Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: No Progress Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 07:36 PM
Original message
NYT: No Progress Report
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/071307P.shtml

No Progress Report
The New York Times | Editorial

Friday 13 July 2007

With the American public in despair over the Iraq war and key members of his own party deserting him, President Bush is still trying to twist reality to claim that his failed effort is worth sticking with. Yesterday, the White House issued a report card claiming that Iraq's government had made limited progress on some political and security goals. And Mr. Bush insisted that not only was it not the time to talk about withdrawing American troops, but that he still believes that "the fight can be won."

That's been the spin for months. But Bob Woodward reported yesterday in The Washington Post that Mr. Bush's director of Central Intelligence, Gen. Michael Hayden, warned the bipartisan Iraq Study Group last fall that the "the inability" of the Iraqi government to govern "seems irreversible" and he could not point to "any milestone or checkpoint where we can turn this thing around."

A closer look at Mr. Bush's hyped report card leads to that same grim conclusion. Eight months after General Hayden issued his warning, the United States still has no effective Iraqi government partner committed to an effective program of national reconciliation and no effective Iraqi military capable of acting independently in the absence of American troops.

Officially, the White House credited the Iraqi government with satisfactory performance on 8 of the 18 listed benchmarks, not considered a passing grade in most tests. And most of the claimed successes were partial, or minor. Even the easy graders at the White House had to conclude that there has not been satisfactory progress toward ensuring that Iraqi forces evenhandedly uphold the law, nor progress toward eliminating militia control of local security, nor progress toward equitable distribution of oil revenues nor toward reforming discriminatory anti-Baathist legislation.

The original point of these benchmarks was to spur recalcitrant Iraqi leaders into taking the steps necessary to rescue their country, and Mr. Bush's Iraq policy, from the gathering flames of civil war. That is why Congress wanted to link these report cards to a clear threat of scaled-back American support if the Iraqi authorities failed to measure up. Mr. Bush's veto removed that useful threat, diminishing any real incentive for Iraqis to take the hard steps required. They haven't, and now America needs to act on its own.

Mr. Bush still refuses to talk about what almost everyone else now understands is essential: the need to develop an orderly plan to extricate American troops from a lost cause and reposition them in ways that can genuinely protect our national interests. A new classified study by the intelligence community offers one more reminder why continued delay and delusion is so dangerous. It says that six years after the Sept. 11 attacks Al Qaeda has rebuilt itself and has settled into safe havens in Pakistan.

-------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. bush is so out to lunch
bin Laden & the Taliban top free
al Qaeda stronger than before 9/11
Iraq in a civil war
Iraq has no real government, military, or police
money flowing into al Qaead thanks to our war in Iraq
much of Afghanistan under Taliban control
and we are bogged down in a no win shit hole in Iraq.

Spin that bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to write my own report card too.
& why not make it half good/half bad if you know it's ALL bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think it is time for the neocon times to come clean.
"Mr. Bush still refuses to talk about what almost everyone else now understands is essential: the need to develop an orderly plan to extricate American troops from a lost cause and reposition them in ways that can genuinely protect our national interests."

Yes well then what exactly and specifically, in the opinion of the editorial board of the neocon times, are these national interests that require more than $650,000,000,000 a year of our taxpayer dollars to protect?

Isn't it time to have that discussion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC