Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leahy, Durbin, Feingold: "DOJ Counsel HAS BROKEN THE LAW"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 04:14 PM
Original message
Leahy, Durbin, Feingold: "DOJ Counsel HAS BROKEN THE LAW"
Edited on Thu Jul-19-07 04:17 PM by kpete
Senators: Justice Department's Chief Counsel Breaking the Law
By Paul Kiel - July 19, 2007, 4:24 PM
Nothing surprises me any more.

Four Democratic senators wrote Alberto Gonzales today to inquire whether Stephen Bradbury, the apparent acting head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, was illegally carrying out his duties.

Bradbury was nominated for the top spot at OLC last year, but the Senate Judiciary Committee returned his nomination to the president, refusing to hear it until Bradbury's role in approving the National Security Agency's surveillance program became clear. The President shut down an internal Justice Department investigation of the matter last year by taking the unprecedented and unexplained step of denying security clearances to investigators from the Office of Professional Responsibility.

In the letter, written by Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT), along with Sens. Durbin (D-IL), Kennedy (D-MA), and Feingold (D-WI), the senators say that since it's been more than 210 days since the Senate returned the nomination to the President, Bradbury should not be carrying out the duties for the spot under the Vacancies Act. But that certainly appears to be what is happening.

............

Think about it: Bradbury's advice meant that Miers did not need to testify to Congress about whether she plotted to circumvent the Senate confirmation process in order to replace independent-minded U.S. attorneys with political cronies. As a committee staffer put it, "This appears to be yet another attempt by this Administration to circumvent the confirmation process in order to install a controversial nominee in a key Justice Department post, and now, ironically, that nominee is involved in protecting the Administration’s efforts to circumvent the confirmation process." Yikes.

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003728.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. So what ya gonna do bout it? huh? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We're going to seriously fret, wring our hands, shake our heads
Then we'll move on to being perturbed and upset. We'll be on tenterhooks with butterflies in our stomach, get twitchy, jittery and in a dither.

After being so strung out, we'll get squirrelly and start pacing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. ROFL!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. after w declares martial law next year he will just toss them in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC