JAYJDF
(322 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-20-07 05:51 PM
Original message |
| So, wasn't it Dan Rather who was forced out because of not checking the facts? If so, how the hell |
|
can O'Liely keep telling lies and calling names all in the news name sake and not be forced out?
|
| seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-20-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-20-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Because he is not news... |
|
He is a commentator which, of course, is a big word for Fucking Lier...
|
| skepticscott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-20-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
You talk as if O'Reilly was a journalist or something, and not just a blathering gasbag...
|
| Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-20-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Because his base is not affected by lies, there is no threat to the bottom dollar. n/t |
| Solon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-20-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. The guy is a pathalogical liar, hence its harder to sue him for slander or kick... |
|
him off the air for it. Oddly enough, he has to "know" that he is lying in order to be considered responsible for the bullshit he spouts.
|
| samplegirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-20-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. O'Liely is entertainment |
|
Rather was hard core news.
|
| JAYJDF
(322 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-20-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. Some one needs to tell all those Repuke bozos that they are not watching the news. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
