MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 08:19 PM
Original message |
argh...Joan Walsh and Dan Abrams are missing the whole point |
|
in their argument with Tucker Carlson.
Carlson argues that private sexual matters should always be that way, and Abrams and Walsh are hypocrites for attacking Vitter.
Tucker;
Dan Abrams and Joan Walsh are NOT THE GOVERNMENT! They're not trying to legislate their beliefs. Vitter IS the fucing government, and he wanted to use the power of law to impose his beliefs on others!
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Dan Abrams made that point |
|
that Vitter is the government etc.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. True but the point about making laws to |
|
enforce his views on others is a valid one.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yes, it sure as hell is |
|
Dan and Joan got it and tried to make that very point over Tucker's filibustering.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Don't pick on Dan! He DID say Vitters had family values and |
|
morals as HIS platform, and if he's a Senator and breaches the things He fights against all the time, he deserves to be exposed and attacked for it! Joan was a lot milder, but I think she got her point across too.
|
Evergreen Emerald
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Really? Vitters did not think so when Clinton's private consensual |
|
sexual stupidity was exposed. Where was Tucker then?
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Tucker joined the repuke chorus |
Exultant Democracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-16-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
8. We're paying for the repunk's hookers |
|
and his friggin' diapers too.
Tucker has no problem with that ??!!! Well geez Tuck, didn't know that was your style. I guess we all should've seen the bowtie as a desperate cry for ... a change.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
he visited the DC hookers before he was a Senator. The diaper thing is just a lame rumor.
|
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-17-07 06:44 AM by C_U_L8R
|
radfringe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 03:29 AM
Response to Original message |
10. I want a bumper sticker that says |
|
You don't tell me how to pray, and I won't call you a hypocrite
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message |