Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Department of Homeland Security must be decommissioned, defunded, and DESTROYED

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 PM
Original message
The Department of Homeland Security must be decommissioned, defunded, and DESTROYED
Chertoff has proved once and for all that DHS serves no purpose for America - it only exists to make Herr Decider look good and to keep the rest of us peons scared and willing to sacrifice our Constitutional rights for an illusion of safety.

You want to be a candidate for the House, Senate, or the Presidency? Tell me you'll do away with DHS. Otherwise, I call upon all precinct chairs to start drafting resolutions calling for the end of DHS. Decommission it, defund it, destroy it.

We owe it to the people of New Orleans as well as our first responders all across the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed. It should never have existed.
It doesn't do anything positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thank you!
Keith Olbermann confirmed my feelings about the name, too. What kind of name is "Homeland Security," anyway? Who, except for the pro-Nazi German-American Bund, ever referred to America as their "homeland," anyway? Even the most militant Native Americans never used that term, as far as I can recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. bu$h used that yesterday. I cringed when he said something about protecting the "Homeland".
I hate that term, it pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. The only other historical use I can think of
The "bantustans" that S. Africa established under apartheid were called "homelands."

The word has a very far-right ring to it, wouldn't you say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Remake, remodel and fund
due to the incompetence of the Bush administration and his previous 'yes men' congress who happened to underfund DHS, the US is in danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. ???
DHS completely screwed up FEMA's attempt to intervene in the aftermath of Katrina. It's just another useless bureacracy siphoning money out of your wallet and mine, and I say the hell with DHS.

Keep FEMA, though - restore it to its original mission and give it the tools it needs to get the job done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. And how about drowned in a bathtub...
Hey I am just askin...I mean the Republiks wanted to destroy government anyway...so they destroyed their own creation.

Bwa..haw..haw...fucking idiots!

But on a more serious note they have wasted the last 4 years doing nothing.....When the head of DHS says he has a gut feelin...and that's all he's got....the country is in deep trouble...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Agreed. It serves no functional purpose.
All it does is put Der Assholefurher as prime dictator supreme and remind the general populace that he can fuck with you at any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. oh, it has a definite purpose: to keep america scared out of its wits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Eliminate 'Homeland' Security!!!
What are We, the Fourth Reich??? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. While we're at it, get rid of the word "homeland"
It sounds like Nazi Germany. I cringe every time I hear the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. That's the first thing I thought of when I heard the name for the new department
"Homeland" Security?? We sound like an empire (which we unfortunately are). The Klingon empire also comes to mind, with Klingon being the "home" planet. Who in this Administration came up with this one and why wasn't it just called "Department of DOMESTIC Security"?? Has a much more benign ring to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I wrote that on another thread this morning! I hate the term
"homeland" too. What ever happened to "national"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kick for the morning crew
Come on, coffee achievers! DHS delendum est!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. Do away with it entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Remember that Bush was "against DHS before he was for it"
He had a change of heart probably because he realized it could be used as a useful "tool" in spreading fear and terror among the US citizenry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. It fits nicely into his modus operandi: fear, yes I agree with you.
It's really a scarely and BIG department with way too much power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. what scares me is not their scare tactics, its that they have lost all credibility and need a MIHOP
in the US to regain their effectiveness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speakclearly Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. It might be good to remember....
The Department of Homeland Security was a creature created at the insistance of the Congress, and the idea was pushed by most of the Democratic Party leadership. For Dems to now call for it to end would be used against them as "flip-floppers". the DHS has only existed for about 3 years and that is a little close in proximity to when the Dems voted to create it, don't ya think? Ol' Lettucs head may be a bit squirrely, but what do you expect? To kill DHS in an effort to embarrass Bush would reflect negatively on Congressional Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. It serves a fucking purpose!
Drain the treasury! Now why would we want to do away with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. It is also serving a purpose of instilling fear into the populace
It's working beautifully for Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yes and take that War Czar with you!
and the phony Directorate of Intelligence and whatever they're calling Total Information Awareness nowadays sinc they "shut it down"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. Yes, the Drug Czar was the precursor to this
Now we have War Czar

Office of "Special Plans"

Der Homeland

Total Information Awareness

faith-based this'n'that

(Whatever that censorship of all science should be called.)



When ideologues start inventing names and terms, it is good to pay attention...'cause they're up to no damn good.

"A dictatorship would be a heckuva lot easier..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
20. Yes, and take the new War Czar with you

...and that phony Directorate of Intelligence. And whatever they're calling Total Information Awareness nowadays since they "shut it down"

Oh, and that so called job Karen Hughes is supposed to be doing, improving our public relations in the Muslim World. Heckuva Job, Sasquatch!

Take the whole bunch with you. And don't forget all those party hacks you stacked the Justice Department with in lifetime civil service positions. It's not going to be easy to get them out. Why don't you do it so we don't have to after you are gone?

And make no mistake--they will be gone.

Oh, who am I kidding. It's impossible to remove a bureaucracy once it's established, isn't it? Of course the Republicans have gotten pretty close to destroying FEMA, the Dept of Education and our military. It can be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. Along with the CIA, NSA, DARPA, etc
The only way a new agency is going to go away, is if it gets merged with other agencies, forming a larger agency. DHS isn't going anywhere. It might be renamed, like Total Information Awareness, but it's not going away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HonorTheConstitution Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. Homeland is a terrible term for a democratic country
As a born German I agree that this word creates goose bumps for me and people using it are as dangerous to our democracy as the worst fascists and dictators in history. But most people don't understand English semantics and roots of words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. By it's very usage, the term "homeland" denotes that we are an empire
The US is the "homeland" and we have far flung posessions overseas. If you are a "Trekkie", you'll be familiar with the term "homeworld", especially when used by the Klingon Empire. The word sends chills up my spine. BTW, It also is reminiscent of the term "motherland" that the USSR used to use.

You think they chose the term "homeland" by accident?? I don't think so!!

How about we rename it "Department of Domestic Security". A lot more benign than "Department of Homeland Security". Perhaps we could pressure the Dems to rename this department after we take back the WH in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. It's our on little bastille, is it not? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. It won't unless we elect Kucinich or someone like him.
This monster agency is going to be with us for a generation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. OR...
...unless enough of us pass resolutions at the county and state level to pressure our would-be legislators to dismantle DHS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Or maybe just have our state legislatures
not go along on a basis as an infringement (which might work).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
30. What was their purpose?
How do we know that feeling in Chertoff's gut wasn't just some undercooked potato.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yes - absolutely correct!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
32. But who will take over the all important "gut feeling" function?
We can't live without knowing Chertoff's stomach condition day to day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. Derby, YOU ROCK!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC