Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH Forbids Rep. DeFazio (D) Access to Security Plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:50 AM
Original message
WH Forbids Rep. DeFazio (D) Access to Security Plans
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/118489654058910.xml&coll=7

DeFazio asks, but he's denied access
Classified info - The congressman wanted to see government plans for after a terror attack
Friday, July 20, 2007
JEFF KOSSEFF
The Oregonian Staff

WASHINGTON -- Oregonians called Peter DeFazio's office, worried there was a conspiracy buried in the classified portion of a White House plan for operating the government after a terrorist attack.

As a member of the U.S. House on the Homeland Security Committee, DeFazio, D-Ore., is permitted to enter a secure "bubbleroom" in the Capitol and examine classified material. So he asked the White House to see the secret documents.

On Wednesday, DeFazio got his answer: DENIED.

"I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack," DeFazio says.

Homeland Security Committee staffers told his office that the White House initially approved his request, but it was later quashed. DeFazio doesn't know who did it or why.

"We're talking about the continuity of the government of the United States of America," DeFazio says. "I would think that would be relevant to any member of Congress, let alone a member of the Homeland Security Committee."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't tell anybody but I don't think there ARE any plans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's the NOLA Plan. The contracts are probably already
written up and in a drawer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Our representatives need to see that for themselves, but I don't believe
...that for one minute. There are plans and those plans are sinister and will bring down the Constitutional government of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. They Won't Let ANY Democrats in Congress See The Plans
Because the plans call for them to all be rounded up and…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, they are so up to no good.
What I don't understand, and I would bet money THEY don't understand, is wtf they think will enforce their seizure of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. These fascist BushCo bastards must be stopped now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's because the plans don't include a "congress"
You don't need to see it because buddy you ain't in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. I read somewhere that the drafters decided Congress would be too hard to reconstitute...
... and that the continuity of government plans DO NOT include a Congress.

Sure would make it easier to run the dictatorship that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. Then DeFazio needs to get on national TV and confront them.
The Keith Olbermann show is probably the only possibility, given the current state of the media. But he needs to ask that question in front of the entire country and get everyone talking about it: "Is the reason I wasn't allowed to see the continuity of government plan because it doesn't include a Congress?" And keep asking, and get everyone asking, until they are forced to answer yes or no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
55. Ditto. Out of a job. .. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. well, folks, this crapola just keeps coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. We need to have Nancy ask the same question. Let's see them
turn her down. And when they do, that will just piss more people off and their polls with drop again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. FUCK POLLS.
We need a rope.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. If they hang themselves, it'll be better for everyone but
I hear you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. And also Senator Reid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't know why anyone thinks Defazio would have been allowed in
Unless and until people are held accountable- and pay some serious penalties, I can't imagine why the administration would grant the Democrats ANYTHING.

What are they going to do about it? Whine to the corporate media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. The corporate media is losing viewers/readers in droves.
This cosy little arrangement these jerks have enjoyed can't last much longer, imo. Unless, that is, they can figure out how to incite another crazy wave of nationalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Ratings Don't Matter. They Are Sacrificing Ratings to Help the Repigs, Who Help Their Parent Corps.
It ISN'T about ratings. It hasn't been about ratings for some time now.

If it WERE about ratings, don't you think they would have done something with the
prostitution scandals (one of which even took place at the WATERGATE Hotel!)
They have had more juicy scandals to report than in the past 100 years,
so what do we get? Paris Hilton. They are sacrificing ratings, big time, to
help the repigs. Their parent corporations want the Repigs, and they want war.
War is more profitable to GE than good ratings could possibly be.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. I get it about the parent war profiteers but, there is a tension there,
imho, that will only increase as the Thugs go down in flames this cycle.

I can hope, right? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Dems can restore the 'fairness rules' that got tossed a few yrs back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. The Thugs are selling it as censorship. Yes, we should try to get it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #37
51. Oh but the Thugs should be in favor of the Fairness Doctrine
Then they would be treated fairly by the liberal news media.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonmoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
57. time for another false flag terror attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. DeFazio Rocks
Although I have David Wu as my rep to the North, Defazio rocks.

It tells us that they either dont have a plan, or they are planning something along with the CIA
with another 9/11 terror attack....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Come on Nancy, how much more is it going to take WTF!!!
Three seperate but equal branches huh? We don't even have the right to know who our dictators will be when they take over? Guess we'll just call him/her Big Brother/Sister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. The entire committee should ask to see the documents. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
47. Hell, the entire Senate and House should ask!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. They're doing it because they consider the Legislative Branch irrelevant, and
would *love* to have a chance to prove it before their now-loaded Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. "bubbleroom" ?
Is that like the Cone of Silence from "Get Smart"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone_of_Silence


If so, that explains a lot about this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
52. That's what I thought when I read the OP
Cone of Silence, heh heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. even the American Enterprise Institute, thinks this is stupid



Bush administration spokesman Trey Bohn declined to say why DeFazio was denied access: "We do not comment through the press on the process that this access entails. It is important to keep in mind that much of the information related to the continuity of government is highly sensitive."

Norm Ornstein, a legal scholar who studies government continuity at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said he "cannot think of one good reason" to deny access to a member of Congress who serves on the Homeland Security Committee.

"I find it inexplicable and probably reflective of the usual, knee-jerk overextension of executive power that we see from this White House," Ornstein said.

This is the first time DeFazio has been denied access to documents. DeFazio has asked Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., to help him access the documents.

"Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right," DeFazio said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Link??
please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
45. It's the link in the original post
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. K+R
this is important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Senate and House Dems must demand answers in unison!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. Do I have this right? They aren't going to tell us what camps we're
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 12:39 PM by snappyturtle
going to be assigned to after a false flag terra-ist attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. What can you do? HR333 is a good start Congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. didn't he see the Presidential Directive 51.
maybe we should send that to him, would that help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. Once again I'm going to write to the House critters to impeach! NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. Now that's odd in a suspicious way.
Hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. I did call Nancy's office. She does have access to those plans
per her staffer. Is that a good thing or not, I can't tell. :(

Now I have to bookmark this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Has she actually SEEN them, or does she just think she can because that's what the LAW says?
DeFazio is legally entitled to see those, but look what
happened when he tried to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Her staff told me she had access.
But, I didn't think to ask if she'd seen them or if she's asked to see them.

Maybe I'll call back on Monday. If I call too often, they'll take out a restraining order, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. I just called left msg w/ my number
I said I wanted to know whether she actually will confirm she has seen these plans herself, or is just under the impression she has authority to (as DeFazio believed he did to, only to find he was denied access.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Thank you, halobeam!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. at least thats what she thinks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I have to call again on Monday. I don't trust any interaction
our leaders have with this White House. There is not reason to trust it -- which is different than distrusting Nancy and Harry. I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. These retards are un-f*cking-believable.....


K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
38. kick !!!!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
44. Scary K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
46. More of the same. *Co continues its subterfuge. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
48. "Peter DeFazio's office, worried there was a conspiracy buried..."
Notice how they try to marginalize him with that little statement, sometimes the corporate media's propaganda is too obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
49. Bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
50. I know what their plan is after a terrorist attack...
... Bush stands on the pile of rubble with a bullhorn, smirks and shouts "I can't hear you"...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. Then they invade some country that had nothing to do with the attack.
Some country chosen at random. Say, Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
54. he should return with the Sergeant-at-Arms
and about twenty armed guards and demand entrance

Damn there are so many things popping, one of them has to boil over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
56. My head is now exploding on a daily basis.
The fascism turn has almost been complete. Just a few more turns of the screw and we won't even be able to save America,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonmoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #56
59. perhaps the screw has been turned farther than you think.
perhaps america is already beyond saving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
58. They didn't want 'em to see how the Halliburton Homeland Security Detention Camps
will be used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
60. The plan is simple; Bush has already declared he will take over all
3 branches of government. We must never let that happen. No. 1 he is too incompetent to breathe and no. 2 he will never relinquish that power once he gains it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC