Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Taylor / C-Span3 - thread #3

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:16 AM
Original message
Sarah Taylor / C-Span3 - thread #3
http://c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan3_rm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS3

Thread #2 can be found here.

The original thread can be found here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you unhappycamper!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
67. Cardin up

let me tell you my concern

one day 8 us attorneys were fired

perhaps doing things unpopular to the white house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Haha! Durbin!
"Karl Rove should be sitting at this table instead of you..."

!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Durbin called Rove A WUSS....
Pretty much told him to stop hiding behind Sara's skirts....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. "something called the judicial selection committee"
"did you ever sit in?"

"don't think I can answer that question..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. The more she exerts this bogus privilege, the worse the crooks in the WH look...
...I just want to know what happens next...this bullshit claim HAS to be challenged...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. VOTE CAGING. . . She only became familiar with the term through press
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. But are you familiar with the tactic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. thank you for keeping us informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. c-c-c-c-c-caging!
party over here party over there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oh now she is getting huffy about people being suspected of
vote caging....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Original message
because he's such anice guy,,, I guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. LMAO...long before any of us were on this earth
WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Original message
I.e., "Democrats did it, TOO! So there!"
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. who is saying that, ST
I wonder if she attended the same college as Monica Goodling, the Pat Robertson University!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. She attended the school of Rove....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. I think Sarah has a thing for Tim Griffin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. Um. Ms. Taylor, are you involved with Mr Griffin?
someone should ask that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
100. here are my thoughts on it
http://www.atlargely.com/2007/07/sara-taylor-obs.html

what oath did she take and who is her employer? and no one is following up with that question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
14. She really doesn't know when the letter allows her to talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. Whitehouse up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. HarrrrUMPH!
How DARE you even SUGGEST such a thing!?


...

:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. She had to talk with her lawyer about something she doesn't recall?
What a fucking piece of shit this woman is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. Question: Is having a creepy-sounding, godawful voice a pre-requisite to being in this Admin.??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Yes...it indicates the proper disconnect from ethics and morals...
:(

There is no heart behind it...and certainly no damned loyalty to the nation. So, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
20. Is there anything in your employment agreement that requires
you to respect Executive Priv. after you leave the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. they will "research it" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
38. note: They will "Attempt" to research it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. She took an oath to the President?


regular student of battology - "I don't recall"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID. . . . yup yup yup.. they didn't catch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. an oath to the president

This is most of the problem right there. Her oath was to this country!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
22. Whitehouse is up
Does your employment agreement state on your termination
state you must have executive privilege?

I don't recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. This guy is good....very, very cagey and persistent...
...I am impressed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #26
40. Matlock and Perry Mason rolled into one...he's good.
He always walks them into his trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. Did Griffen's past in oppo research give you pause in his desire
to be a US Atty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. Taylor: No. It qualifies him even more
since he ran a large research operation!


You can see how she got her job, spinmeister that she is.

Q: Would it give you pause that a convicted murderer was appointed by you as a child care specialist.
A: No, a convicted murderer is even more qualified, since he will understand the bars on the crib even more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
30. At his pleasure
Are they all prostitutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Prostitutes are honest. She's just a whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. obviously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #30
58. Sounds like they are talking about a king.
Pleasure? Sounds so arbitrary. Nothing should be at the pleasure of anybody. What is required is objective justification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. So she swore an oath "to the president" and serves at "his pleasure".
LOL

This is giving me a headache...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #31
42. Yeah, I caught that one too
Do they really swear an oath "to the president," or do they swear an oath to the people of the United States.

If people in the executive branch are swearing an oath to the president himself, that's an extremely disturbing thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
32. I think Larry Flynt might tell us more about "serving at the pleasure of the President." Heehee.
I'm so sick of that lame-o excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Original message
Oh yes! Can't wait to hear what he has to say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
35. and to go back to my question
hello.... midterm! uh, uh ... more 'artful'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
36. heh heh...Bush was just "clumsy" in the firings.... not "artfull"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #36
48. yes of course
had it been more artful they wouldn't have been caught.

I wonder what the White House is trying to hide.

Nice job on the part of Sen. Whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
37. .."blah, blah, blah Clinton did it"..."Yes, but to get back to my question.."
...nice smackdown of the bushbot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
39. Other presidents may have done it more "artfully."
You'll hear that quote today and tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. Other presidents WOULDN'T have done it at all
Thanks for the talking point, Sara!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. Not only WOULDN'T but DIDN'T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
43. I would love Chuck to get up and read the OATH that she took..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. to protect GWB, apparently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
45. uh uhhh uhhh ahh ummm uhhh ahhh ummmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
47. "I don't recall what Presidents Bush (sr) and Clinton"...
..."did -- perhaps they did the same thing but more artfully"

This was her response to the question, "As a long time observer of the political scene, would you say it is customary for a president to fire 10% of US Attorneys in midterm"

:wow:

That one made me gasp. Such a blatant lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
50. She may have given a "broad political overview" to the EPA.
She doesn't remember.

She "oftentimes talked about political races."

In other words, she & Rove tag teamed the govt. offices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
51. Whitehouse is going for the hatch act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. She doesn't follow what is being asked.
Apparently she doesn't recall her grasp of the English language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #55
70. I saw a Hatch Act violation and he lead her right into that corridor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
52. WH is talking her right into an admission of violating Hatch...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #52
61. She's cornered...
Bravo Senator...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
53. Damn, if she loves a dumbass like Bush
what would she do with someone with intelligence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
54. Shallow, irrelevant observation
That sound she makes in her throat -- where others would say "uh" or "um" -- is SO annoying to me it's downright distracting!!

Had to say that. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. uh uhhh uhhh ahh ummm uhhh ahhh ummmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #57
66. It's the croaking sound that gets me
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #66
69. I know what you mean, but I'm not sure how to spell that sound.
:) lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #69
89. "ehhhrrrr"?
"uuuhhhhhrrrr?" "ehehehehehe"? :shrug: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #89
93. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
56. I think Miss Snot is startng to sweat Under Whitehouse's questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
59. She is on very very shakey ground now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #59
65. quicksand time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonbreathp9d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
60. Isnt it funny how we all hoped for more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
62. LOL "I'm uh not uh sure ah what um you're uhh asking."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #62
71. "Ya know"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
63. It will only take one person from one of those breifings to quote her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
64. Trapped like a rat!
He nailed her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #64
72. Wish he had more time. They do get a second round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #72
122. I hope so he's nailing her on the GOPers violation of the Hatch Act.
I think the Rove gang are all guilty as hell. I think she's made a couple of bad boo-boos. They might also nail her on the unlawful use of the RNC email accounts, instead of the mandatory use of the regular White House email accounts for official government communications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
68. Was she remarkably ruder to Senator Whitehouse than to the other questioners
Or is it just me.

"Do you have a question?"

Who in hell does she think she is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #68
79. She's someone who mistakenly believes she's under some actual protection
from the WH. I so hope to see that illusion evaporate, and for her to gain a breathtaking degree of notoriety, as the Faust-ian bargain falls apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
73. She's getting extyremely uncomfortable and petulant
It's coming apart on the Hatch Act issues.

She's really pissy now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
74. I do not recall if there is a brain in my skull!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
75. She doesn't remember anyone complaining about a US Atty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
76. many cracks appearing in her demeanor... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
77. you don't recall if someone called you to
complain about a us attorney?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
78. She's not looking too good...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
80. She is being flippant. Cardin is gettin pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
81. "I assume what you had for breakfast last week was not the center of national attention."
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. Nailed her!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
83. any experts on body language here?
She seems a bit.... uncomfortable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #83
88. I'm no expert but she looks like the lies are getting too confusing to keep straight.
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM by Beelzebud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #88
96. Looks that way to me too....
...plus she's now getting uppity...NOT a good idea with these guys...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #83
92. On the question on wrong doing she was blinking and looking at
the table, while saying there was no wrong doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #92
119. Right. I thought the crossed arms thing was a contemptuous pose but then she got
nervous and defensive when she was called on her "no wrong doing" statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
84. I don't recall
dayam... my memory at my age is slipping, but give me a freaking break here! This is getting old FAST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Original message
Cardin is my Senator
Go Ben!

He is doing well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
85. I don't believe that anyone in the WH did anything wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
86. Such a remarkable vocabulary. I..uh...uh...huh...ah...I uh...
and incredible speaking style
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
87. Watch the "EYES", watch those batting "EYES"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
90. Crap! I have to go out for a bit. Hope I don't miss any bombshells!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #90
97. mispost...posted below...nt
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM by LeftNYC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
91. She sounds like William Macy in Fargo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #91
98. OMG you just nailed it! She's like a female version of that character.
I'm waiting for her to flee the interview. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #98
111. "I'm cooperating here!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #111
112. ROFLMAO!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #111
117. That scene came to my mind, too.
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 10:46 AM by Daphne08
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #91
99. LOL....so true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #91
103. "Let me tell ya bout the truecoat"...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #91
105. Perfect comparison.
And if they keep pushing now, I suspect she'll fold faster than he did. She's getting testy, and looking dumber by the minute. This should get the WH plenty worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #91
108. ROFL!!!
Perfect characterization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
94. Time to cuff her and drag her out
Snotty and argumentative behavior with a Senate committee should buy her some time behind bars to think things over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
95. She laughs when she gets more nervous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
101. She is not allowed to talk about FACTS. . only opinions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
102. She's coming unglued under the intensity of Cardin's questioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
104. Thread #4 up here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
106. She's using that letter to avoid answering questions based on whether they'd hurt BushCo.
VERY inconsistent in how she's using it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #106
116. Exactly....I just wish Leahy or SOMEONE would start to put some REAL pressure on her...
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
107. I shouldn't have answered that question.... How could I have an opinion
if I can't admit to having any facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
109. "The President, whom I admire, and worked for." WOW
First she says she "swore and oath to the president", now this!

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
110. 20 min recess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
113. None of these rat bastards
are ever going to come clean as they're all culpable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
114. Now she's going out to count the cars on the lot.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
115. Well fuckleface...you're the source of his frustration..you oughta appreciate it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
118. Haven't Constitutional scholars said that Ms. Taylor has no legal right to
claim executive privilege. Didn't John Dean say the other night that the Preznit would have had to get a court order squashing her testimony? Shouldn't she be found in contempt of Congress for this stonewalling. Didn't the Senators get advice about the legality of STaylor claiming privilege as a private citizen no longer working at the WH? WTF WTF WTF????? Are we supposed to accept Fielding's letter as the law in this case? Nixon's lawyer's letter is now held up as a higher legal standard than the Constitution and Congressional oversight? Where am I, is this still America???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #118
120. I don't think that they ahve accepted Fieldings letter...
But the courts have to decide that issue. So in the meantime, they are pressing her, but not going after her when she referes to the letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #120
121. But its my understanding that they can't accept Fielding's letter as being
legal excuse for her not testifying fully regardless. Bush would have to get a court order to keep her from testifying openly, letter or not. Why don't the Senators hit her with that information and knock the wind out of her 'Mr. Fielding's letter' arguement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC