Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What, besides 'party loyalty', keeps Sara Taylor or Meirs from answering questions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:35 AM
Original message
What, besides 'party loyalty', keeps Sara Taylor or Meirs from answering questions?
How does the White House, their ex-employer, have any say in what they can relate? Sara was asked if she had an 'employee contract' that stated she would claim executive privilege after she left employment, and she said she didn't recall ever signing such an agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fear of reprisals?
Blind stupidity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. they daren't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. My sentiments exactly
look what they did to Plame to "get even". The ruined an undercover operation that was benefiting this country in finding WMD. And put the lives of many many operatives in danger, as well as Plame. So they give a damn about anything but covering theirs and rove (especially) asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Cheney will shoot you in the face.
Then disembowel your family.
Then eat your dog.
And then he really starts to get angry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackHawk706867 Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hope they have a way of taking this dipshit down... She is arrogant...
just like her former boss. I think she is stonewalling...

ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. She said she took a loyalty oath "to the President"... I am pretty
sure that the oath that she took was to the United States of America, not George W. Bush but that failure to understand who they are working for is what makes these people so dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Loyalty oath to the president --
I wouldn't put it past them. And not to the 'president' but to the specific person in that office.

Reminds me of German officers swearing loyalty to the Fueher, instead of to the Fatherland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think it's a mix of cult-like culture and promises of safety
These people are "indoctrinated" into the cult of the Repub party (these days)--they get 'em young and, let's face it, these folks aren't exactly the sharpest knives in the drawer, and so more susceptible to that kind of brainwashing--and believe in Repub Party Uber Alles. If they grow a spine and think of straying, I firmly believe they're threatened that harm will come to them or their families. But those who stay loyal yet find themselves under the gun are promised protection and salvation. See: Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Siege mentality ... us vs. them ... zero-sum thinking ... annointed self-righteousness.
It's a syndrome, not a binary ... authoritarianism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. The absolute certainty that there will be no consequences
The wussy senate dems talk real tough but don't follow through on their threats.

Taylor should be charged with contempt of congress and taken out of the hearing room in handcuffs.

Until Leahy and the rest of them grow a spine this will never happen and they'll continue to stall evade and falsely claim executive privilege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Fear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. According to Tayler, she took "an oath to the president".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. That jumped out at me, too.
I'd like to see that oath. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. I mean, legally, there's no way a letter from the WH attorney can dictate what someone, not
directly and currently connected to them, can say or do, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. Two things. Carrot and a stick
The stick: NSA spying. You really don't believe that Cheney/Bush doesn't have a huge file on each and every congresscritter/staff do you?

The carrot: K Street. High paying, high prestige job ready and waiting for any loyal Bushie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. Her loyalty is the Republican Party, not to the Constitution.
Fighting against the rule of law right now means her career is made. This is a smart career move, the law be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. the privielge issue
The courts will side with the COngress though because of compelling national interest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC