Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are the current Republicans in Congress the most obstructionist ever? It seems that they

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:04 PM
Original message
Are the current Republicans in Congress the most obstructionist ever? It seems that they
filibuster and block virtually anything Democrats try to do. Is there any precedent for this?

It makes me even more angry about the almost complete failure by Democrats to exercise any power of this type available to them when they were in the minority.

Will there be any attempt by the Democratic Party to call attention to this and make it a major topic in the 2008 elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure there will be an angry letter or two.
Our Congressional leaders are spineless amoebas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just retrieve and play all those outraged quotes by the REpigLICKERS about how
the filibuster had never had any place in politics till the DemoRATS brought it up, and how vicePRESIDENT Cheney might have to go NUKULAR on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. What is even more surprising is
that everyone in the world automatically assumes Bush is going to veto any and all bills. No one can just pass bills and send them to get signed into law. All bills have to be veto proof before they will even be considered.

The world is silent on the fact that a president who has only vetoed two bills is now considered to be a veto maniac.

Now what is up with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He will veto the bills
And has his spokespeople say as much before they hit his desk. Dems know exactly what his stance is on every bill they send him and they also know that he refuses to pass anything that isn't 100% what he wants because he is a 2 year old child on a temper tantrum.

He's only vetoed two bills because he never had to veto anything while the Republicans controlled the agenda in the majority and now we've only been able to get two of our bigger bills past those same Republicans that are filibustering everything that comes their way. Without 60 votes we're screwed and considering Lieberman is a RW hack and Tim Johnson is at home in bed, we don't have the votes to break that 60.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I am not saying whether he will or will not
I am saying Bush has vetoed two bills but the entire congress is running scared of passing any bills because of Bush's veto.

There is no discussion on this.

The public is unaware that a GOP president will only pass bills if and only if a GOPer presented it. If a Dem presents a bill, the bill will be vetoed.

That is a totalitarian presidency. We have turned into a totalitarian state with the people being kept completely in the dark of that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Isn't there something to be said for passing good bills anyway and MAKING him veto them?
And being able to honestly tell the American people "we tried but were obstructed by the Republicans, in Congress with filibuster, and in the White House with vetoes"?

What's so bad about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey, they just don't wanna go to jail.
And if you ever found out what they've been doing...well, golly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC