unhappycamper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:16 AM
Original message |
Sarah Taylor / C-Span3 - thread #3 |
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Thank you unhappycamper! |
G_Leo_Criley
(553 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
let me tell you my concern
one day 8 us attorneys were fired
perhaps doing things unpopular to the white house
|
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
|
"Karl Rove should be sitting at this table instead of you..."
!!!
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Durbin called Rove A WUSS.... |
|
Pretty much told him to stop hiding behind Sara's skirts....
|
G_Leo_Criley
(553 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
4. "something called the judicial selection committee" |
|
"did you ever sit in?"
"don't think I can answer that question..."
|
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. The more she exerts this bogus privilege, the worse the crooks in the WH look... |
|
...I just want to know what happens next...this bullshit claim HAS to be challenged...
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
5. VOTE CAGING. . . She only became familiar with the term through press |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. But are you familiar with the tactic? |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
6. thank you for keeping us informed. |
The Witch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message |
|
party over here party over there
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Oh now she is getting huffy about people being suspected of |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Original message |
because he's such anice guy,,, I guess |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
11. LMAO...long before any of us were on this earth |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Original message |
I.e., "Democrats did it, TOO! So there!" |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM by WinkyDink
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. who is saying that, ST |
|
I wonder if she attended the same college as Monica Goodling, the Pat Robertson University!!
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
28. She attended the school of Rove.... |
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
12. I think Sarah has a thing for Tim Griffin! |
lala_rawraw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Um. Ms. Taylor, are you involved with Mr Griffin? |
|
someone should ask that...
|
lala_rawraw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
100. here are my thoughts on it |
|
http://www.atlargely.com/2007/07/sara-taylor-obs.htmlwhat oath did she take and who is her employer? and no one is following up with that question?
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
14. She really doesn't know when the letter allows her to talk. |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
The Witch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
|
How DARE you even SUGGEST such a thing!?
...
:nopity:
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
18. She had to talk with her lawyer about something she doesn't recall? |
|
What a fucking piece of shit this woman is...
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message |
19. Question: Is having a creepy-sounding, godawful voice a pre-requisite to being in this Admin.?? |
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
25. Yes...it indicates the proper disconnect from ethics and morals... |
|
:(
There is no heart behind it...and certainly no damned loyalty to the nation. So, yes.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message |
20. Is there anything in your employment agreement that requires |
|
you to respect Executive Priv. after you leave the WH?
|
G_Leo_Criley
(553 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
24. they will "research it" n/t |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
38. note: They will "Attempt" to research it. |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message |
21. She took an oath to the President? |
|
regular student of battology - "I don't recall"
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
27. THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID. . . . yup yup yup.. they didn't catch it. |
G_Leo_Criley
(553 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
29. an oath to the president |
|
This is most of the problem right there. Her oath was to this country!
|
IChing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Does your employment agreement state on your termination state you must have executive privilege?
I don't recall.
|
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
26. This guy is good....very, very cagey and persistent... |
IChing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
40. Matlock and Perry Mason rolled into one...he's good. |
|
He always walks them into his trap.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
23. Did Griffen's past in oppo research give you pause in his desire |
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
34. Taylor: No. It qualifies him even more |
|
since he ran a large research operation!
You can see how she got her job, spinmeister that she is.
Q: Would it give you pause that a convicted murderer was appointed by you as a child care specialist. A: No, a convicted murderer is even more qualified, since he will understand the bars on the crib even more!
|
A wise Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Are they all prostitutes?
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
33. Prostitutes are honest. She's just a whore. |
A wise Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
firefox_fan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
58. Sounds like they are talking about a king. |
|
Pleasure? Sounds so arbitrary. Nothing should be at the pleasure of anybody. What is required is objective justification.
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |
31. So she swore an oath "to the president" and serves at "his pleasure". |
|
LOL
This is giving me a headache...
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
42. Yeah, I caught that one too |
|
Do they really swear an oath "to the president," or do they swear an oath to the people of the United States.
If people in the executive branch are swearing an oath to the president himself, that's an extremely disturbing thing.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
32. I think Larry Flynt might tell us more about "serving at the pleasure of the President." Heehee. |
|
I'm so sick of that lame-o excuse.
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Original message |
Oh yes! Can't wait to hear what he has to say! |
Terri S
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
35. and to go back to my question |
|
hello.... midterm! uh, uh ... more 'artful'?
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
36. heh heh...Bush was just "clumsy" in the firings.... not "artfull" |
G_Leo_Criley
(553 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
had it been more artful they wouldn't have been caught.
I wonder what the White House is trying to hide.
Nice job on the part of Sen. Whitehouse.
|
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
37. .."blah, blah, blah Clinton did it"..."Yes, but to get back to my question.." |
|
...nice smackdown of the bushbot...
|
The Witch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message |
39. Other presidents may have done it more "artfully." |
|
You'll hear that quote today and tomorrow.
|
johnfunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
44. Other presidents WOULDN'T have done it at all |
|
Thanks for the talking point, Sara!
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #44 |
49. Not only WOULDN'T but DIDN'T |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message |
43. I would love Chuck to get up and read the OATH that she took.. |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
46. to protect GWB, apparently |
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message |
45. uh uhhh uhhh ahh ummm uhhh ahhh ummmm |
ljm2002
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message |
47. "I don't recall what Presidents Bush (sr) and Clinton"... |
|
..."did -- perhaps they did the same thing but more artfully"
This was her response to the question, "As a long time observer of the political scene, would you say it is customary for a president to fire 10% of US Attorneys in midterm"
:wow:
That one made me gasp. Such a blatant lie.
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
50. She may have given a "broad political overview" to the EPA. |
|
She doesn't remember.
She "oftentimes talked about political races."
In other words, she & Rove tag teamed the govt. offices.
|
IChing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
51. Whitehouse is going for the hatch act |
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #51 |
55. She doesn't follow what is being asked. |
|
Apparently she doesn't recall her grasp of the English language.
|
IChing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #55 |
70. I saw a Hatch Act violation and he lead her right into that corridor |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
52. WH is talking her right into an admission of violating Hatch... |
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #52 |
A wise Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
53. Damn, if she loves a dumbass like Bush |
|
what would she do with someone with intelligence?
|
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
54. Shallow, irrelevant observation |
|
That sound she makes in her throat -- where others would say "uh" or "um" -- is SO annoying to me it's downright distracting!!
Had to say that. :hide:
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
57. uh uhhh uhhh ahh ummm uhhh ahhh ummmm |
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #57 |
66. It's the croaking sound that gets me |
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
69. I know what you mean, but I'm not sure how to spell that sound. |
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
|
"uuuhhhhhrrrr?" "ehehehehehe"? :shrug: :rofl:
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #89 |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
56. I think Miss Snot is startng to sweat Under Whitehouse's questions |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
59. She is on very very shakey ground now |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
Dragonbreathp9d
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
60. Isnt it funny how we all hoped for more? |
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
62. LOL "I'm uh not uh sure ah what um you're uhh asking." |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #62 |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
63. It will only take one person from one of those breifings to quote her. |
Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #64 |
72. Wish he had more time. They do get a second round. |
Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #72 |
122. I hope so he's nailing her on the GOPers violation of the Hatch Act. |
|
I think the Rove gang are all guilty as hell. I think she's made a couple of bad boo-boos. They might also nail her on the unlawful use of the RNC email accounts, instead of the mandatory use of the regular White House email accounts for official government communications.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message |
68. Was she remarkably ruder to Senator Whitehouse than to the other questioners |
|
Or is it just me.
"Do you have a question?"
Who in hell does she think she is?
|
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #68 |
79. She's someone who mistakenly believes she's under some actual protection |
|
from the WH. I so hope to see that illusion evaporate, and for her to gain a breathtaking degree of notoriety, as the Faust-ian bargain falls apart.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
73. She's getting extyremely uncomfortable and petulant |
|
It's coming apart on the Hatch Act issues.
She's really pissy now.
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
74. I do not recall if there is a brain in my skull! |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
75. She doesn't remember anyone complaining about a US Atty |
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
76. many cracks appearing in her demeanor... n/t |
G_Leo_Criley
(553 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
77. you don't recall if someone called you to |
|
complain about a us attorney?
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
78. She's not looking too good... |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
80. She is being flippant. Cardin is gettin pissed. |
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
81. "I assume what you had for breakfast last week was not the center of national attention." |
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #81 |
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
83. any experts on body language here? |
|
She seems a bit.... uncomfortable.
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #83 |
88. I'm no expert but she looks like the lies are getting too confusing to keep straight. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM by Beelzebud
|
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #88 |
96. Looks that way to me too.... |
|
...plus she's now getting uppity...NOT a good idea with these guys...
|
IChing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #83 |
92. On the question on wrong doing she was blinking and looking at |
|
the table, while saying there was no wrong doing.
|
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #92 |
119. Right. I thought the crossed arms thing was a contemptuous pose but then she got |
|
nervous and defensive when she was called on her "no wrong doing" statement.
|
Terri S
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
dayam... my memory at my age is slipping, but give me a freaking break here! This is getting old FAST
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Original message |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
85. I don't believe that anyone in the WH did anything wrong |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
86. Such a remarkable vocabulary. I..uh...uh...huh...ah...I uh... |
|
and incredible speaking style
|
A wise Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
87. Watch the "EYES", watch those batting "EYES" |
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
90. Crap! I have to go out for a bit. Hope I don't miss any bombshells! |
LeftNYC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #90 |
97. mispost...posted below...nt |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM by LeftNYC
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
91. She sounds like William Macy in Fargo. |
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #91 |
98. OMG you just nailed it! She's like a female version of that character. |
|
I'm waiting for her to flee the interview. :D
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #98 |
111. "I'm cooperating here!" |
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #111 |
Daphne08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #111 |
117. That scene came to my mind, too. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 10:46 AM by Daphne08
:rofl:
|
IChing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #91 |
LeftNYC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #91 |
103. "Let me tell ya bout the truecoat"...nt |
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #91 |
|
And if they keep pushing now, I suspect she'll fold faster than he did. She's getting testy, and looking dumber by the minute. This should get the WH plenty worried.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #91 |
|
Perfect characterization.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
94. Time to cuff her and drag her out |
|
Snotty and argumentative behavior with a Senate committee should buy her some time behind bars to think things over.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
95. She laughs when she gets more nervous |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
101. She is not allowed to talk about FACTS. . only opinions? |
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
102. She's coming unglued under the intensity of Cardin's questioning. |
unhappycamper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
106. She's using that letter to avoid answering questions based on whether they'd hurt BushCo. |
|
VERY inconsistent in how she's using it.
|
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #106 |
116. Exactly....I just wish Leahy or SOMEONE would start to put some REAL pressure on her... |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
107. I shouldn't have answered that question.... How could I have an opinion |
|
if I can't admit to having any facts?
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
109. "The President, whom I admire, and worked for." WOW |
|
First she says she "swore and oath to the president", now this!
LOL
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
113. None of these rat bastards |
|
are ever going to come clean as they're all culpable.
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
114. Now she's going out to count the cars on the lot. |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
115. Well fuckleface...you're the source of his frustration..you oughta appreciate it |
bunny planet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
118. Haven't Constitutional scholars said that Ms. Taylor has no legal right to |
|
claim executive privilege. Didn't John Dean say the other night that the Preznit would have had to get a court order squashing her testimony? Shouldn't she be found in contempt of Congress for this stonewalling. Didn't the Senators get advice about the legality of STaylor claiming privilege as a private citizen no longer working at the WH? WTF WTF WTF????? Are we supposed to accept Fielding's letter as the law in this case? Nixon's lawyer's letter is now held up as a higher legal standard than the Constitution and Congressional oversight? Where am I, is this still America???
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #118 |
120. I don't think that they ahve accepted Fieldings letter... |
|
But the courts have to decide that issue. So in the meantime, they are pressing her, but not going after her when she referes to the letter.
|
bunny planet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #120 |
121. But its my understanding that they can't accept Fielding's letter as being |
|
legal excuse for her not testifying fully regardless. Bush would have to get a court order to keep her from testifying openly, letter or not. Why don't the Senators hit her with that information and knock the wind out of her 'Mr. Fielding's letter' arguement?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:49 AM
Response to Original message |