|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:50 AM Original message |
WH Forbids Rep. DeFazio (D) Access to Security Plans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. Don't tell anybody but I don't think there ARE any plans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. It's the NOLA Plan. The contracts are probably already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Our representatives need to see that for themselves, but I don't believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. They Won't Let ANY Democrats in Congress See The Plans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. Oh, they are so up to no good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
3. These fascist BushCo bastards must be stopped now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
5. That's because the plans don't include a "congress" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
31. I read somewhere that the drafters decided Congress would be too hard to reconstitute... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
41. Then DeFazio needs to get on national TV and confront them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 01:38 AM Response to Reply #5 |
55. Ditto. Out of a job. .. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. well, folks, this crapola just keeps coming! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
7. We need to have Nancy ask the same question. Let's see them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. FUCK POLLS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. If they hang themselves, it'll be better for everyone but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. And also Senator Reid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
9. I don't know why anyone thinks Defazio would have been allowed in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. The corporate media is losing viewers/readers in droves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. Ratings Don't Matter. They Are Sacrificing Ratings to Help the Repigs, Who Help Their Parent Corps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. I get it about the parent war profiteers but, there is a tension there, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Dems can restore the 'fairness rules' that got tossed a few yrs back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. The Thugs are selling it as censorship. Yes, we should try to get it done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #37 |
51. Oh but the Thugs should be in favor of the Fairness Doctrine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 08:11 AM Response to Reply #14 |
57. time for another false flag terror attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parche (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
13. DeFazio Rocks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
15. Come on Nancy, how much more is it going to take WTF!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pingzing58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. The entire committee should ask to see the documents. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MetaTrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
47. Hell, the entire Senate and House should ask! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
17. They're doing it because they consider the Legislative Branch irrelevant, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
18. "bubbleroom" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #18 |
52. That's what I thought when I read the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
19. even the American Enterprise Institute, thinks this is stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Link?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
45. It's the link in the original post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
20. K+R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
22. The Senate and House Dems must demand answers in unison! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
24. Do I have this right? They aren't going to tell us what camps we're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
25. What can you do? HR333 is a good start Congressman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
27. didn't he see the Presidential Directive 51. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
28. Once again I'm going to write to the House critters to impeach! NOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
29. Now that's odd in a suspicious way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
32. I did call Nancy's office. She does have access to those plans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 01:14 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Has she actually SEEN them, or does she just think she can because that's what the LAW says? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Her staff told me she had access. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. I just called left msg w/ my number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Thank you, halobeam! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. at least thats what she thinks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. I have to call again on Monday. I don't trust any interaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
33. These retards are un-f*cking-believable..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
38. kick !!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
44. Scary K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
46. More of the same. *Co continues its subterfuge. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
48. "Peter DeFazio's office, worried there was a conspiracy buried..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-20-07 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
49. Bastards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
50. I know what their plan is after a terrorist attack... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 12:44 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Then they invade some country that had nothing to do with the attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
54. he should return with the Sergeant-at-Arms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
56. My head is now exploding on a daily basis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 08:13 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. perhaps the screw has been turned farther than you think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
58. They didn't want 'em to see how the Halliburton Homeland Security Detention Camps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
60. The plan is simple; Bush has already declared he will take over all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC