Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Taylor / C-Span3 - thread #6

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:01 PM
Original message
Sarah Taylor / C-Span3 - thread #6
http://c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan3_rm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS3

Thread #5 can be found here.

Thread #4 can be found here.

Thread #3 can be found here.

Thread #2 can be found here.

The original thread can be found here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hold her in contempt, Leahy. Don't give this operative a pass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. K&R for this reply LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Okay, here we go with weak Democrats. Change your answers if you want to.
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 12:06 PM by WinkyDink
The written Q&A should have preceded this inquiry. THEN she'd have no chance to act unprepared about "recall".

Ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No kidding, They need to start nailing people or this will never stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They better not wimp out now... I'll be so fucking pissed off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Was that it? Is there any more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Thats it. She gets a get out of jail free card, and a chance to revise her statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Lucky ducky
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 12:13 PM by GreenPartyVoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Yeah, this "take-home exam" routine is becoming old. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. exactly!
This is getting tiresome. To let these people continually get away with this, and have a member of the Judiciary Committee blatently advising her on how to get out of a contempt ruling is obscene! Enough is enough. Are there any balls at all in Congress anymore? ... Let alone even passing knowledge Constitutional law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. You have a legal obligation to tell the truth and nothing but the truth - Leahy
and you have a 'limited' time to correct anything said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Is she sitting there lying and they're catching her at it?
I need my whole screen right now and so I can't watch it at the moment..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Too bad a petty thief wouldn't get this chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Leahy : If President wasn't involved then no Exec Priviledge. ST stated Prez
was NOT INVOLVED.

What was the WH so intent on hiding?

Was it Rove?

Was it corrupting law enforcement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Leahy rocks
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 12:09 PM by shadowknows69
this second chance is to test her loyalty. Change your answers or you're going to jail.


Well in theory anyway until King George commutes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. Taylor's body language, look, after Leahy said her testimony
weakens the bush cabal's claim to Executive Privilege was unmistakable. It was a very clear "Oh SHIT" reaction. I LOVED it and loved that Leahy spelled it out to her, that was priceless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. I caught that too...
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the Democrats wimp out AGAIN... Why fucking bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's it, that's fucking it
what did you have this hearing for if that's it?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. You weren't listening carefully
She was lying through her teeth. They've got her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. and then they gave her advice on how to get out of it.
Yeah, I was listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
48. The point is: what will they do with her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. That's it, that's fucking it
what did you have this hearing for if that's it?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. RECESS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Oh! What a pretty playground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's it, that's fucking it
what did you have this hearing for if that's it?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. Leahy: We aren't trying to getcha, we are trying to get them
ok, thats my interpretation anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clemencia1946 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Yep, she's going to jail if she doesn't change her answers
Leahy was being "nice". They know she is lying, so they have given her a chance to name names or go to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. except that you get them by getting HER! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. ...and don't make us have to getcha
while we're trying to get them. It will follow you for the rest of your life.

I'm sure in their arrogance, ST and her entourage had a good laugh at Spector's ending comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. I think they really want Rove.
but that should not make us back off, we should call those who are on this committee, we need to show these Senators we are awake!! I will call Senator Whitehouse when I get home tonite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sara Taylor is now toast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. Now on to the House Judiciary hearing
Its gonna be a long week for the bush admin. Snowjob is going to believe in global warming by the end of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. nah... he'll go down defending all the bs ... to the bitter end! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
30. Is it over or just a break? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. The look on her face at the end said it all,
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 12:14 PM by PRETZEL
I'm hoping that the last little whisper in her ear from attorney was that she seriously fucked up. Leahy caught it in saying that in her opening statement as well as statements made by others that the President wasn't involved just takes any claims of exec. priveledge right out the window. Spector realized that also. He basically told her that she's been thrown under the bus and if you want to avoid another bus running over you you have some serious thinking to do.

I think Spector realized that he can't stop any contempt of Congress citations now.

edited for grammer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Well, she can avoid a contempt charge
but only by going back and correcting her testimony. hehe. Between a rock and a hard place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. exactly......eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
34. This is GOOD. If Pres was involved = Exec. Priv., then she lied. It's TRAPS THEM.
Taylor stated that the President was NOT involved, which seriously damages his claim of executive priv. However, if she backtracks on this claim to provide executive priv. coverage, then she lied to Congress. So, for Taylor it's a matter of a perjury charge or giving up the Pres. claim.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
36. I just got here, what's happening? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Amnesia
Miss Taylor suffers from the same amnesia as the rest of the Republican party. Perhaps we could send them all to a home somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
38. If she is cited for contempt, can * just pardon her?
I wouldnt put anything past him at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. He can pardon anybody he wants, as I understand it---except for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. He can pardon her in advance like his daddy pardoned Caspar Weinberger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
41. here is the list of committee members
call anyone of them and leave a message.

http://judiciary.senate.gov/members.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
42. I don't see this on c-span 3 - is it over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Break I think?>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Thanks
just got here myself and thought I missed it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. It's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. oh pooh!
I did miss it all.

Thanks for the heads up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC