Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Falwell: Return of Fairness Doctrine Spells Danger to Religious Broadcasters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:54 AM
Original message
Falwell: Return of Fairness Doctrine Spells Danger to Religious Broadcasters
FALWELL CONFIDENTIAL
Insider weekly newsletter to The Moral Majority Coalition and
The Liberty Alliance http://www.moralmajority.com <http://www.moralmajority.com/>

From: Jonathan Falwell
Date: July 13, 2007

Return of Fairness Doctrine Spells Danger to Religious Broadcasters

On June 29, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) introduced the Broadcaster Freedom Act, a bill that would prevent the restoration of the Fairness Doctrine by the Federal Communications Commission.

There has been growing speculation on Capitol Hill that Democrats will seek to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine under the guise that conservative talk radio is disproportionately dominating American radio. The liberal agenda has not been able to gain a foothold on radio, even though it is predominate in virtually every other form of mass media.

Conservatives say if Democrats want to counter the messages of popular radio broadcasters, they should do so by placing entertaining liberal radio hosts on the airwaves, not by having the government mandate that radio stations afford equal time to leftist radio voices. Sen. Pence’s bill is just the beginning of the fight.

“The fight for freedom on the American airwaves is not over,” said Sen. Pence in introducing his legislation. “With many still hoping to resurrect the Fairness Doctrine, we must continue to stay on the offense. Unless Congress addresses this threat to free speech, any future administration could impose this unfair doctrine upon America with the stroke of a pen.”

Mr. Pence’s bill is a temporary solution to the problem, as it places a one-year moratorium that prohibits any funding to the FCC for the enforcement of the Fairness Doctrine.

“While I am pleased that 309 Members of Congress supported this short-term fix, it is my hope that they will continue to stand for freedom of speech by joining me in a long-term solution to the problem by passing the Broadcaster Freedom Act. There is nothing fair about the Fairness Doctrine.”

The fairness doctrine, overturned by the FCC in 1987, was part of a 1949 FCC regulation requiring broadcasters to “afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views of public importance.”

Democrats would like to level the playing field of the radio airwaves through government action, largely because liberals have been unsuccessful in challenging conservative and conservative-leaning radio icons such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Neal Boortz and several others.

The return of the Fairness Doctrine would also negatively affect Christian radio.
Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice, who hosts the nationally syndicated “Jay Sekulow Live” radio broadcast, is also concerned about an effort to codify speech on the national airwaves, especially for Christian broadcasters.

In a recent commentary, he said that “30 minutes of religious or conservative broadcasting would have to be balanced with 30 minutes of the opposing viewpoint, even if it aired on Christian radio.”

It is apparent that the left is serious about eradicating the enormous influence of conservative talk radio.

Let’s be clear though. As Christians, our concern should be much greater than the threat to conservative and Christian talk radio. I don’t think it accidental that the First Amendment embodies our two greatest freedoms – freedom of speech and freedom of religion. These go hand in hand.

My Dad knew this well. He unequivocally stood firm against a return to any type of “equal time” Fairness Doctrine, or any other restriction that would censor Christian truth. He was routinely attacked for this stand by liberals. But Dad knew that dangerous proposals like the Fairness Doctrine and so-called “hate crimes” legislation are the opposite of our precious First Amendment freedoms. They are two quick steps on a slippery slope to full-blown censorship of anyone who dares to preach the Bible.

In Canada, where such radical doctrines have already taken hold, our ministry’s television broadcast has for years faced censorship of any reference that was deemed to be politically incorrect.

Liberal forces in Washington would like nothing better than to similarly restrict or silence the ministries and pulpits of pro-family and pro-life voices like Dr. James Dobson, Dr. John Hagee, Dr. Franklin Graham or any Bible-preaching pastor.

Writing on WorldNetDaily.com, Ron Strom quoted NRB president Frank Wright as saying that giving equal time to the opponents of Christianity by Fairness Doctrine legislation could mean “the end of Christian broadcasting as we know it.”

Christians need to be prepared to go to battle to guard against any future efforts aimed at silencing or diluting conservative and Christian radio broadcasts. The Bible tells us clearly in Mark 16:15 “… Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature.”

The so-called Fairness Doctrine would serve as the first step in hindering Christians around the world from doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Listen Falwell
Fuck you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Fairness is un-Christian." - Spence
"What would Jesus do? We morally superior entities here in Falwell land HAVE CHANNELED HIS SPIRIT AND THUS KNOW FOR CERTAIN he would take a stand for un-fairness. Smirk, smirk, smirk."

- Spence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, Fallwell! " Suck it! Suck it!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. hahahahaha
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. they own the stations
and as long as there is no political statements they are in the clear..falwell is just raising money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, _Jonathon_ Falwell. I was about to ask 'who forgot to drive in the wooden stake?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. LOL!
This is his son. I was debating about posting any of this emails and canceling getting them, since the big one's gone, but since they're pretty much what Jerry would say, I figured to keep going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. and "christian radio" didn't thrive pre-1987?
You mean it was driven off the air by those mean liberals until Saint Ronnie eliminated the fairness doctrine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. I've made it a point in life to ignore the likes of the fucker fallwell.
talk about irrelevancy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. This man has no faith in the power of his god, who no doubt, could give a rip about equal time
they're paralyzed by fear - have faith brother...your god will not abandon you, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. hey Rev - no danger - keep the broadcasts religious but devoid
of political content - and there is no problem. Only when you try to merge your religion with a single political party is there a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. No, that would be the "Anti-Bullshit Doctrine" which would endanger the Thumpers
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC