Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letter sent to Sen. Webb by the Military Officers Assn of America:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 11:46 AM
Original message
Letter sent to Sen. Webb by the Military Officers Assn of America:
http://webb.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=278538

Below is a copy of a letter sent to Senator Webb on Tuesday by the President of the Military Officers Association of America on behalf of its 368,000 members.


July 10, 2007



The Honorable James H. Webb, Jr.

United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510



Dear Senator Webb,

On behalf of the 368,000 members of the Military Officers Association of America (MOAA), I am writing to express MOAA’s support for your amendment that would support our military men and women by establishing standards for dwell time between consecutive operational deployments.

Even before September 11, 2001, our military leaders indicated that members and families of all services were stretched thin in meeting deployments requirements. The subsequent exponential growth of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, compounded be reluctance to grow our forces to meet requirements of an acknowledged “long war,” has placed extreme stress on active duty, Guard and Reserve forces alike.

MOAA is very concerned that steps must be taken to protect our most precious military asset – the all-volunteer force – from having to bear such a disproportionate share of national wartimes sacrifice. If we are not better stewards of our troops and their families in the future than we have been in the recent past, MOAA believes strongly that we will be putting the all-volunteer force at unacceptable risk.

Your amendment makes provision for exceptions in national emergencies, recognizing that national safety must come first. But it establishes an important principle that a primary requirement for sustaining long-term readiness is a national commitment to sustaining military forces at levels sufficient to provide a reasonable rotation base that avoids imposing unacceptable burdens of national sacrifice on too small a force.

MOAA applauds your efforts to focus national attention on this fundamental principle of fairness to the members and families of the military community who already have stretched themselves beyond any reasonable standard in protecting our Nation’s interests.

Sincerely,


Norbert R. Ryan, Jr. USN (Ret.)
President, MOAA

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you, MOAA.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Glad to be 5th rec - he's my Senator and he's soooo right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. How sharp is Jim Webb?
If the Congress won't impeach, Plan B should include Death of a Thousand Cuts. This will wound Bush severely. It's right on framing, tactics, and of course, substance. Can Republicans vote against it? Could Bush veto it? Only with severe damage, I think.

It will hamper the war effort and save American lives. :patriot:

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The answer to your first question is yes.
Republicans could and did vote against it, and were succesful in prohibiting the bill from coming before the Senate for an up or down vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yeah, I overestimated them. But kudos still go to Webb...
This can be used against them. No skin off Webb's nose.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just sent that letter to Martinez (R - Fl). And asked again why he voted "Ney"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you Military Officers Association of America and thanks to
The Honorable James H. Webb, Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC