Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Refuses to Explain Clemency Order for Libby As House Panel Opens Probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:31 PM
Original message
Bush Refuses to Explain Clemency Order for Libby As House Panel Opens Probe
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2007/07/bush_refuses_to_explain_libby.php

Bush refuses to explain Libby order

Bush Refuses to Explain Clemency Order for Libby As House Panel Opens Probe

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS
AP News

Jul 11, 2007 18:29 EDT

President Bush refused to explain to Congress on Wednesday why he commuted the prison sentence of former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

The husband of the CIA agent outed in the case testified during a House hearing that the clemency grant had cast a pall of suspicion over the presidency.

In a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., Bush counsel Fred Fielding said Congress had no authority to review a presidential clemency decision.

"To allow such an inquiry would chill the complete and candid advice that President Bush, and future presidents, must be able to rely upon in discharging their constitutional responsibilities," he wrote.

The letter came in the middle of a politically charged hearing by the Judiciary panel on Bush's move last week to erase Libby's 2 1/2-year prison sentence. Libby, a former top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, was convicted of obstructing justice in a federal probe of the leak of former CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson's identity.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. No authority to review? I love it!!!
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 08:35 PM by Fredda Weinberg
I can't wait to see the poor creature who tries to make that argument in court. I've seen more laughter directed at political figures in the past week than previously in my lifetime ... and I remember Nixon's downfall.

The Rove machine is collapsing inward. Only Comedy Central can do this justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Funny how they use the law only when convenient.
They're outlaws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And Republicans hate trial lawyers---until they need them.
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 08:47 PM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Better than being in-laws
especially mine!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its all they fuckin got! How many f'in times
are they goin to pull this lame ass defense out of the stale dead putrid rotting thing that is their Administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Until it hits the Supreme Court and Roberts okays it.
Then we'll have REALLY difficult decisions to make.

But I want Bush prosecuted for breathing the second his ass hits the pavement on January 20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. priviledge does not trump accountability
except in dictatorships ...and we know how they usually end.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Compare the hearings REPUBLICANS held to lambaste Bill Clinton for his pardon
of Marc Rich. On March 1, 2001, there was the spectacle of Bob Barr asking WH attorney Beth Conlan about each of many phone call log entries in a thick book of exhibits. Clinton waived executive privilege completely so that Republicans had hundreds of leads they could pursue to nail Big Dawg.

But they failed utterly. Scooter Libby, who was Marc Rich's attorney until Cheney made him Chief of Staff, testified that in his opinion Rich was innocent of all the charges upon which he had been indicted! Beth Conlan tistified that a call from the Israeli Prime Minister and a green light from AAG Eric Holder were the keys to the last-minute pardon.

And Henry Waxman (D-CA) was a much more vigorous questioner of the witnesses than any Republican.

Compare those hearings to the circle-the-wagons coverup Republicans are carrying on in USAttorneygate and Treasongate.

See http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=1298536&mesg_id=1300032 for CSPAN links to videos of the Clinton pardon hearings, rebroadcast early this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. He had to commute the sentence because
Scooter would have had a heart attack the eve of his day to report to prison. Then he would have had to be cremated and spend eternity with Kenny boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC