Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Juror: oral sex is not sex

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 03:47 PM
Original message
Juror: oral sex is not sex
Juror: oral sex is not sex
Beeville man accused of sexual contact with a 6-year-old child gets 10 years in prison


A 28-year-old Beeville man accused of molesting a 6-year-old girl last summer was sentenced to 10 years in prison on Thursday.

Ten of the jurors wanted to give Edward Lee Robinson more time behind bars but one juror didn’t believe oral sex constituted sex.

“We really wanted him to get more time but I guess we have to be satisfied with 10 years because one juror insisted on no more than five years,” said Assistant District Attorney Deborah Branch. “She didn’t think oral sex was sex.”

Robinson faced a sentence of 5-99 years in prison.
Corpus Christi attorney Michelle Ochoa represented Robinson, who told jurors the little girl was a liar.

The 6-year-old girl testified and offered jurors some details of the event, Branch said.
The girl’s mother also testified as did a nurse who deals with sexual assaults, a member of the Child Protective Service, a San Antonio patrol officer, a detective with the San Antonio Police Department’s sexual crime unit and Beeville Police Sgt. Mike Willow.

http://www.bee-picayune.com/story1.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm gonna pre-empt the freepers and say...
It's definitely Clinton's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phildo Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Texas laws are real clear that when molesting children it includes any gentail touch to anus, mouth,
etc., etc. etc.

The juror was just being a jack-off.

May the blessings of Karma find that Juror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. That juror was using a left wing argument to advance a perverted agenda
And of course, if I had to bet, I'd bet the juror is a registered Republican.

Perhaps one with a Dildo Reilly attitude: The kid brought it on herself!!! She DESERVED it!!!

Oral sex may not be sex, but any contact by an adult with a child is ASSAULT.

Karma, indeed. It can't come round too soon, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. THIS HAPPENED TO A CHILD, YOU IDIOT!
Edited on Sat Jul-14-07 03:55 PM by rocknation
Oral sex with a 6-year old IS sex because it's RAPE. He should have gotten at least twenty years!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. LIFE
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. That is so sick and what would posses a person to do such a thing to a child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. As a former Child Protective Services social worker .. (retired in 2000) ...
I got to say ... THIS is the stupidest thing I've ever seen, and some D.A. did a crappy job of explaining Life, the Universe, & Everything to this juror. Upon reading further, I guess he tried, through the witnesses. Maybe, where he goofed up, was when he didn't use one of his challenges to get rid of the dumbass.

Dear Juror: it's all about the violence and control, Stupid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phildo Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Bless you for protecting the children.
CPS has to be hardest duty I can think of in the world.

Thank you for your service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. And, thank you.
My sissie is still active.

The job just makes you paranoid - you realize that Life can go straight to H*ll in a flat second (with a wrong choice).

We adopted, and I wanted to spend more time with Her Royal Highness. I retired, and went back to law school, and wound up in real estate investment, and helping Hubby with the computer companies. I'm much happier. I think that people should only be in a public service job for so long; some do last 30 years or so, though.

I only recently allowed Beloved Daughter to go over to a friend's, with the parents there, and she's ten!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phildo Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Yeah I hear you.
I did a couple years of abuse recovery volunteer work after wandering into Big Brothers. It is a weird, weird world out there.

Happy times helping folks, though. Sort of miss it, but like you say, you cannot live it. Got real human for the experience, so that is a blessing -- considering I started as an Uber Engineer and Army Officer (real jerk :) )

Cool part was I met Mrs. Phil in that -- she is a Social Worker type, too. Said she had to meet me because she had never seen a guy be so loving to the hurt kids and folks. Me. A (mostly) former jerk. Best comment I have gotten in my life.

We have three kids, now, too. And tend to be sort of freaky protective, too.

Some day we might do work in an outdoor camp for kids.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Boy, do I relate to what you are saying!
It would be great one day if you did organize a camp.

My sis and I talk about starting a non-profit, maybe to help kids in the System, one day, but I've got some things to take care of first, probably just like you and your wife.

You're probably like my hubby - seemed kind of gruff when I first met him - but he has a heart of gold. We've lasted three decades now.

Take care! It was great having a conversation. I meet such nice people here! The personal stories - well, I gain a great deal from reading them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phildo Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. And yeah on take care of your own buisness, first part.
That is even Jesus stuff in that -- get the log out of your eye before helping your brother get the twig out of his.

Or I sort like the Airline Stewardess speech version: "Put on your own Oxygen mask first before helping your children."

Works on the National level, too. It is why I am a Fix America, First sort.


The camp stuff is called Wilderness Therapy. Sort of big in Oregon -- so that is pretty high on the list of where home should be. But there are camps in Vermont and Tennesee, too. One in East Texas (near here) closed a couple years ago. :(

Mrs. Phil did wilderness stuff as a mountain guide / counselor for kids while she was in undergrad school. I was/am fairly outdoorsy -- Army Combat Arms, and construction, so that all seems like a good mix.

You take care, too. See you again in this life time, or next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Sounds wonderful. Take care (n/t)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. What a chapter in a life well lived! Bravo to you for doing that hard work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. hmmm... I wonder if I held a gun to this juror's temple, then made him
cut his own jugular vein... would it be murder.. or suicide?

Stupid people like this don't deserve to breathe the same air that I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder
Does Texas law recognize a difference between molesting a child and full on rape of a child?

All I can figure is perhaps there are other criminals who got 7 or 10 years for full on rape and serious physical damage of a child and this juror thought giving the same sentence for oral sex that leaves no physical damage (emotional damage is a given) was not "fair".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phildo Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. For TMI, Texas Penal Code
No way the juror could have misunderstood this >>>

=========================

§ 21.11. INDECENCY WITH A CHILD. (a) A person commits an
offense if, with a child younger than 17 years and not the person's
spouse, whether the child is of the same or opposite sex, the
person:

(1) engages in sexual contact with the child or causes
the child to engage in sexual contact; or

(2) with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire
of any person:

(A) exposes the person's anus or any part of the person's genitals, knowing the child is present; or

(B) causes the child to expose the child's anus or any part of the child's genitals.

(b) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this
section that the actor:

(1) was not more than three years older than the victim
and of the opposite sex;
(2) did not use duress, force, or a threat against the
victim at the time of the offense; and
(3) at the time of the offense:

(A) was not required under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, to register for life as a sex offender; or

(B) was not a person who under Chapter 62 had a
reportable conviction or adjudication for an offense under this
section.

(c) In this section, "sexual contact" means the following
acts, if committed with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual
desire of any person:

(1) any touching by a person, including touching through clothing, of the anus, breast, or any part of the genitals of a child; or
(2) any touching of any part of the body of a child, including touching through clothing, with the anus, breast, or any
part of the genitals of a person.

(d) An offense under Subsection (a)(1) is a felony of the
second degree and an offense under Subsection (a)(2) is a felony of
the third degree.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974.
Amended by Acts 1981, 67th Leg., p. 472, ch. 202, § 3, eff. Sept.
1, 1981; Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 1028, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987;
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts
1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1415, § 23, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001,
77th Leg., ch. 739, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. "and not the person's spouse..."
I'll just sit with that for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hmm. I wonder how much time he would've gotten if he was growing pot for cancer patients.
Probably a lot more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That would b life in prison. Don't you know that is terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phildo Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Texas Prison has its own justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. How sad the girl had to testify.
What a complete and utter nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oral sex is not sex??
I think I'll go out and get a hummer now and then use that excuse on my wife. She'll then begin channeling Lorena Bobbitt on my manhood. That excuse didn't fly when Clinton did it and it doesn't fly now. What the hell is wrong with this juror??

BTW, before I get "flamed" on this, I AM NOT advocating that I was for Clinton's impeachment!! His dalliance and failing was private and should have been between him, his family and his God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Oral sex is not sex??
What is it then? Of course, in this case it was child abuse. However, in other cases, what is oral contact with genital organs considered to be? Bill Clinton was a jerk for saying "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." It was at that moment that I realized what a Con Artist he really was and still is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Anyone wanna take bets the sexless juror is having an affair?
Edited on Sat Jul-14-07 05:17 PM by Cerridwen
I'd bet almost any amount of money that the juror who refused to define oral sex as sex (it's even in the damned name) is having an affair which hasn't yet resulted in whatever the hell she defines as sex but which includes oral and this is her mental masturbatory exercise in denial that she's actually committing adultery.

Bets? Odds?


edit; fixed broken tag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's Close enough for rock~n~ roll and Government work I reckon. and me
Edited on Sat Jul-14-07 06:47 PM by nosmokes
edit because i can't type. or proofread.


for that matter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'll bet that juror was a 20-something. This claim has been a teen-age boy's dream come true.
Edited on Sat Jul-14-07 06:38 PM by WinkyDink
HE knows it's sex!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. Define 'sex'.
Don't get me wrong, the juror is a cretin.

But any unclothed genitalia that touches any part of another person is sexual contact. Case closed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. In this case it's child abuse, but for consenting adults I don't consider it sex.
Sure it is sexual contact for the purpose of an orgasm, but it isn't the act of sex. I might be alone on this, but that's just how I feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. So, if a man forces a woman to perform oral sex, is it not rape?
Makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Maybe you didn't read the part about consenting adults.
Of course it's rape (or more accurately sodomy). The woman is forced to perform a sexual act against her will, but I wouldn't consider it sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. I missed that --
so my apologies. I still have to disagree about it being sex though - if my husband did that with another woman, I would consider it sex lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. RAPE DOES NOT = SEX
Genitals coming into contact with another person's body, especially the body of a child, is sexual assault.

I hate the universe sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
34. He won't make it through those 10 years.


I believe the term is "short-eyes."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC