Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"U.S. attorneys are emanations of a president's will."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:38 PM
Original message
"U.S. attorneys are emanations of a president's will."
Glenn Greenwald
Friday July 20, 2007 09:27 EST

Bush's magical shield from criminal prosecution

>>>>>snip

(1) What is most significant is, as always, the underlying theory on which this claim is based. From the Post article:
David B. Rifkin, who worked in the Justice Department and White House counsel's office under presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, praised the position and said it is consistent with the idea of a "unitary executive." In practical terms, he said, "U.S. attorneys are emanations of a president's will." And in constitutional terms, he said, "the president has decided, by virtue of invoking executive privilege, that is the correct policy for the entire executive branch."

Just contemplate what that actually means. One of the primary, defining attributes of a civilized society that lives under the rule of law is prosecutorial independence. Without that, political opponents of those in power can be prosecuted for political rather than legal reasons. And worse still, our most powerful political leaders are free to break the law with impunity because they control the prosecutorial process, which -- in this warped view of our republic -- means that presidents have an absolute power to block criminal prosecution of their subordinates who break the law, provided it was done at the President's behest.


The administration's theory is an absolute denial of prosecutorial independence. It means that federal prosecutors are nothing more than obedient servants of the President. They are not merely appointed by the President, but their specific decisions about whether to prosecute executive branch officials for criminal acts are controlled and dictated by the President. They are nothing more, as Rifkin said, than "emanations of the president's will.">>>>snip


http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/07/20/executive_privilege/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. what the hell is up with this Unitary Executive shit
'way back in the 18th century they duked it out over this and decided it would be very, very bad. Shades of George III.

All these assholes promoting a "Unitary Executive" are really despots wanting a dictatorship, thinking they can be part of the "in" crowd and share the spoils, like Saddam Hussein's close friends.

I got news for ya, chumps. The Founding Fathers had it right. You give the power to one person or small group, and the rest of you are fucked.

Promoting a "unitary Executive" is tantamount to advocating htre overthrow of our government, and should be treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. What the hell kind of crap is THAT???
In practical terms, he said, "U.S. attorneys are emanations of a president's will."

In other words, JUSTICE is the "emanation of a president's will." In other words, we don't actually have a democracy, only the appearance or illusion of one. That's always nice to know. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. When someone starts uses "will" describing their right to political power
and not the law. I am reminded of this guy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is reflected in the centralization of decision making. The USAs no longer
have the same independence as before Bushco. Today, unlike for Carol Lam, corporate fraud charging authority is under the decision of the deputy AG. That change took affect a few days after the USA firings. Only Deputy AG McNulty or someone higher can make those centralized decisions today.

I assume that bribes and political contributions are the reason for these changes, but, hey, maybe the people Bush appoints to USA positions are just not capable of doing what past USAs under Clinton did, making independent decisions based on the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Fuehrerprinzip. They are talking about Fuehrerprinzip.
The "Unitary Executive" is, in fact, Fuehrerprinzip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. "emanations" -- what is this, a Victorian-era parlor seance, or something?
Good grief. He actually meant this, seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. That statement OTOH
is an emanation of the President's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is this the same Rivkin
that was dressed like a clown on Hardball yesterday? Did these people not take highschool civics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Magical thinking" is an aberrant mental condition, but we
all already knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. If I were a USA, I'd feel a little insulted,
thinking that Chucklenuts might have thought up my appointment in the wee hours of the morning whilst sleeping -- which would make me a "nocturnal emanation", from his point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. " I serve at the pleasure of the President." Gonzo
Yes, folks we are on the edge of a Fascist Police State.

Will Congress comply to the "New World Order"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCentepedeShoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's the urinary executive
and the enemas of his so-called mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC