absolutly necessary though. I agree with that too. He did say he would agree to closed door meetings - and that is unaccceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. This is like trying to figure out Greenspan speak.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. No, I did not misunderstand. He did then bumble that he would even want a meeting without
a transcript although he preferred one. Closed doors is totally unacceptable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
17. arlen believes continued tenure of attorney general (gonzo) is
not in the national interest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonbreathp9d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. I thought she was going to testify anyway?
was her family threatened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. Specter....
Now talking about the many abuses by Gonzo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
21. arlen: "if it goes to court it will take two years" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
32. So are we ordering a big mac or trying to pursue justice, arlen? n/t
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 09:23 AM by Skip Intro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
45. yea, so what, take it court.
they are criminals you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. Arlen Spector is an enemy of the United States (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. Spector says criminial contempt is not warranted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
25. Will she talke, will she squawk, or will she just sit down and lay an egg?
What will she do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. She'll probably do nothing more than perhaps a statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
27. Spector sounds like Taylor's defense attorney...
I so do not trust this putz...he has sold out time and time again, no matter what the offense that aggrieves him during press conferences. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
28. arlen counts 7 democrats, and said he could use some company! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. If he changed parties, he'd meet lots of nice people!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
29. Specter is the only Republican There?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. If no Republicans are there and they vote today for Contempt of Congress Citation
Against her then we win for today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:24 AM
Original message
I Can Not Wait To Hear Russ Fiengold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
30. Typical, the repukes don't show up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
33. leahy explains why we're not taking the wh offer
no follow up is unacceptable


schumer is talking now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
34. Leahy, the so-called offer from the WH, every time no transcripts, closed doors, no follow-up etc,
totally unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
37. Shumer up. IT IS A GAG ORDER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
38. "prez has issued a gag order, he can dress it up all he wants..."
but it is a gag order

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
39. schumer...
This is a gag order.

"at all costs to avoid telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth"

"I hope the president wakes up."

You go Schumer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. yeah, about bushie waking up...
HAHAHAHA! that ain't happening. unless, of course, someone gives him one of his shots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. LOL! n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
42. Grassley: Congress needs to be able to preform oversight.
Sara Taylor is from Iowa. Grassley met her when she was 6 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
43. grassley arrives and is up
Here to let you know that Sara Taylor is a wonderful person.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #43
58. oh what BS, she committed a crime didn't she?
what is this "she's a wonderful person" shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
44. Grassley on now...
providing a sweet sepia-toned flashback of Iowan Taylor. I can almost hear the background music....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #44
67. Document w series of emails (Sara + Kyle Sampson) Her RNC address she used
it a fair amount-regularly.

Why did you use it for US Attorney firings?

she didn't want to violate the Hatch Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
47. So Sen. Grassley has known Taylor since she was 6 yrs old...Mole in the WH
who could give Senate strategy to Bush...and vice versa. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #47
60. One of many, no doubt...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
48. Senator Ghastly is Bush's Boy!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
49. OMG, she doesn't sound like a mouse
However, she admires Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
50. OOPs another but kissing "DRONE"
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 09:32 AM by A wise Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
51. president has directed her not to testify
about white house and dismissal of us attorneys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
52. i intend to follow the prez instruction -- ARGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. i will answer questions if a court directs me to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
53. Her tone and words are essentially "Fuck You"
Cite her ass right now.

Throw her in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #53
61. Another Shub loving enabler. This rPesident above country. Jail would be a good
place for her to rethink her priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #53
78. She's hardboiled for sure
And she's also up against well seasoned Dem attorneys. Leahy's lacing into her pretty well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #53
118. "thanks for understanding"....
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 10:02 AM by shanti
:eyes: smarmy little *%$*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
54. Hmmm...this is sounding like there'll be no truthful testimony after all....
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
55. She refuses to talk and invites the Committe to take it to a judge
Said she'll talk if a judge tells her to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #55
66. I think she needs to spend some time in jail for contempt of Congress.
Is you or I refused to testify before a grand jury, we'd be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #55
68. then take the case to the judge.
and did she really say the President has instructed her not to talk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #68
95. yes
via a letter from the president's lawyer, Fielding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
56. Guess they'll be talking about American Idol???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
59. Taylor says take it to the Courts to Decide whether I can testify under subpoena...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #59
63. She's 32 years old....wielding lots of power.....lots of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #63
71. And... she has worked for the *resident for 8 years!
Imagine. What could her resume have looked like at age 24 that made her qualified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #59
119. she'll be a grandma before it gets settled
smug little beeotch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
62. Starts out with a lie -- nice move
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
64. ...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
65. I think we should just
go to the "WH" and arrest everyone that moves inside that building. I'm so sick of these lying fucking kool-aid drinking aliens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #65
69. I would like to K&R your reply
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #69
85. She doesn't have executive priviledge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #65
79. that would really shake them up wouldn't it??? they wouldn't expect it
if we paided them a visit at the WH, cause they keep on spoon feeding us FEAR everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
70. So she cares about the Hatch Act, but not the Presidential Records Act
Do I have that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:39 AM
Original message
Yep, and I think Leahy may be headed somewhere with this tact...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
112. I think so too Texas E. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
72. She admits a violation of the law is a violation of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
73. Go Senator Leahy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
74. Someone hand her a shovel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. a bed pan may be in order
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
76. Leahy has her stuttering already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
77. Go Senator!
I can almost hear Taylor sweating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
80. LEAHY!!!!
Go go go Sen. Leahy!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
81. did she fuck up or what
coming here, bush* you guys are so busted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #81
86. SO BUSTED!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #81
87. Her make-up is approaching her neck at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #81
109. What? What'd she say?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #109
115. You would just have to see it as well to get the full effect
her is out of her league
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
82. Have you reviewed the emails? Her attorney reviewed the emails.
If she had an email the attorney determined if they would go to the WH for determination.

Her attorney went through them & sent to the WH NOT to the Senate Judiciary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
83. Did you speak to the pResident about replacing US Attorneys.
Mr Fieldings says don't answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
84. This galls me beyond anger
The white house is an ongoing criminal enterprise that needs serious jail time if not more drastic measures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
88. Leahy trying to ask her general questions, with no content to reveal
And ST refuses to answer the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
89. I have a letter. . . I have a letter. . .. . I have a letter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
90. My My Sara.. The air is BRACING here outside the bubble, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
91. Specter up. He thinks declining to answer was correct based on WH counsel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #91
98. At least he said he doesn't think the WH counsel is right
and it has to be determined by the courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
92. Stonewall is up, and now it's Spector's turn to admire it.
He's defending her again!!!

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
93. Kyle Sampson, Sarah Taylor and who was the other girl who
testified (her name escapes me right now) they are all foot soldiers for Bush's loyalty party, and take the hits for this filthy administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #93
104. Monica Goodling
Goodling the Gosling

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #104
114. yea thanks her, another soldier who said nothing too.
these people are way over their heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #93
117. A "girl"? - was there a child who testified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
94. F*ck the courts! If she was called to testify in an Impeachment proceeding she'd have to answer! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #94
105. That can't possibly be true
The Dems have said repeatedly that the want to get at the truth. Surely, they wouldn't avoid such a powerful tool if it could help their investigations...


Oh yeah: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
96. Question raised about Bud Cummins then later replacedby Tim Griffin.
She knew Griffin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
97. CITE HER FOR CONTEMPT ........
.... and haul her cocky ass off to the hoosegow.

Her attitude is in your face and 'Fuck you, Congress".

Sentence her to a Kool Aide Withdrawal Diet while she serves her time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #97
102. I want to watch her squirm a lot longer
I want every Dem up there to grill her and let her parrot herself over and over. I want her to break into a sweat. She's already starting to glow. it shouldn't take too long!

Watch your pressure, Stinky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
99. Now Specter is rehabilitating Griffin
sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
100. Griffin was a JAG officer & prosecutor. About Cummins, she heard he planned to leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
101. IF THOSE EMAILS ON THE RNC SERVER WERE SENT DURING
OFFICE HOURS --THAT'S ILLEGAL (from what i understand) because they were being sent while we were paying these assholes!

why doesn't anyone bring that up??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #101
107. She said she may have used the wrong computer at times
Covering her ass on that one. But it surely opens it to illegal use during office hours!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #107
120. i don't understand why anyone doesn't bring this fact up! all these
pukes were dicking around with their personal politiking on THE GOVERNMENT'S TIME! ON MY DIME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
103. What a waste of time I guess it will have to be decided in the courts if Executive Privilege
applies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
106. Cummins forced out? Brings up Prez Exec Priviledge. Cummins was leaving.
He had 4 children and were heading to college. We identified an EXCEPTIONALLY qualified candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
108. but she IS talking about the US Attorneys matter...
I hope that she lets something slip that can compromise her "I've got a letter" defense and wedge into some real cross-examination....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
110. How do account for McNultys conclusion about removal? She doesn't know all the
conversations but she thinks poor communication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
111. Thread #2 now up on GD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
113. She should be led out in chains
to prison until she decides to tell the truth. These sons of bitches like building prisons, let's build a special prison for all of them to make up their minds to testify or spend the rest of their unnatural lives there wishing they had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
116. She thinks she's GONZO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC