|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM Original message |
*** Official House Judiciary Miers Didn't Show *** Thread 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
1. k & R and here is thread 1 for those who missed it: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. What about the violation of the subpoena |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:41 AM Original message |
Oh, he's just the water-boy! He understands everything! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Thanks Helderheid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
4. Conyers filed a motion to charge Miers with contempt last I read--am I correct? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. We live in a dictatorship ~ nothing that is right matters now nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. I don't think so, he seconded a motion that it was not acceptable for her not to show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Ah--okay. I'd call that setting the stage for something though. thanks for the clarification. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. Also available to viewed at the Committee's website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
10. Cannon wants the evidence....what a shit-head he wants the discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Cannon just made a point, but he was stopped by his attorneys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
11. Cannon sounds a little more reasonable after Sanchez's excellent speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jojo54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. IMO he sounds scared. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. He's a bit more deferential now, is he not?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
13. Cannon interrupted in his diatribe by Conyers. Conyers wants to make this simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
14. Good GOD Cannon is DENSE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. "What is it we're talking about here? Immunity? What?" What a MORAN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. No, he's acting chisel for the hour |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debau2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Can he beat this dead horse a little longer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
26. And as nervous as all heck! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
15. So now Cannon is "worried about the diminishment of our power"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #15 |
137. he means diminishment of repukes' power, no doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
17. God I can feel the tension through the internets! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Isn't that something? Me too--I think this is almost beeter than watching it; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:47 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Absolutely!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
22. The motion has been made to reject Miers claim of immunity and executive priviledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jojo54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
24. YOU GO GIRL!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
27. Sanchez getting pissed at Cannon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. "Does that clarify it for you?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:48 AM Response to Reply #36 |
138. bwahahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
29. I think this is the tipping point. I know that has been said before, but I feel it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnieworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #29 |
133. It's definitely a line in the sand moment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
30. "What we got here is an empty chair!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Original message |
As he represents the anger of the citizens of this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Please let a photo of that empty chair be the front page of every rag tomorrow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
31. Cannon is totally perplexed by the contempt motion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
32. I HATE introductory soliloquey's, GET to the point to what you want to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
33. Cohen! The Emperor cannot tell citizens to flaunt the law!!!! Go Cohen!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
34. The President, or the EMPEROR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debau2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
35. I LOVE MR COHEN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM Original message |
"This is as contemptuous as you can be...and you don't just show up!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jojo54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
37. This guy Cohen is telling it like it is!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. He rocks!!!!! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #37 |
59. Yep, they're committed now.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
38. MEANWHILE: Bush just said that Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah are ALL helping Al-Qaeda in Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libby2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
39. bwahahahah Emperor!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
41. Wow.............Cohen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Great speech, the emperor has no clothes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_Leo_Criley (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
42. LOL this is a gary trudeau cartoon without the feather! cohen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM Original message |
Steve Cohen D-TN refers to Bush as the emperor and the feather |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
44. GAry Trudeu live, all we ar missing is the feather what a hoot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
45. Did he just mention Harriet Woods?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Did he really? OMG--that's hysterical. Please tell me it's true! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM Original message |
I'm pretty sure that is what I heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #47 |
51. He did...called it Nixon Part Two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #51 |
62. Thanks--that is classic! I even remember the Woods "stretch..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #51 |
128. ...and this is the Huston Plan, Part II for anyone who followed Watergate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #51 |
139. LOL! Harriet Woods, great line! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
48. Oh Lord...now Keller |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. They have to know their argument holds no water. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #49 |
57. "Do you want to have a bunch of yes-men around the President" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debau2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Why is he reading his statements? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deminks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #53 |
58. Kkkarl and freddy just gave them to him. He hasn't seen them before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:53 AM Original message |
Political points? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #48 |
55. Well, he has been effing the country but a lot of us don't recognize the marriage. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greylyn58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #48 |
63. This Ass-Hat is unbelievable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
50. * is ALREADY surrounded by YES men THAT IS THE PROBLEM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
52. Mr. Keller is another moran. Ms. Sanchez just CITED PRECEDENT after PRECEDENT on EP!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
54. Keller: You are LEGALLY full of shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
56. Omertá, omertá |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
60. Why do all of the republicans look constipated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM Original message |
Because they're full of shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deminks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #60 |
68. The repugs have been having gut feelings all week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #60 |
69. Freudian concept of anal retentiveness, to republicans shit is money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
61. Rick Keller R-FL executive privilege = husband + wife privilege |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #61 |
67. Guess that Harriet and GW were married afterall! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:55 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. that crossed my mind when Keller said it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:55 AM Response to Reply #61 |
70. " We will stop mowing the lawn" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
64. How much gel does Keller put on his hair? Damn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
65. Keller says, the courts will decide if exe. priv applies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #65 |
80. The court would have to rule not on executive privilege but whether or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
66. Idiot Keller keeps citing Nixon as his precedent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:56 AM Response to Reply #66 |
72. Well, I agree. But he is using the wrong one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM Original message |
Interesting Hank Johnson trivia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #66 |
81. Would somebody tell these idiots that * fired 100% of the USA's also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
73. Mr. Johnson laying it out clearly, supporting Conyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
74. OH MY GOD SHUT THESE IDIOT REPUBLICANS UP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 AM Response to Reply #74 |
77. It's always about Clinton. Never about Jimmy Carter, poor guy! :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Epiphany4z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #74 |
86. B...B..but Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Epiphany4z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #86 |
99. Mr. Shampoo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A wise Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
75. Guess we know where the rethugs stand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
76. Notice how all the Cons are "moving to strike the last word" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debau2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #76 |
84. They must be truly flustered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #84 |
101. Considering recent developments, they are avoiding that part of the anatomy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debau2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:04 AM Response to Reply #101 |
109. hahah....good point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jojo54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #76 |
90. Just exactly what does that term mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #90 |
120. They're confused. It's typically on the floor of the House during debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jojo54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #120 |
140. Thanks for the info Norquist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
displacedtexan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
78. Tom Feeney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Witch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #78 |
85. Thanks for feeding the cube rats, all! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #85 |
91. It's hard to summarize the talking points by repukes because they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #91 |
96. No, it isn't! Here they are: "Clinton did it, and it was bad. We did it, and it was good." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #78 |
89. I'd love to hear "Will the Gentleman yield" from the Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jojo54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
79. OMG!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubyaD40web (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #79 |
82. But but Clinton! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Epiphany4z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #82 |
106. somebody there needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #79 |
93. And so did Bush. That isn't something anybody is questioning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #79 |
94. Clinton didn't fire the one's he appointed. Bush did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubyaD40web (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #94 |
102. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
83. Oh, NOW the argument is simply "attorney-client", INSTEAD fo EP! Straw-grasping, anyone?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
87. so far the 'cons have not offered anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #87 |
98. So what else is new? They haven't offered anything since 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #98 |
134. I know but with being caught with their hands in the cookie jar so to speak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lala_rawraw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #134 |
135. mutual blackmail... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #135 |
136. an example of why we the people need to clean house, both of 'em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
88. Bullshit Feeney, nobody is going to ask Miers anything dealing with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
92. Feeney made the idiot list on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
95. Feeney the weeney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubyaD40web (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
97. What a FREEPER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #97 |
104. Hide everything that's what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:03 AM Response to Reply #97 |
107. How far UP the knowledge goes, that's what. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
100. Cannon doesn't like the house threatening Miers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
103. Seargant at Arms...Get your handcuffs ready!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
105. Ha! They mention Clinton--but WE HAVE NIXON to throw in their face!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greylyn58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
108. Oh Lord |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
110. The republicans are either nuts or just plane stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jojo54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
111. Anybody noticing the body language coming from Sanchez? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debau2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Do they vote on the motion today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #111 |
116. Yes a little, but I think she is leading the committee very well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comtec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
112. I motion for a 3rd thread in 50 more posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
114. Thread 3 up, mods please lock this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #114 |
118. Mods can we get some control over these threads????????? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
115. (Digression: Wait until you see Bush's facial expressions coming from today's Presser!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
117. Mods can we get some control over these threads????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #117 |
121. I apologize for #2, I was looking for the same heading for continuity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #121 |
125. None of them are locked yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
119. Oh yes, Mr. Keller was so 'compelling' in his arguments! LOL!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
122. There's another TRENT in Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
123. Please alert the mods for control over these threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
124. Thank you for your 'concern', Mr. Franks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
126. "It happened yesterday in the Senate Judiciary Committee" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nunyabiz (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
127. Woot MEL WATT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #127 |
129. He's called the President a LIAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #127 |
130. Waaah "Watt called the President a liar" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nunyabiz (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #130 |
131. Yes the TRUTH is clearly not allowed ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #130 |
132. The imperial president... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC