Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*** Official House Judiciary Miers Didn't Show *** Thread 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM
Original message
*** Official House Judiciary Miers Didn't Show *** Thread 2
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:39 AM by MiniMe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. k & R and here is thread 1 for those who missed it:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What about the violation of the subpoena
does Cooper not understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:41 AM
Original message
Oh, he's just the water-boy! He understands everything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thanks Helderheid
I went back and edited for the original info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Conyers filed a motion to charge Miers with contempt last I read--am I correct? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. We live in a dictatorship ~ nothing that is right matters now nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I don't think so, he seconded a motion that it was not acceptable for her not to show
but it can be hard to follow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Ah--okay. I'd call that setting the stage for something though. thanks for the clarification. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Also available to viewed at the Committee's website
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Cannon wants the evidence....what a shit-head he wants the discussion
....that the White House offered, Meyers would meet with selected committee members behind closed doors, not under oath without transcript....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Cannon just made a point, but he was stopped by his attorneys
...he screwed up about something not clear what he is befuddled by his own comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Cannon sounds a little more reasonable after Sanchez's excellent speech
I was actually impressed with what he had to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. IMO he sounds scared. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. He's a bit more deferential now, is he not?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. Cannon interrupted in his diatribe by Conyers. Conyers wants to make this simple
point that they can't produce the evidence of misconduct if the witness doesn't show up. The take it or leave it offer they (WH)offered was unacceptable that no HS student would accept! There is no clear Constitutional prerogative of the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good GOD Cannon is DENSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. "What is it we're talking about here? Immunity? What?" What a MORAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. No, he's acting chisel for the hour
A colleague will be stepping in as the screwdriver shortly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. Can he beat this dead horse a little longer?
I think Ms Sanchez is getting a tad annoyed! haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. And as nervous as all heck! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. So now Cannon is "worried about the diminishment of our power"???
Gee, do ya think the courts are stacked or something Rep. Cannon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
137. he means diminishment of repukes' power, no doubt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
17. God I can feel the tension through the internets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Isn't that something? Me too--I think this is almost beeter than watching it;
waiting for the mext little tidbit.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. Absolutely!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
22. The motion has been made to reject Miers claim of immunity and executive priviledge
as a reason for her not to show. Cannon is being an ass about it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
24. YOU GO GIRL!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
27. Sanchez getting pissed at Cannon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. "Does that clarify it for you?"
umm duhhh ummm...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #36
138. bwahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
29. I think this is the tipping point. I know that has been said before, but I feel it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #29
133. It's definitely a line in the sand moment
This is definitely a riveting point in history if you are paying attention. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. "What we got here is an empty chair!"
Cohen is pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Original message
As he represents the anger of the citizens of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. Please let a photo of that empty chair be the front page of every rag tomorrow!
I can dream, can't I? (sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
31. Cannon is totally perplexed by the contempt motion
....and not asked for time to gather his thoughts....I think he'll need about a year or so to do that....:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
32. I HATE introductory soliloquey's, GET to the point to what you want to say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
33. Cohen! The Emperor cannot tell citizens to flaunt the law!!!! Go Cohen!!!!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
34. The President, or the EMPEROR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
35. I LOVE MR COHEN!
The Emperor has no clothes...haha

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM
Original message
"This is as contemptuous as you can be...and you don't just show up!"
Nixon Part Two!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
37. This guy Cohen is telling it like it is!!!
This is going to go somewhere folks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. He rocks!!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
59. Yep, they're committed now..
You don't call the President "The Emperor" and then fold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
38. MEANWHILE: Bush just said that Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah are ALL helping Al-Qaeda in Iraq.
And that we MUST stay there, or our frinds and allies will be upset with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
39. bwahahahah Emperor!!
Kick ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
41. Wow.............Cohen!
Great statement! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. Great speech, the emperor has no clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
42. LOL this is a gary trudeau cartoon without the feather! cohen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM
Original message
Steve Cohen D-TN refers to Bush as the emperor and the feather
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
44. GAry Trudeu live, all we ar missing is the feather what a hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
45. Did he just mention Harriet Woods??
:rofl:

That's Rosemary Woods and Harriet Miers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. Did he really? OMG--that's hysterical. Please tell me it's true! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM
Original message
I'm pretty sure that is what I heard
I was looking for anybody else that heard it too. I didn't make it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #47
51. He did...called it Nixon Part Two
(even though her name was Rosemary)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #51
62. Thanks--that is classic! I even remember the Woods "stretch..."
Eeek, showing my age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #51
128. ...and this is the Huston Plan, Part II for anyone who followed Watergate
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM by EVDebs
Right, Agent Mike ?

Huston Plan, reorganize intell and establish martial law in the US. Started by Thomas Huston immediately prior to Watergate but supposedly shot down by Hoover and Helms opposition...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #51
139. LOL! Harriet Woods, great line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
48. Oh Lord...now Keller
EP is equal to husband/wife privilege? WTF????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. They have to know their argument holds no water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #49
57. "Do you want to have a bunch of yes-men around the President"
Ummm, Mr. Keller might want to do a reality check on what's there at this very moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. Why is he reading his statements?
Can't keep it straight in his head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. Kkkarl and freddy just gave them to him. He hasn't seen them before.
My guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:53 AM
Original message
Political points?
*wink*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #48
55. Well, he has been effing the country but a lot of us don't recognize the marriage. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #48
63. This Ass-Hat is unbelievable
A-Number 1 Kool-Aid drinker or just so stupid he needs to have his ass kicked all over DC.

Or maybe just both.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
50. * is ALREADY surrounded by YES men THAT IS THE PROBLEM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
52. Mr. Keller is another moran. Ms. Sanchez just CITED PRECEDENT after PRECEDENT on EP!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
54. Keller: You are LEGALLY full of shit!
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:51 AM by Hepburn
Husband-wife, attorney-client privileges, etc., are set out specifically in the codes and statutes. Executive privilege is NOT. Go fuck yourself, Keller, if you think you are some legal scholar. Your argument, to say the least, sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
56. Omertá, omertá
An excerpt from an old 'Ndrangheta (Calabrian Mafia) tune - first in the original Calabrian dialect of Italian, then in English:

L' omertá é cumandamentu
Esti leggi saggia e giusta
Cu prestau lu giuramentu
Lu sgarrari assai ci custa

Occhiu tengu ma nun viu
Sugnu surdu e puru mutu
Sacciu i reguli di Diu
Ma restu sempri nu tambutu

Omertá, omertá
Chista é leggi societá
Leggi chi non perduna
A cu faci infamitá


Secrecy is a commandment
It's a law that's just and wise
Whosoever breaks his oath
He must pay - he knows the price

I have eyes, but I see nothing
I am deaf and mute as well
For I know the laws of God
And always keep them to myself

Code of silence, code of silence
It's the law of our society
A law that does not forgive
Those who break their secrecy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
60. Why do all of the republicans look constipated?
And the dems look like they have had their fiber today? Off topic, but damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM
Original message
Because they're full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #60
68. The repugs have been having gut feelings all week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #60
69. Freudian concept of anal retentiveness, to republicans shit is money
...so they hold onto it as long as they can!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
61. Rick Keller R-FL executive privilege = husband + wife privilege
...what an embarrassment this guy is, he suggests that executive privilege eliminates presidential YES-Men :spray: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #61
67. Guess that Harriet and GW were married afterall!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #67
71. that crossed my mind when Keller said it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #61
70. " We will stop mowing the lawn"
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:56 AM by IChing
If Iraq Keeps Shooting Us, We'll Stop Mowing Their Lawn: Great Moments in House Rhetoric



Florida Republican Ric Keller, speaking in favor of the Democratic Iraq withdrawal plan:

Let me give you an analogy. Imagine your next door neighbor refuses to mow his lawn and the weeds are all the way up to his waist. You decide you’re going to mow his lawn for him every single week. The neighbor never says thank you. He hates you and sometimes he takes out a gun and shoots at you.

Under these circumstances, do you keep mowing his lawn forever? Do you send even more of your family members over to mow his lawn? Or do you say to that neighbor, ‘You better step it up and mow your own lawn or there’s going to be serious consequences for you’?
We know they have “shoot first” laws out there in Florida, but this analogy still seems like a bit of a reach to us. Hell, Iraq’s a desert — how much maintenance could their lawn even need?

http://wonkette.com/politics/ric-keller/if-iraq-keeps-shooting-us-well-stop-mowing-their-lawn-great-moments-in-house-rhetoric-236773.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
64. How much gel does Keller put on his hair? Damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
65. Keller says, the courts will decide if exe. priv applies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #65
80. The court would have to rule not on executive privilege but whether or not
...the White House engaged in abuse of power and or criminal intent and that will be shown if they can get Meyers to testify under oath and in public
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
66. Idiot Keller keeps citing Nixon as his precedent
Apparently he doesn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #66
72. Well, I agree. But he is using the wrong one
Nixon also asserted that when the President did something, it wasn't illegal. He got shot down on that. He was required to turn over the tapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM
Original message
Interesting Hank Johnson trivia
I always like Johnson's contributions and was curious about his biography. He is a practicing Buddhist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #66
81. Would somebody tell these idiots that * fired 100% of the USA's also
Nobody questioned that, nor would they at this point. They wouldn't have questioned these firings if Gonzo wasn't such an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
73. Mr. Johnson laying it out clearly, supporting Conyers.
"Disrespect for the law" from a "Supreme Court nominee"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
74. OH MY GOD SHUT THESE IDIOT REPUBLICANS UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #74
77. It's always about Clinton. Never about Jimmy Carter, poor guy! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #74
86. B...B..but Clinton
Clinton did what every pres does at the beginning of his term...not mid way....and not just attorneys that would not investigate repubs...uggg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #86
99. Mr. Shampoo
rinse repeat rinse repeat....lie repeat lie repeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
75. Guess we know where the rethugs stand
protect the party right or wrong and fuck the country and its so-called constitutional law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
76. Notice how all the Cons are "moving to strike the last word"
Gives them extra time to say "Clinton did it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #76
84. They must be truly flustered
They haven't blamed it on Clinton's penis yet! That excuse must have slipped their mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #84
101. Considering recent developments, they are avoiding that part of the anatomy
if at all possible...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #101
109. hahah....good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #76
90. Just exactly what does that term mean?
"move to strike the last word". I have no idea what it means.

Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #90
120. They're confused. It's typically on the floor of the House during debate
http://www.c-span.org/questions/week104.asp

Moving to strike the last word is a parliamentary tactic to extend debate time during the amending process. The "last word" refers to the last word of the pending amendment or bill. Motions to strike the last word are actually nonsense amendments, or more technically, "pro forma" amendments (amendments in form only.) They are not meant to literally strike out the last word. Here's how it works.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #120
140. Thanks for the info Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
78. Tom Feeney
"Clinton fired them all!"

What an asswipe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #78
85. Thanks for feeding the cube rats, all!
I see I'm not missing much...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #85
91. It's hard to summarize the talking points by repukes because they are
...absurd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #91
96. No, it isn't! Here they are: "Clinton did it, and it was bad. We did it, and it was good."
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #78
89. I'd love to hear "Will the Gentleman yield" from the Dems
and ask this piece of shit WHEN Clinton "fired them all". Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
79. OMG!!!
If I hear one more Repuke talk about Clinton firing all the justices, I'm gonna scream!!!

He fired them at the BEGINNING of his term and under real, LEGAL reasons!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #79
82. But but Clinton!
Friggin' Feeney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #82
106. somebody there needs
reply to the B..B..But Clinton remark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #79
93. And so did Bush. That isn't something anybody is questioning
He had the right to do that. And he could have gotten away with this except for Gonzo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #79
94. Clinton didn't fire the one's he appointed. Bush did.
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM by Norquist Nemesis
generally speaking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #94
102. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
83. Oh, NOW the argument is simply "attorney-client", INSTEAD fo EP! Straw-grasping, anyone??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
87. so far the 'cons have not offered anything
by way of solving the problem of 6 years of none compliance, oversight, by them themselves. that should be criminal if nothing else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #87
98. So what else is new? They haven't offered anything since 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #98
134. I know but with being caught with their hands in the cookie jar so to speak
you'd think they would try to distance themselves rather than to continue the lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #134
135. mutual blackmail...
if there was election fraud - and there likely was - then some of these fine folks owe their seats to Miers and Rove and they will protect themselves at all costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #135
136. an example of why we the people need to clean house, both of 'em
so many in both parties are compromised to the point they can't do anything for us anymore. Everything they do no matter how much it looks on the surface that it is maybe good for us. Then after the dust has settled, it always turns out to have been for the have mores, everytime damn time, time and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
88. Bullshit Feeney, nobody is going to ask Miers anything dealing with
attorney client privilege, but stuff she said and advised with more than the Prez in the room are fair game.
Inherent contempt. Bring it on!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
92. Feeney made the idiot list on DU
Tom Feeney
Why did Florida House Speaker Tom Feeney call a news conference last week to defend one of his top legislative aides against questions about her job? Well, to be honest we're not really sure. But since he did, we thought we'd give you a bit of background on the 27-year-old policy staffer, Bridgette A. Gregory. Miss Gregory has no college degree, no technical experience for her job, and used to work as a waitress at Hooters. She is paid $55,664 per year. She can't spell, including, in some cases, her own name. Her work duties have got nothing to do with her job description. Oh yes, and she's apparently been working on Feeney's congressional campaign from his Capitol office, which is illegal. But she has a lovely set of gams and according to Tom Feeney himself, is "underpaid." That's why he gave her a 13 percent raise last June in "appreciation for your exemplary work performance." He added, "Oh, Miss Gregory, I think you dropped your pen."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/02/57.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
95. Feeney the weeney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
97. What a FREEPER!
Feeney is really pizzing me off. What's the matter with Harriet under oath? What do you repukes have to hide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #97
104. Hide everything that's what
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #97
107. How far UP the knowledge goes, that's what. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
100. Cannon doesn't like the house threatening Miers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
103. Seargant at Arms...Get your handcuffs ready!!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
105. Ha! They mention Clinton--but WE HAVE NIXON to throw in their face!!
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:03 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
108. Oh Lord
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:06 AM by Greylyn58
Can you believe these bastards actually had the nerve to talk about all the investigations tying things up and looking for crimes that don't exsist?

Gee...why does that sound familar? Oh yeah...BECAUSE YOU ASS-HATS DID IT ALL THROUGH CLINTONS YEARS IN OFFICE!!!!!!!!

Only difference here Dip-Shit is CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED BY THIS PRESIDENT!!!!!

:argh: :argh: :argh: :argh: :argh:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
110. The republicans are either nuts or just plane stupid.
Do they even know what the word "INVESTIGATION" means? I don't think so. I mean, they seem to think that you can't INVESTIGATE unless you already know everything you're looking for. Hey, morans...what would be the point of investigating ANYTHING if you already knew all the answers? Are you people really that stupid?

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
111. Anybody noticing the body language coming from Sanchez?
She chomping at the bit - she can't wait to say those lovely words that all liberals worldwide are waiting to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #111
113. Do they vote on the motion today?
If so, I'll skip lunch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #111
116. Yes a little, but I think she is leading the committee very well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
112. I motion for a 3rd thread in 50 more posts
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:05 AM by comtec
however I have nothing against a 300 post topic :)

-A patriot in Exile
edit:typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
114. Thread 3 up, mods please lock this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #114
118. Mods can we get some control over these threads????????? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
115. (Digression: Wait until you see Bush's facial expressions coming from today's Presser!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
117. Mods can we get some control over these threads?????????
None are locked nor combined etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #117
121. I apologize for #2, I was looking for the same heading for continuity
My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #121
125. None of them are locked yet
not your fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
119. Oh yes, Mr. Keller was so 'compelling' in his arguments! LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
122. There's another TRENT in Congress?
This one is just as much of a partisan douche bag as the other one.

Harriet Miers is NOT Mr. Bush's attorney. She is a private citizen.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
123. Please alert the mods for control over these threads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
124. Thank you for your 'concern', Mr. Franks
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
126. "It happened yesterday in the Senate Judiciary Committee"
Touche! Hooray for Conyers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nunyabiz Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
127. Woot MEL WATT
telling it like it is, I could swear I heard IMPEACHMENT put on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #127
129. He's called the President a LIAR
Duh!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #127
130. Waaah "Watt called the President a liar"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nunyabiz Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #130
131. Yes the TRUTH is clearly not allowed ever
If that were me I would be screaming in Cannons face and the "chairlady" should have Cannon removed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #130
132. The imperial president...
boy, repuke boy didn't like that did he, "unparlimentary lanquage"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC