madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 02:01 PM
Original message |
The Democratic leadership cannot be accussed of acting in haste in any way |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-16-07 02:11 PM by madokie
one thing about it if by chance we do get an impeachment resolution the 'cons won't be able to say the dems rushed into this without thinking this through or whatever it is that they'll say.
edit
|
ClassWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They'll say it anyway, which is why we shouldn't worry about what they say. |
|
Just assume they'll say the worst and be prepared to knock it down.
NGU.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
the 'cons are so transparent
|
AndyA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Thank you! I wish more people understood this fact. |
|
They're going to say it anyway, and if it isn't true they're going to make up "facts" to support their position.
To hell with them. Do what needs to be done, and tell the Republicans to go take a flying leap.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
they can't but the will anyway pretty much explains the whole bush* cabal
|
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
4. or, had a predetermined ambition to pull Bush and Cheney down |
|
that's the point in the Speaker's rhetorical distancing of her office from the pursuit of an impeachment. Impartiality will be an asset if it comes to such a confrontation with the Executive, especially if the charges originate solely from our own party.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
and I thought it was a good smart strategry
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |